64
social persuasion— occurs in Microteaching. Therefore, Microteaching provides sources of self-efficacy of the students. What occurs in Microteaching is
obviously the teaching practice, thus the self-efficacy generated in Microteaching is self-efficacy on teaching. The self-efficacy is defined as teacher personal
efficacy. It means that the personal belief of the teacher on his teaching skills that can affect learners’ achievement Alderman, 2001. On the other words,
Microteaching can help the students to generate their ‘teacher personal efficacy’. Below are the results of the research on the students’ level of efficacy.
1. The Students’ teacher personal efficacy Level is Mostly in Average
Level
There were 90.82 of the total participants who had the average efficacy level. The average efficacy level’s point is ranging from 50-79. There were 8.16
of the total participants who had high efficacy level. The level is ranging from 80- 100. And there was only 1 one participant 1.02 who had low efficacy level.
2. The Students Possess Better Efficacy on Certain Teaching Skills
On certain skills, the students had better efficacy. Those skills were: a.
Vary learning media There were 46.94 of the total participants who had the high efficacy level 80-
100 for the skill. And the others had the average efficacy level 50-79. b.
Summarize the learning material More than a half of the total participants 54.08 who had the high efficacy level
80-100 for the skill. And the others had the average efficacy level 50-79.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
65
c. End the lesson
Similar to the previous skill, the participants who had the high efficacy level 80- 100 for the closure skill were more than a half of the total participants 54.08.
And the others had the average efficacy level 50-79. d.
Help learners to focus their attention to learning The skill help learners to focus their attention to learning had the highest
percentage of the participants who had the high efficacy level 80-100. There were more than a half of the total participants 55.10. And the others had the
average efficacy level 50-79.
3.
The Students Had Less Efficacy on Certain Skills
Some of the students had less efficacy level. The indicator was by seeking the skill which has the fewest participants who had high efficacy level. Those skills
are namely: a.
Give Brief, Clear and Proper Explanation to Students There was only 19.39 of the total participant who had high efficacy level.
Besides, the skill has 2.04 of the total participants who had low efficacy level. b.
Manage Disturbance The skill Manage Disturbance seems to have the lowest efficacy. There was only
17.35 of the total participant who had high efficacy level. Moreover, 3.06 of the total participants had low efficacy level.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
4. Most of the Stu
