4.13 The Appearance of  Review part see App9.2
2. Preliminary Field Testing
After  designing,  the  third  step  of  ADDIE  which  referred  to  development was  conducted.  It  aimed  to  describe  things  which  needed  improvements.  The
information  was  important  to  develop  the  product  before  implementing. Questionnaires  were  distributed  for  three  English  teachers  and  a  lecturer  of
English  Language  Study  Program.  The  participants  of  expert  validation  is presented as follows.
Table 4.3 Validating Experts
Participants Gender
Educational Background
Teaching Experience
in year F
M S1
S2 S3
1-5 6-10
10 English Lecturer
1 1
1 English Teachers
3 2
1 2
1 The  data  gathered  from  three  participants.  They  were  chosen  based  on
their  expertise.  They  were  considered  fully  understand  about  teaching  English. The  evaluators  were  three  English  teachers  of  vocational  high  school  of  SMK
Putra  Tama  Bantul  and  one  lecturer  of  English  Language  Education  program  in Sanata  Dharma  University,  Yogyakarta.  Their  teaching  experiences  were  varied
from  5  until  10  years.  All  participants  should  fill  in  the  questionnaire  which consisted of twenty items of closed questions and three items of open questions.
Table 4.4 Interpretation of the degree of agreement for experts’ validation Range
Interpretation
≥4 No Revision.
3.4 - 3.9 Conduct more exploration on the existing part of the designed
model based on the statement. 2.8
– 3.3 Add more part or modify part of the designed model based on
the lack of the statement. 0.0
– 2.7 Replace the rejected part of the designed model.
The  data  was  interpreted  to  identify  the  results  of  the  closed-ended questionnaire.  The  interpretation  of  the  degree  of  agreement  for  experts’
validation  is  presented  in  table  above.  Moreover,  the  experts’  validation  results can be summarized as follows.
Table 4.5 Experts’ Validation Result No
Statements Central Tendency
N  Mean  Criteria
1 The competence-based English Syllabus Model is
appropriate for students under Socio-cultural divisions in Vocational High School.
4  4.25 Very
High
2 The Competence-based English Syllabus Model
meets students’ needs. 4  4.25
Very High
3 The Competence-based English Syllabus Model
helps students to enhance their English skills. 4  4.00
Very High
4 The Competence-based English Syllabus Model
invites students to participate in the learning process.
4  4.50 Very
High
5 The Competence-based English Syllabus Model
provides learning materials which are relevant to the students’ future carriers.
4  4.50 Very
High
6 The Competence-based English Syllabus Model
provides opportunity to develop the knowledge, skills, and attitudes.
4  4.25 Very
High
7 Learning objectives are well-formulated in the
syllabus. 4  4.00
Very High
8 Learning objectives mentioned in the syllabus are
practical and appropriate for the students under socio-cultural divisions.
4  4.25 Very
High
9 The learning topics in the syllabus help learners to
achieve the learning objectives. 4  4.00
Very High
10 The learning topics in the syllabus are related to the
prospective working fields of students under socio- cultural divisions.
4  4.50 Very
High
11 The learning process will motivate studentss to
learn. 4  4.00
Very High
12 The learning process will help students to achieve
the competences. 4  4.00
Very High
13 The assessment can measure the students
achievements on the competences. 4  4.00
Very High
14 The assessment is applicable.
4  4.00 Very
High 15
The time allocation for each learning topic in the syllabus is appropriate.
4  4.25 Very
High 16
The total amount of time is applicable to be done within a year.
4  4.25 Very
High 17
The unit is well-designed. 4  4.25
Very High
18 The unit uses appropriate language.
4  4.00 Very
High 19
The unit uses clear instructions. 4  4. 00
Very High
20 The materials is relevant to the core competence
and basic competences. 4  4.00
Very High
21 Pictures and colors are well-arranged.
4  4.25 Very
High 22
The Set Your Goals part helps students to know the purpose of what they are learning.
4  4.50 Very
High 23
The Set Your Goals part helps students to know the activities they are going to do.
4  4.25 Very
High 24
The Share Your Thoughts part is interesting as an opening activity.
4  4.00 Very
High 25
The Share Your Thoughts part enhances the students’ curiousity about the topic.
4  4.00 Very
High 26
The Guess the Words part helps students to find the meaning of some difficult words they find in the
previous discussion. 4  4.00
Very High
27 The Guess the Words
part improves the students’ vocabulary knowledge.
4  4.25 Very
High 28
The Read Out Loud part provides appropriate samples for students to analyze.
