The Definition of Descriptive Text

d. Use of simple present tense. The descriptive text is text that describe factual object. It means that It have to use simple present tense, except the object was died or extinct. Furthermore, according to the Andersons descriptive text also has linguistic feature. There are verb in the present tense, adjective to describe the features of the subject, then topic sentence to begin paragraphs and organize the various aspects of the description. 19 In summary, reading descriptive text, readers must pay attention to the grammatical features that may be distinguised from other kind of text. They are focused on specific participants using simple present tense. In Addition, Descriptive text is an apporiate text for students. The text may explore many new areas in the world of things, people, and event. Then, they also can activate their prior knowledge about something that they have ever known or heard. Moreover, the students need anticipation with questions or with specific intent. 20 They turns to the text with the purpose of what they want to know. It also increase their curiosity to search the answer of questions because they have asked questiosn as they have gone along. So, the students need to have a way in their reading process to get comprehension.

C. Know, Want and Have Learned K-W-L Technique

1. The Consept of K-W-L Technique

There are many kinds of reading techniques that may be applied in reading text to help students esier to comprehend the text itself. It depends on stud ents‘ purposes and interest. One of the techniques is Know, Want, and have Learned K-W-L chart technique. K-W-L Ogle, 1986 is a process in which the teacher models and guides active engagement informational texts. It is a group process using the knowledge and information students bring to help each other build a better starting place for learning and share the result of their reading. 21 19 Mark Anderson and Kathy Anderson, Text Types in English 3 Sydney: Macmillan, 2003, p.26. 20 John J. DeBoer, Martha Dallamann, The Teaching of Reading, Columbus: Holt, Rinehart,and Winston, Inc: 1964, p.8 21 Camille Blachowicz and Donna Ogle, Reading Comprehension, New York: The Guilford Press: 2008, p. 113. K-W-L stands for ‗what I kow‘, ‗what I want to know‘, and ‗what I have learned‘. The purpose of K-W-L chart technique provides a structure for activiting and building prior knowledge, establishing a purpose for reading and for summarizing what was learned. So, this technique may evaluate their learning experience, as well as serve assessment tool for teacher. K-W-L guides students thought their reading material. it is primary purposes is to develop a framework which students may use as they read.

2. The K-W-L Chart

The K-W-L chart has three columns. First, provides students with the opportunity to brainstorm and list the ideas in K items and details that they already know about the topic. Second, they review the topic again and consider what they still want to know. They list these items in the W section of the chart. Item should be listed as questions. Third, as they read or after they read, students add details that they have kearned while reading. They list these items in the L section of the chart. K Know Pre-reading W Want to Know whilst-reading L Have Learned Post-Reading Students list everything they think or they know about the topic; concept what they do already know. Students tell what they want to know about the topic. Make questions as the purpose of reading After students have finished reading or studying a topic, they list what they have learned about new facts, ideas, or viewpoints that they had not yet considered before. Table 2.2 K-W-L Chart

3. The Prosedure of K-W-L Chart

K-W-L stands for three questions that readers should ask themselves. Two questions are asked before reading; what do I know? and What do I want to learn. Then, the last question is asked after the reading; What had I learned from this text?. All of the question correspond to the mental operations to accessing prior information, determining reading purposes, and recalling information. 22 Based on Blachowicz and Ogle, here are the procedures to apply K-W-L chart in teaching reading: 23 1. The teacher guides students in brainstorming or probe their prior knowledge what they already know about the topic of reading. It helps to have students list and share their ideas 2. Teacher creates a K-W-L chart on the board, overhead projector, or computer and writing down the information about what students think or ideas in K – What do we Know ? column. The teacher is not to correct or evaluate but to encourage and stimulate students to think broadly about what they bring about the study. 3. Teacher asks students to think of questions they have about the topic. generally, it will surface on through brainstorming or discussion process. They may begin by reviewing what they know, and finding where their knowledge is incomplete. Write questions on the chart in the colmn marked W - What do we Want to know? 4. The students now should read the text. They are reminded to look for answers to their questions, and for any new ideas they did not anticipate. 5. The students report the things they have learned both they report answers they found to their questions, and then they report any other interesting or important ideas they discovered. It may be writing on the chart in the column marke L- What have we Learned? Thus it concludes that in the K-W-L technique tea cher‘s role stimulates questions for all to persuade as they learn to learn. Because the teacher is the first one to write on the board, it permits students to see models what the students will 22 Gillet, Temple, Temple, Crawford, Understanding Reading Problem, Boston: Pearson, 2012, p.173. 23 Camille Blachowicz and Donna Ogle, Reading Comprehension, New York: The Guilford Press: 2008, p. 114.

Dokumen yang terkait

The Effect of Using Single Pictures on the Eighth Grade Students' Descriptive Text

0 2 5

Comparing The Effectiveness Of Using Jigsaw Technique And Students Team Achievement Divisions Technique In Enhancing Students’ Reading Comprehension (A Quasi Experimental Research At Second Grade Students Of Mts Salafiyah Depok)

2 44 148

The Effectiveness Of Using Story Mapping Technique Towards Students’ Reading Ability Of Narrative Text (A Quasi-Experimental Study At Tenth Grade Students Of Sma N 4 Tangerang Selatan)

4 78 108

The Influence Of Collaborative Strategic Reading (Csr) Technique On Students’ Achievement In Reading Comprehension Of Narrative Text (A Quasi Experimental Study On The Implementation Of Csr At Sma Pgri 109 Kota Tangerang)

1 13 129

The Effectiveness Of Using Clustering Technique Towards Students’ Descriptive Writing (A Quasi-Experimental Study Of The Second Grade Students At Mts. Nurul Hidayah For Academic Year 2013-2014)

0 6 112

The Effectiveness Of Student Teams-Achievement Divisions (Stad) Technique On Students’ Reading Comprehension (A Quasi Experimental Study At Second Grade Students Of Smp Islam Ruhama Ciputat)

1 8 168

An Analysis Of The Readability Level Of Reading Texts In Passport To The World 2 Textbook By Using Cloze Test (A Case Study At The Eighth Grade Students Of Smpn 3 Tangerang Selatan)

0 6 81

Analysis Of The Students’ Ability In Using The Simple Past Tense (A Descriptive Study At The Second Grade Of Smp Negeri 3 South Tangerang )

0 5 69

The Effectiveness Of Using Reading, Encoding, Annotating And Pondering (Reap) Technique Towards Students’ Reading Skill Of Descriptive Text (A Quasi-Experimental Study At The Seventh Grade Of Mts Salafiyah)

5 18 138

The Effectiveness Of Using Collaborative Strategic Reading (Csr) On Students' Reading Comprehension Of Narrative Text" (A Quasi-Experimental Study at the First Grade ofSMA Mathia 'ul Huda Parung PanjangBogor in Academic Year of 201412015),

4 36 111