b.  Teacher and Learner Roles   Teacher Roles
The teacher in Total Physical Response classroom is the teacher that to take a role like a director, direct learner with giving them command
and learner  must  respond. The  teacher  needs to make  learning  process  is active and fun. Because of that, the teacher should have well-prepared and
well-organized  so  that  the  lesson  will  flow  like  what  you  want  and predictable.
  Learner Roles
The  main  role  of  the  learner  is  as  a  listener  and  performer.
53
Learner listens  commands  from  the  teacher  listener and  respond it  with physically  performer.  Learners  are  like  an  actor  in  the  classroom  who
performs all the command from teacher. The teacher has to make learners monitor and evaluate their own progress. So they have ability to know the
progress of their achievement.
c.  Types of Learning and activities
Type of learning in Total Physical Response is with the imperative drill. Where  the  teacher  gives  commands,  request,  suggestion  and  so  on,  to  the
students  until they understand the meaning of the sentence and each  verb in the sentence. After the students understand the teacher start to explain about
the material. In  conclusion,  Total  Physical  Response  has  an  objective  there  is  to
teach  oral  proficiency  of  the  students  using  the  sentence-based  syllabus.  In  the classroom, the teacher and learners have their own roles. The roles are connected
each other. It can symbolize like a director and an actor, with giving commands, request, suggestion and so on to the actor until students understand the meaning of
the sentence, the sentence is delivered by command, request, and so on.
53
Jack  C. Richards, and  Theodore S. Rodgers,  Approaches  and Methods in  Language Teaching: A Description and Analysis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986, p. 93.
5.  The Advantage and Disadvantage of Total Physical Response
Just like any method that use in teaching in the classroom, Total Physical Response  also  has  advantage  and  disadvantage.  For  the  advantage,  it  could  help
teacher to deliver the material with a  fun  way, because Total Physical  Response involve  physical  activities  in  teaching  learning  activity.  Students  will  enjoy
getting up out their chairs and moving around. This is in line with the principles of TPR that is “Language learning is more effective  when it is fun”.
54
It means that learning  a  foreign  language  with  Total  Physical  Response  helps  the  student
interest  to  the  lesson  and  it  helps  student  to  understand  the  meaning  of  the sentence.  Meanwhile,  Setiyadi  said  that  “to  avoid  the  students  from  stress,
language class consists of commands and language learners perform physically”.
55
Based  on  that  definition,  we  could  see  that with  physical  activities  students  will ready  to  receive  the  lesson  that  teaches  by  the  teacher  because  they  did  not  feel
stress. However,  Total  Physical  Response  also  has  disadvantage.  The
disadvantage of Total Physical response is the limitation of students’ vocabulary. In  Total  Physical  Response,  teacher  stress  to  students  that  they  may  guess  the
meaning  of  the  sentence  by  performing  the  actions  in  accordance  with  the command.  If  students  have  lack  of  vocabulary,  they  will  not  understand  the
command  and  make  them  confuse.  Confusion  in  performing  the  actions  may cause boredom and frustration.
56
If students feel bored, they will not focus when studying  the  lesson  and  ignore  the  teacher.  Because  of  that,  teacher  must  be
careful in choosing words to teach. In conclusion, the advantage of Total Physical Response is providing the
teaching  learning  activities  with  a  fun  way  or  students  perform  the  commands from the teacher with physical movement. And the disadvantage of Total Physical
Response is students will not understand the command if the students have lack of vocabulary.
54
Diane  Larsen-Freeman,  Techniques  and  Principles  in  Language  Teaching,  Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000, p. 112.
55
Bambang  Setiyadi,  Teaching  English  as  A  Foreign  Language,  Yogyakarta:  Graha Ilmu, 2006, p. 132.
56
Bambang Setiyadi, Teaching English as A Foreign Language, … p. 128.