56
23. Teaching Skill: “End the class using proper expressions.”
a. Students who were motivated to be teacher
59.72 of the participants who were motivated to be teacher were in the high teacher personal efficacy for the skill. Meanwhile, 40.28 of the participants
were in the average level of teacher personal efficacy for the skill. And 0 or none of the participants was in the low teacher personal efficacy for the skill.
b. Students who were not motivated to be teacher
53.85 of the participants who were not motivated to be teacher were in the average level of teacher personal efficacy for the skill. Meanwhile, 38.46 of the
participants were in the high teacher personal efficacy for the skill. And 7.69 of the participants were in the low teacher personal efficacy for the skill.
24. Teaching Skill: “Motivate students to learn at home or outside the class”
a. Students who were motivated to be teacher
63.89 of the participants who were motivated to be teacher were in the average level of teacher personal efficacy for the skill. Meanwhile, 36.11 of the
participants were in the high teacher personal efficacy for the skill. And 0 or none of the participants was in the low teacher personal efficacy for the skill.
b. Students who were not motivated to be teacher
73.08 of the participants who were not motivated to be teacher were in the average level of teacher personal efficacy for the skill. Meanwhile, 19.23 of the
participants were in the high teacher personal efficacy for the skill. And 7.69 of the participants were in the low teacher personal efficacy for the skill.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
25. Teaching Skill:
a. Students who w
62.50 of the average level of teache
participants were in t none of the participant
b. Students who w
69.23 of the p average level of teache
participants were in the the participants were
ii. Complete Teac
1. Teacher Person
a. Students who w
Figure 4 The Tea
5 10
15 20
25 30
35 40
45
0-10 11
N u
m b
er o
f P
a rt
ic ip
a n
ts
ill: “Manage time in teaching well” o were motivated to be teacher
he participants who were motivated to be teac cher personal efficacy for the skill. Meanwhile
n the high teacher personal efficacy for the ski pants was in the low teacher personal efficacy for
o were not motivated to be teacher
he participants who were not motivated to be tea cher personal efficacy for the skill. Meanwhile
the high teacher personal efficacy for the skil re in the low teacher personal efficacy for the ski
aching Skills sonal Efficacy Point
o were motivated to be teacher
eacher Personal Efficacy Points of the Student Motivated to be Teachers
1-20 21-30 31-40 41-50 51-60 61-70 71-80 81-90 91-1
0 0 1 19
44
8
Efficacy Points
57
acher were in the hile, 37.50 of the
skill. And 0 or for the skill.
teacher were in the hile, 23.08 of the
skill. And 7.69 of skill.
nts who were
100
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
Figure 4 shows participants who were
four participants 61.11 19 nineteen participa
eight participants 11.1 one participant 1.39
b. Students who w
Figure 5 The Teache
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
0-10 11-20
N u
m b
er o
f P
a rt
ic ip
a n
ts
s the distribution of the Teacher personal eff ere motivated to be teacher had. It can be seen
61.11 had the points in the range of 71 up to cipants 26.39 had the points in the range of
11.11 had the points in the range of 81 up t 1.39 had the points in the range of 51 up to 60.
o were not motivated to be teachers
acher Personal Efficacy Points of the Students w Motivated to be Teacher
21-30 31-40
41-50 51-60
61-70 71-80
1 5
9 10
Efficacy Points
58
efficacy Points the seen that 44 forty-
to 80. Meanwhile, of 61 up to 70. 8
up to 90, whereas 1 60.
nts who were not
81-90 91-100
1
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
Figure 5 shows participants who were
participants 38.46 nine participants 34.6
participants 19.23 participant 3.85 ha
participant 3.85 ha
2. Teacher Person
a. Students who w
Figure 6 The Tea
It is obviously motivated to be teac
Meanwhile, 9.72 of level. And none of the
level. shows the distribution of the teacher personal eff
ere not motivated to be teacher had. It can be se 38.46 had the points in the range of 71 up to 80.
34.62 had the points in the range of 61 up 19.23 had the points in the range of 51 up to 60,
had the points in the range of 31 up to 40. And had the points in the range of 81 up to 90.
sonal Efficacy Level o were motivated to be teachers
Teacher Personal Efficacy Level of the Students motivated to be Teacher
y seen from Figure 6 that most of the partici eacher were in the average teacher personal
of the participants were in the high teacher pe the participants 0 was in the low teacher p
90.28 9.72
Low Average
High
59
efficacy points the seen that 10 ten
80. Meanwhile, 9 up to 70. 5 five
60, whereas 1 one nd another 1 one
nts who were
icipants who were sonal efficacy level.
r personal efficacy r personal efficacy
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
b. Students who w
Kategori