b. Students who w
Figure 7 The Teac As seen in Figu
teacher 92.31 wer 3.85 of the participa
3.85 of the participa
iii. The Students’ G
1. The Students’ w
Figure 8 The Gene As seen in
motivated to be teache was followed by 38.89
o were not motivated to be teachers
acher Personal Efficacy Level of the Students w Motivated to be Teacher
igure7, most of the participants who were not ere in the average teacher personal efficacy le
cipants were in the high teacher personal effi ipants were in the low teacher personal efficacy
s’ General Assessment on Their Teaching Ab s’ who were motivated to be Teacher
neral Assessment on the Students General Tea in Figure 8, more than half of the participa
acher 59.72 claimed that they has good tea 38.89 of the participants who stated that their
3.85 92.31
3.85
Low Average
High
38.89 59.72
1.39
V We
F G
V
60
s who were not not motivated to be
level. Meanwhile, fficacy level. And
cy level.
Ability
eaching Ability cipants who were
teaching ability. It heir teaching ability
age
Very Weak Weak
Fair Good
Very Good
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
was fair. Meanwhile, had was very good.
ability was weak or ve
2. The Students’ w
Figure 9 The Gene From Figure 9,
were not motivated to fair. It can also be se
ability is good. Mea ability they had was v
teaching ability was ve
iv. The Students’ C
1. The Students’ w
Figure 10 Th
51.72
78.5
le, 1.39 of the participants claimed the teachi good. And none or 0 of the participants claime
very weak.
s’ who were not motivated to be Teacher
neral Assessment on the Students General Tea , it can be stated that more than a half of the pa
to be teacher 51.72 claimed that their teac seen that 31.03 of the participants stated tha
Meanwhile, 17.24 of the participants claime s very weak. And none or 0 of the participant
s very weak or very good.
s’ Certainty on their Ability to Teach Well s’ who were motivated to be Teacher
The Students Certainty on their Ability to Teac
17.24 31.03
V We
F G
V
1.43 7.14
.57 12.86
Very Un Uncertai
Do not K Certain
Very Ce
61
aching ability they ed their teaching
eaching Ability he participants who
aching ability was that their teaching
imed the teaching pants claimed their
each well
Very Weak Weak
Fair Good
Very Good
Uncertain tain
ot Know ain
Certain
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
As seen in Fig motivated to be teac
teach well. It was fol were very certain. Me
1.43 of the participa stated that they were ve
2. The Students’ w
Figure 11 Th Figure 11 show
be teacher were certa the participants who
26.92 of the partici 7.69 of the participa
stated that they were ve
26.9
Figure10, it shows that most of the participa acher 78.57 stated that they were certain
followed by 12.86 of the participants who Meanwhile, 7.14 of the participants were ne
icipants were uncertain. And none or 0 of e very uncertain to their teaching ability.
who were not motivated to be Teacher
The Students Certainty on their Ability to Teac shows that 34.62 of the participants who were not
rtain that they could teach well. It was followe ho were uncertain that they could teach w
icipants stated that they were neutral or did not cipants were very certain. And none or 0 of
e very uncertain to their teaching ability.
30.77 .92
34.62
7.69
62
cipants who were in that they could
ho stated that they e neutral, whereas
of the participants
each well e not motivated to
owed by 30.77 of well. Meanwhile,
not know, whereas of the participants
Very Uncertain Uncertain
Do not Know Certain
Very Certain
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
63
b. Discussion on the Teacher Personal Efficacy Level of the Microteaching
Kategori