108
CHAPTER V CONCLUSIONS, IMPLICATIONS, AND SUGGESTIONS
This chapter discusses three main parts. The first discusses the conclusion of  this  research.  The  second  part  discusses  the  implications.  The  third  part
provides  suggestions  for  readers  and  future  researchers,  English  teachers,  and students.
A. CONCLUSIONS
This  research  was  conducted  to  answer  two  research  questions.  Those were:  1  What  is  the  conceptual  model  of  a  competence-based  English  syllabus
for  socio-cultural  divisions  of  vocational  high  school  like?  2  What  is  the development  product  of  a  competence-based  English  syllabus  for  socio-cultural
divisions of vocational high school like? Therefore, this research employed R  D steps combined with ADDIE’s steps to answer the research questions.
Conceptually, the competence-based English syllabus model employed the concept of Competence-based Learning. It was designed to achieve at least three
learning goals, such as: the achievement of knowledge, the achievement of skills, and the achievement of attitude. The syllabus was practical rather than theoretical.
Therefore, the larning goals focused on what they could do with the language they have learnt. The model was designed to be closely related to the students’ working
needs.  It  was  in  the form  of a three-year syllabus  and a sample unit. The  grades were differentiated based on three level of difficulties, namely: easy for grade X,
intermediate for grade XI, and difficult for grade XII. Grade X was categorized as PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
easy  since  it  involved  less  people  in  communication,  simple  grammatical knowledge,  and  aimed  to  fulfill    the  students’  self-needs.  Meanwhile  Grade  XI
was  categorized  as  intermediate  since  it  involved  more  people,  more  complex grammatical  knowledge,  and  prepare  students  to  have  a  speech  in  front  of
audiences.  Meanwhile  grade  XII  was  categorized  as  difficult  since  it  involved  a lot  of  people  audiences,  improved  leadership  skills,  and  involved  complex
grammatical knowledge. The development product of the Three-year Syllabus provided information
on  the  whole  program  from  grade  X  until  grade  XII.  The  syllabus  informed  the learning  goals,  learning  process,  assessment,  time  allocation,  and  also  learning
resources.  The  materials  were  mainly  in  the  form  of  samples.  It  encouraged students to be actively involved in the learning process. They should analyze the
samples, find the language knowledge, and then produce the language. Meanwhile, the sample unit provided information on the kinds of materials
and  how  to  conduct  the  teaching  and  learning  activity.  It  consisted  of  eight activities.  The  Set  Your  Goals  part  informed  students  the  goals  of  what  they  are
learning. The Share Your Thoughts was an activity intended to grab the students’
attention on the topic. The Guess the Words part was a description of vocabulary they might find in the previous discussion. The Read Out Loud part consisted of
some  samples  of  dialogues  related  to  the  topic.  Students  needed  to  analyze  the samples  based  on  the  instructions.  The  Language  Notes  was  used  to  clarify  the
aspect  of  language  they  found  in  the  samples.  The Let’s  Practice  was  the  pre
activity before the performing activity. It consisted of some exercises. The next is PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
Let’s Perform. After getting feedbacks from the teachers, students should perform the dialogue. It was intended to let students know the kinds of situation in the real
context. The last part was Review which was to see the achievements of learning indicators.
This  research  conducted  preliminary  field  testing  to  evaluate  the development  product  of  Comptence-based  English  Syllabus  Model.  The  result
gained score   4.15  from  the  scale  5.00.  It  indicated  that  the  model  was  very good.  After  that  the  implementation  was  done  in  two  classes.  The  questionaires
were distributed for students  after the class  was  over. The result  gained score of 4.27 from the scale 5.00. It also indicated that the model was very good.
Overall,  the  participants  gave  positive  responses  to  the  development product. The relevant topics of their future working fields helped them relate the
language into reality. They could imagine how they would practice the knowledge when they worked. Moreover, they could have more interactions with classmates
especially  for  discussing  the  materials.  Students  could  analyze  and  produce  the language by themselves. The model needed to  be conducted in  every meeting to
make them being independent in learning.
B. IMPLICATIONS