Action and Observation in Cycle 2
paraphrasing them so that the students did not confuse with the questions and they understood.
R : “Dek paham ga sama apa yang diomongin tadi? Paham gas sama perintah
-
perintahnya?” Did you understand with the material we have done today?
S1
: “Udah banyak yang ngerti sie mba kata
-katanya, misalnya kalau bertanya
kita udah tahu maksud yang ditanyakan.” Yes. We understood with the instruction given to us
R
: “Oh gitu ya, menurutmu berm
anfaat ga kalau gurunya selalu pakai bahasa
inggris?” Did you think there was a benefit in using classroom English?
S2
: “Pasti mba, kita jadi terbiasa dengan kata
-kata dalam bahasa inggris, jadi
ga bingungan gitu mba.” Yes, it made us familiar with some difficult words.
Interview 8, Thursday, October 17
th
, 2013
3 Asking the students to perform their work in front of the class
The activities used in this cycle were the same as in cycle I. In this cycle, the researcher conducted some activities and then asked the students to perform
their work in front of the class. These actions were supported by giving rewards. It is expected that it would be very helpful in improving the students’ motivation to
speak up in front of the class. The description of the action for each meeting is presented below.
a. 1
st
meeting The first meeting was conducted on Thursday, October 3
rd,
2013. The text taught for the first meeting was about
spoken procedure
. The teacher told them that there was a reward, which was a plus mark if they were willing to perform
their work in front of the class voluntarily. It was successful to make them perform their work. The students participated actively and were encouraged to
speak up in front of the class voluntarily. They were challenged to get the reward.
b. 2
nd
meeting The second meeting was still about the procedure text. The students were
asked to work individually. They had to tell the procedure of how to make
Apple juice
. The students were given some minutes to make it. The researcher then monitored the students. Some of them were noisy. The number of the students
who performed their work increased than in the first meeting. They were more enthusiastic to perform because they wanted to get the reward. Gradually, their
grammar and pronunciation were better than the ones in the first cycle.
4 Giving Rewards
The students who wanted to perform their work in front of the class voluntarily were given extra points by the teacher. This action was planned based
on the findings in the previous cycle found that the students were still shy and reluctant to perform their work in front of the class voluntarily. Here, rewards
were given to make the students more enthusiastic to perform their work. By giving reward the students were motivated to perform their work. During the
cycle, this action could make the students more enthusiastic to perform. In this cycle, the number of the students coming in front of the class
voluntarily was higher than the first cycle. A half of the class performed their work in front of the class. They seemed braver and did not feel shy to speak up in
front of the class. It can be seen in the interview below.
R
: “Oya, terus ada peningkatan buat speaking kal
ian ga? Misalnya kalian jadi lebih banyak ngomong gitu?
Were there any improvements in speaking English?
S1
: “Iya mbak, sekarang sering ngomong, jadi lebih pinter speakingnya, hehehe…”
Yes, our speaking ability was improved.
R
: “Terus menurut kal
ian pemberian poin ke siswa kalo mau maju ke depan
gimana? Ada manfaatnya ga?” Were there any benefits in giving reward to the student who wanted to
perform in front of the class?
S2
: “Iya mbak, kita jadi lebih semangat ngerjain terus maju ke depan.” Yes, it made us more enthusiastic.
Interview 8, Thursday, October 17
th
, 2013
5 Giving Feedback
In cycle II the researcher always gave feedback on the students’ pronunciation. It was because some students still mispronounced some words.
After the students had finished performing their work, the researcher gave them feedback. It was done by asking the students about the correct form of their
mispronunciation before giving the researcher’s own feedback. Harmer’s 2001 stated that teachers can keep their appropriate feedback after all the activities have
been done. In this study, the researcher did not point out on the student’s mistakes
but covered all the mistakes that the students had made. In addition, Brown 2001: 275-276 states that one of principles in designing the speaking technique is that
the teacher should provide appropriate feedback and correction.