Reflection The Report of Cycle 2
88 continuing to give more vocabulary to the students due to their lack of vocabulary.
Based on the discussion with the collaborators, the researcher would still use some of the techniques used in the previous cycle and add a new technique which
was using music video. The uses of the techniques were considered helpful in developing students’ vocabulary knowledge. In cycle 2, the students got and
understood a lot of unfamiliar vocabulary through these techniques. The students also were helped to recall their memory about the vocabulary through these
techniques. The music video technique, for example, helped the students to relate their memory with the image showed in the video. The following field notes and
interview transcript justify the argument. P
: Tadi kan pertama-tama kita kan disuruh memahami gambar
kan? Menurut adek, ada manfaatnya nggak? At first, we tried to comprehend the pictures, didn’t we? Is there any
advantage to you ?
M1, M3 : Ada. Yes, there is.
M2 : Banyak. A lot.
P : Manfaatnya apa? What are they?
M2, M3 : Bisa menambah wawasan. Broadening our knowledge.
P : Tentang? About what?
M2 : Banyak cara memahami sebuah paragraf lewat gambar. Many
ways to understand a paragraph through pictures. P
: Terus menambah kosakata nggak? Did they develop your vocabulary
? M1, M2
: Iyaa. Yes.
Appendix Bpage 155-156IT 25 line 15 – 24 P seraya mengulang pelajaran pada pertemuan sebelumnya, P membantu murid-
murid mengingat kosa kata terkait memancing. Murid-murid menjawab dengan penuh percaya diri karena mereka masih mengingat kosakata tersebut. “Baiklah,
kalau kail apa bahasa inggrisnya?” tanya P. “Hook” jawab semua murid dengan lantang. “Selain hook, peralatan memancing bahasa inggrisnya apa?”
kata P lagi. “Fishing equipments,” jawab Adi. “Apa lagi yang lain?” “Boat,” ujar Okta. “Ya benar” P dan murid-murid pun melihat video music tentang
memancing dan melakukan tanya jawab mengenai video tersebut, mulai dari apa
89 yang digunakan oleh orang yang sedang memancing di dalam video tersebut, apa
yang dia tangkap, mengapa dia melepaskannya. While reviewing the last meeting, the teacher helped the students recalling
their memory of the vocabulary of going fishing. The students confidently answered because they still remember it. “Ok, what ‘kail’ in English?” asked
the teacher. “Hook” all of the students answered it loudly. “What’s “peralatan memancing” in English?” asked the teacher again. “Fishing
equipment,” said Adi. The teacher said again, “What else?” “Boat,” Okta answered. “Yes, right,” said the teacher. After that they watched the music
video about fishing and had discussion from what the man is doing in the video, what he catches, why he lets it go.
Appendix Apage 122FN 10 The researcher, the English teacher as the collaborator and the other
collaborator decided that the action has successfully developed the students’ vocabulary knowledge. The techniques have helped the students to learn a lot of
unfamiliar vocabulary. The interview transcript below gives the justification. P
: Ini saya kan sudah selesai memberikan action pada mereka. Bagaimana menurut Bapak mengenai pencapaian mereka? I have
finished in giving the actions to them. In your opinion, how is the achievement?
K1 : Iya, Mbak Agatha. Saya sangat terbantu dengan pemberian tindakan selama beberapa meeting ini. Menurut saya, anak-anak sudah
menunjukkan peningkatan, khususnya di grammar, vocab. Mereka juga lebih aktif menjawab. Yes, indeed Mbak Agatha. I am very helped for
these meetings. In my opinion, there have been some improvement in their grammar and vocabulary
. They also have been more actively involved when you asked them.
