Applying summarizing activities The Implementation of Cycle II
the text entitled Holiday in Kupang, they directly mentioned the SWBST and its summary. It made me so surprise. Moving to the first task which was about some
multiple choice questions, the researcher asked the students to finish it individually, because the task was too easy to be worked in pairs or group.
1 Determining Somebody-Wanted-But-So-Then
Then, the next task was the task asking the students to work individually. The task was about summarizing. In process, without guidance the students
determined the SWBST first. They still asked me in determining the part of SWBST, but overall they finished the other parts by themselves. In second cycle,
the researcher also promised the students to give a reward for the best reader and the best group in finishing the task correctly. It made the students being
motivated. From the students‟ opinion, the writer, some friends, and a foreigner lady
and her daughter were the Somebody. The students felt easy in determining the Somebody. Next was Wanted. Wanted represents the plot. The story was told
about the writer‟s holiday to the Borobudur Temple with her friends. The third part is problem. The part But states conflict or challenge the person or people
faced. Their meeting with the foreigner lady and her daughter was a problem because from their meeting, the writer and her friend knew about cross-cultural
understanding. Every story or text should not have the solution, but in this text, the students could find how to solve the problem above. Finally, they say sorry to
the foreigner of being not respectful. The students have finished the first text well. Then they moved to the next task in the form of comprehension questions.
In the second cycle first meeting, the researcher moved the theme about the holiday. In this session, she asked them to do some tasks related to the
comprehension questions, such as multiple choice related to the text and truefalse questions. In modeling the text, she remembered to the students about the
SWBST, and then asked them to mention the SWBST in the text entitled My Holiday in Flores. Firstly, while writing the part of the SWBST on the board, the
researcher pointed a student to read the text. After they read the text, directly she asked them to mention the SWBST part. Some students mentioned it well, but few
students were quiet.
2 Making a summary
After determining the detailed information, the students made a summary based on it. In the Cycle 1, they were very confused and did not want to do the
tasks, but in the Cycle 2, they did the tasks confidently. Sometimes, if they found difficulties, they asked to me. In summarizing the recount text, the students were
still confused because they were familiar with narrative text. Their second task was done in pairs. The researcher guessed that worked in
pairs was more help the students in summarizing the text than their worked individually. The researcher remembered the students about the use of the
connective words to combine the determined information. Firstly the students looked rather confused because in the meeting before they summarized narrative
text. They asked to me many times whether their summary was right or false. After that, the researcher asked them to finish the third task individually. In the
third task, their comprehension was tested. After checking their summary, most of the students were right with their answer.
In the second meeting, the task asked the students to make a summary based on the text orally. One of the students read the paragraphs; the other students were
busy with their activity. Surprisingly, after she finished her last paragraph the students automatically made a summary in their handout and spontaneously they
mentioned the summary of the text using their own words as exemplified in the field note below. It me
ant that students‟ reading comprehension was increasing better than before.