4  4.25 Very
High 29
The Read Out Loud part allows students to relate the language to the real context.
4  4.25 Very
High 30
The Language Notes clarifies the aspect of language used in the samples.
4  4.00 Very
High 31
The Language Notes enhances the students’
knowledge about the language. 4  4.25
Very High
32 The
Let’s Practice part allows students to improve their language skills.
4  4.00 Very
High 33
The Let’s Practice part is appropriate for preparing
students to the performing activity. 4  4.00
Very High
34 The
Let’s Perform part involves students to perform skills they have learnt.
4  4.00 Very
High 35
The Let’s Perform part lets students practice using
the language as it is in the real context. 4  4.25
Very High
The  table  shows  the  opinion  on  the  syllabus  model  from  an  English lecturer  and  three  English  teachers.  They  choose  five  points  namely  strongly
disagree 1, disagree 2, doubt 3, agree 4, and strongly disagree 5. The table 4.15 shows the mean for each item started from point 4.00 until 4.50. Therefore, it
was found that the average point of central tendency was 4.15 from the scale 5.00. The  average  point  of  4.15  was  found  by  counting  all  means  from  each  item  and
then  divided  by  total  items.  The  average  point  of  central  tendency  belonged  to range  ≥4  which  meant  that  the  designed  model  was  no  revision.  The  learning
model  was  indicated  as  acceptable.  Therefore  the  syllabus  model  would  be implemented in the classroom.
Meanwhile  the  data  from  the  open  questions  shows  t he  participants’
opinion and suggestions. The results would be discussed into three main focuses. PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
First,  most  participants  mentioned  that  the  syllabus  model  was  good  enough.  It was  because  of  some  reasons,  such  as:  the  learning  topics  were  already  good  as
they were what needed by students, the use of technology devices in the learning activities  is  a  good  point,  the  syllabus  was  well-arranged,  the  syllabus  was
appropriate  for  students’  competencies  since  it  involves  knowledge,  skills,  and attitudes in the learning activities, the topics were appropriate for SMK students,
the unit provided activities that invite students to produce language like speaking and  writing,  and  it  encouraged  students  to  communicate.  Second,  some  points
were  considered  weak  in  the  model.  Those  weaknesses  were:  there  are  some repetitions  in  the  exercises,  some  of  the  words  are  mistyped,  the  head  of  the
column  does  not  break  in  every  continual  page,  and  the  numbering  is  not  well- arranged. Third, participants also gave some suggestions for the betterment of the
model.  They  suggested  to  make  different  exercises  for  the  students  to  have broader exposure, give a thought on the word ‘knowledge’ so that it will not miss
the  concept  of  competence-based,  recheck  about  the  time  allocation,  provide pictures  or  real  photos,  divide  activities  into  some  parts,  and  check  the  minimal
requirements, such as: typing, consistency, and numbering. Overall, the  results of  experts’ validation showed the Competence-based
English  Syllabus  model  was  considered  as  very  good  and  was  acceptable  to  be implemented. The good things from the model were the model provided materials
which  were  relevant  to  the  students’  future  carrier,  it  invited  the  students  to participate  in  the  production  of  the  language,  it  used  technology  devices,  and  it
involved knowledge, skills, and attitudes. However the model could be improved PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
by  adding  some  more  various  exercises,  designing  more  interesting  layout,  and providing some more authentic pictures.
Based  on  the  suggestions  and  feedbacks from  experts’  validation,  the
model  could  be  improved.  The  unit  was  printed  in  colors.  The  syllabus  was covered  by  a  simple  cover.  The  presentation  of  the  development  product  is
presented as follows.
Figure 4.7 Cover of the Three-year Syllabus
Figure 4.8 Cover of the Sample Unit
Finally,  the  development  product  of  the  Competence-based  English Syllabus was in the form of a three-year syllabus and a sample unit. The product
was specially designed for Socio-cultural divisions as it was written on the cover. The  three-year  syllabus  was  intented  to  provide  students  the  whole  program  of
competence-based English learning from grade X until grade XII. Meanwhile, the Sample  Unit  provided  the  example  of  the  materials  and  how  to  conduct  the
teaching  and  learning  activities.  The  unit  provided  eight  activities.  Mainly  the activities  were  classified  into  setting  learning  goals,  warming  up  activity,  main
activity,  and  producing  activity.  Those  activities  were  named  as:  Share  Your PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
Thoughts, Guess the Words, Read Out Loud, Language Notes , Let’s Practice, and
Let’s Perform, and Review.
3. Implementing and Evaluating the Model