Appendix Bpage 161IT 32 line 19 – 24
b Using the Socratic questioning technique to improve students’
grammar knowledge
The students’ grammar knowledge was previously developed in cycle 1. However, the researcher and the collaborator decided to keep give them some
grammar knowledge but only just to recall the students’ memory and make them more understand with the grammar. In cycle 2, one of the techniques was still
90 used. It was the Socratic-questioning technique. Based on the researcher and the
collaborators’ discussion from the observation during the class, almost all of the students have showed their improvement in grammar knowledge. The previous
interview transcripts were the evidence of the discussion.
c Using Ideas-Sketching and Jigsaw techniques to improve students’
reading comprehension skills
Most of the reading comprehension skills which the students were lack in have considered successful in the previous cycle. Based on the English teacher’s
suggestion, the researcher would more focus on developing students in finding the main ideas of paragraph. Therefore the researcher decided to use Ideas-Sketching
activity Visual-Spatial intelligence techniques and Jigsaw
activity Interpersonal, Bodily-Kinesthetic, and Linguistics intelligence techniques to
help them figure out and develop their skill in finding the main ideas. Based on the observation and the interviews, most of the students enjoyed these activities.
The students are also helped in developing their skill in finding the main ideas. During the discussion with the researcher, both of the collaborators also state that
they see improvement in the students’ skills of finding the main ideas. However, the collaborator states that the researcher still need to consider the space during
the Jigsaw Activity because of the narrow space in the classroom. The collaborators’ comments toward the students’ improvement are showed in the
interview transcripts below. P
: Bagaimana dengan kemampuan reading comprehension mereka Pak? How about their reading comprehension, Sir?
K1 : Menurut saya, sudah jauh lebih baik. Mereka bisa lebih memahami
91 teks, menentukan pernyataan yang benar dan salah, menentukan
pokok pikiran. Begitu. I think it’s much getting better. They can more understand the text, distinguishing the right or wrong
statement, determining the main ideas.
P : Kalau dari mbak Novia, ada saran atau komentar? Is there any
suggestion or comment from Miss Novia? K2
: Aku sih kurang lebih sama kaya Pak Kantet. Kamunya juga udah bagus, nggak kaya meeting 1, udah pede lah. Anak-anaknya juga suka
sama pelajaran tadi. I have the same opinion with Mr. Kantet. You are getting better in teaching, not like in the first meeting. You became
more confident. The students also likes the lesson.
P : Menurutmu, mereka jadi lebih bisa menentukan pokok pikiran? Do
you think they have been able to determine the main ideas? K2
: Tadi aku sambil lihat-lihat diskusi murid, menurutku, mereka udah
mulai bisa menentukan pokok pikiran. Well, when I observe their discussion, I think they are getting better in determining the main
ideas .
Appendix Bpage 161-162IT 32 line 25 – 35
d Using the Multiple Intelligences–based techniques to improve the
classroom activities
As stated in the previous reflection, the researcher and the collaborator have agreed that the classroom activities have improved through the use of the
Multiple-Intelligences–based techniques. However, the English teacher suggested that the researcher still had to work on the class management so that the students
were not longer noisy during the teaching and learning process. Therefore, the researcher decided to be more firm in the class. The collaborators, during the
discussion, stated that they saw differences between cycle 1 and 2 though there were some students who did not obey the rule. Both of the activities were varied,
but the class seemed more controllable in cycle 2.
2 promoting group discussion to improve the classroom interaction
between the teacher and the students and among the students and the students’ participation.
92 In cycle 1, the group discussion has successfully improved the classroom
interaction and the students’ participation. However, the students became noisy. Some group were filled the students with their closed friends and started to disturb
their friends and did not actively involved in the discussion. Thus, the researcher and the collaborators decided to keep such students apart. The students who have
possibility to make noises would be placed in different group. The result of the action was almost successful because still few students disturbed their friends.
However, the collaborators and the researcher considered this action was quite successful in developing classroom interaction and the students’ participation.
Based on the reflections of cycle 2, the researcher and the collaborators have agreed that all actions were successful in improving the teaching and
learning process of reading and the objective of the research was accomplished. Therefore, they decided to end the research in this cycle.