t-test Technique of Data Analysis

Table 4.1 The Result of Validity of pre-test and Post-test Table 4.2 The Result of Reliability of pre-test Table 4.3 The Result of Reliability of pre-test Based on the description table above, the amount of the subjects were 30 student from each test. So, r table was 0.361 for the significant value of p=0.05. The writer found that from 35 question that were tested, for pre-test, there were 26 valid questions and 9 questions were not valid. The valid number were 1, 2, 3, 6, 8, 11, 12, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 30, 31, 32, 34, 35. Then, there were 25 valid questions and 10 were not valid for the post-test. The valid number were 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 12, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 23, 24, 25, 26,

27, 28, 29, 30, 34, 35. see appendix.

So, for this try out, the Conbarch’s Alpha was 0. 902 for pre-test and 0.891 for post-test. It means that the instrument not only valid but also reliable.The writer conducted normality and homogenity before analyzing the data with t-test. Pre-Test Post-Test Total items tested 35 35 Total subject 30 30 Total significant items 26 25 Reliability Statistics Cronbachs Alpha N of Items ,902 35 Reliability Statistics Cronbachs Alpha N of Items ,891 35 b Normality The normality test is performed using Kolmogriv Smirnnov and Shapiro- Walk. It used to determine if the distribution of the data from sample is normal. The test was done for both classess. Table below show how the data analyzed and interpreted t test the normality data. - Normality of Pre-test Table 4.4 The Result of Normality Test of the Pre-test Tests of Normality Class Kolmogorov-Smirnov a Shapiro-Wilk Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig. Score Experimental Class .192 22 .074 .931 22 .128 Controlled Class .169 22 .105 .934 22 .149 a. Lilliefors Significance Correction The table 4.3 was showed both Kolmogorov. Smirnov and Shapiro test. From Kolmogorov. Smirnov showed that sig. value of the pre-test of the experimental class is 0.074 then sig. value of the pre-test of controlled class is 0.105 . Meanwhile, minimum aplha α value is 0,05 for each sig. value of the pre- test. Therefore, sig value of the pre-test of the experimenta l class is bigger than α 0.074 0.05 and sig. value of the pre-test of the controlled class also bigger than α 0.105 0.05, it means that the samples of both classes were from normal distributed population. In addition, Based on Shapiro. Wilk test, it also showed that sig. α. From the experimental class 0.128 0.05 and from the controlled class 0.149 0.05. In summary, the classes are normal - Normality of Post-test Table 4.5 The Result of Normality Test of The Post-test Tests of Normality Class Kolmogorov-Smirnov a Shapiro-Wilk Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig. Score Experimental Class .150 22 .200 .928 22 .109 Controlled Class .201 22 .102 .944 22 .235 a. Lilliefors Significance Correction The table 4.4 was showed both Kolmogorov. Smirnov and Shapiro test. From Kolmogorov. Smirnovs howed that sig. value of the post-test of the experimental class is 0.200 then sig. value of the post-test of controlled class is 0.102 . Meanwhile, minimum aplha α value is 0,05 for each sig. Value of the post-test. Therefore, sig value of te post-test of the experimental class is bigger than α 0.200 0.05 and sig. value of the post-test of the controlled class also bigger than α 0.102 0.05, it means that the samples of both classes were from normal distributed population. In addition, Based on Shapiro. Wilk test, it also shows that sig. α. From the experimental class 0.109 0.05 and from the controlled class 0.235 0.05. In summary, the classes are normal. - Normality of Gained Score Table 4.6 The Result of Normality Test of Gained Score Tests of Normality Class Kolmogorov-Smirnov a Shapiro-Wilk Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig. Score Expeimental Class .173 22 .084 .932 22 .137 Controlled Class .160 22 .148 .934 22 .146 a. Lilliefors Significance Correction The table 4.4 was showed both Kolmogorov. Smirnov and Shapiro test. From Kolmogorov. Smirnov showed that sig. value of the gained score of the experimental class is 0.084 then sig. value of the gained score of controlled class

Dokumen yang terkait

The Effect of Using Single Pictures on the Eighth Grade Students' Descriptive Text

0 2 5

Comparing The Effectiveness Of Using Jigsaw Technique And Students Team Achievement Divisions Technique In Enhancing Students’ Reading Comprehension (A Quasi Experimental Research At Second Grade Students Of Mts Salafiyah Depok)

2 44 148

The Effectiveness Of Using Story Mapping Technique Towards Students’ Reading Ability Of Narrative Text (A Quasi-Experimental Study At Tenth Grade Students Of Sma N 4 Tangerang Selatan)

4 78 108

The Influence Of Collaborative Strategic Reading (Csr) Technique On Students’ Achievement In Reading Comprehension Of Narrative Text (A Quasi Experimental Study On The Implementation Of Csr At Sma Pgri 109 Kota Tangerang)

1 13 129

The Effectiveness Of Using Clustering Technique Towards Students’ Descriptive Writing (A Quasi-Experimental Study Of The Second Grade Students At Mts. Nurul Hidayah For Academic Year 2013-2014)

0 6 112

The Effectiveness Of Student Teams-Achievement Divisions (Stad) Technique On Students’ Reading Comprehension (A Quasi Experimental Study At Second Grade Students Of Smp Islam Ruhama Ciputat)

1 8 168

An Analysis Of The Readability Level Of Reading Texts In Passport To The World 2 Textbook By Using Cloze Test (A Case Study At The Eighth Grade Students Of Smpn 3 Tangerang Selatan)

0 6 81

Analysis Of The Students’ Ability In Using The Simple Past Tense (A Descriptive Study At The Second Grade Of Smp Negeri 3 South Tangerang )

0 5 69

The Effectiveness Of Using Reading, Encoding, Annotating And Pondering (Reap) Technique Towards Students’ Reading Skill Of Descriptive Text (A Quasi-Experimental Study At The Seventh Grade Of Mts Salafiyah)

5 18 138

The Effectiveness Of Using Collaborative Strategic Reading (Csr) On Students' Reading Comprehension Of Narrative Text" (A Quasi-Experimental Study at the First Grade ofSMA Mathia 'ul Huda Parung PanjangBogor in Academic Year of 201412015),

4 36 111