ESS 23 3. The Project Management Unit WINRIP at the related province will provide the proposed LARAP to the
WINRIP Secretary, Public Works Ministry to be furnished to the World Bank for review and approval. 4. Independent institutions will be retained as required by the Project andor Bank to periodically carry out
external monitoring and evaluation of the implementation of the LARAPs. 5. Bank may carry out an inspection of the site or location of candidate sub-projects with prior notification
to The Executing Agency PPUPMU although the inspection can be conducted independently. The result of inspection, which shall be discussed with related local government agency, shall be informed to
the Executing Agency.
8. MONITORING AND EVALUATION
8.1 Internal monitoring and reporting
Internal monitoring and reporting on the preparation and implementation of LARAPs and abbreviated LARAPs will be undertaken by the Monitoring team comprising representatives from Local Government,
project-affected people, and NGOCivil social organisation or University on a monthly basis and will include:
1. Information on consultations held during LARAP preparation and implementation; 2. Information on the delivery of compensation and rehabilitation entitlements as stipulated in the LARAP
comprising i the timely provision of compensation to individual PAPs, and ii the timely provision of rehabilitation assistance relocation and income restoration assistance to individual PAPs see Table
1 for reporting format. 3. Information on grievance redress see Table 1 for reporting format
4. The Socio-Economic Survey and Inventory of Assets Lost undertaken during the preparation of the LARAP will constitute the baseline for monitoring of implementation progress.
5. Monthly monitoring information on each sub project will be shared with the World Bank. 6. Quarterly project report will include consolidated information on the status of LARAP implementation
prepared by the PMU and submitted to the World Bank. 7. The budget for internal monitoring will be borne by local government.
8.2 External Monitoring and Evaluation
1. By the Midterm Review and by Project closure, an evaluation based on TOR approved by the Bank will be conducted by an independent consultant to assess i whether the planned compensation and
rehabilitation entitlements have been provided to the PAPs as planned in the LARAPs, and ii whether adequate income restoration measures were planned, and whether these have enabled the PAPs to at
least restore their standard of living, or whether they still face serious problems which require further assistance.
2. If the PAP has not been able to overcome income and the standard of living problems, the Local Governments will provide an extension of the assistance.
3. The budget for External Monitoring and Evaluation will be borne by the Project.
9. GRIEVANCE MECHANISM
Project affected people can submit any complaint on LARAP implementation to either Bappeda, Monitoring Team, Sub-project Manager, or the PMU-WINRIP. The Team shall respond it by conducting an investigation and
deliberation no later than twelve working days see Annex 7. For any complaint on disagreement of compensation amount the project will follow the existing regulation Perpres
362005 and 65006 and BPN No. 32007 see Annex 7.
10. TREATMENT OF INDIGENOUS VULNERABLE PEOPLE
10.1 Indigenous People and Road Development
The social and economic development of all groups of people is a long term aim of both the GOl and the World Bank. With respect to planning and development of an integrated transport network this means taking special efforts
ESS 24 to reduce the physical isolation of communities, thereby allowing them to more equitably share in the social and
economic gains of development activities available to other communities. At the same time efforts need to be made not to unduly disrupt the social values and distinct cultural traditions of indigenous peoples.
Setting out a fixed procedure for dealing with indigenous peoples is difficult since each project and types of impacts are likely to vary considerably. What is required is sensitivity to the unique needs and concerns of each group.
Planners must exercise judgment in identifying which communities and groups will require special attention.
The World Bank identifies indigenous peoples as .... social groups with a social and cultural identity distinct from the dominant society that makes them vulnerable to being disadvantaged in the development process” Operational
Directive 4.10. The concern of the World Bank is that peoples so identified share in the development process, but in a manner which does not disrupt or damage their unique socio-cultural heritage.
Isolated Vulnerable Peoples Masyarakat Terasing, previously translated as Isolated Peoples commonly referred to now as Komunitas Adat Terpencil are not necessarily culturally or ethnically different in the eyes of the GOI but are
physically residing in remote areas having poor communications and access to services.
10.2 Government of Indonesia Approach
In general terms, Bina Marga believes that the construction of newimproved roads in the vicinity of Isolated Vulnerable People provides considerable benefits to those people but accept that there are also some disbenefits to
such people. These views being based on the post construction evaluation of some projects and other reports, including the recently completed VI study Independent Monitoring and Evaluation of the Impact of Kabupaten Road
Projects on Isolated Peoples for Regions in Sumatra and Kalimantan and a similar study done by Universitas Cendrawasih in Irian Jaya.
For the purposes of Road and Bridge Development, Isolated Vulnerable Peoples are deemed to include, at least, those identified in Departement Sosials Data dan lnformasi Pemberdayaan Adat Terpencil 2002 and Basil
Pendekatan sosial Budaya 19951996. However, prior to proceeding with the detailed planningdesign of any newimproved road in a remote area, the latest available information on Isolated Vulnerable Peoples should be
obtained from the appropriate offices of Dinas Sosial at Province and Kabupaten and from the local community and NGOs.
In particular, it is thought that improved accessibility, due to the availability of a newimproved road, will provide the Isolated Vulnerable Peoples with better access to education and health facilities, and economic opportunities.
Potential disbenefits include exploitation by persons from outside of the community, a loss of identifyculture and an inability to fulfill newly created opportunities, due to a lack of trainingeducationfinancial resources.
10.3 Screening for Indigenous Peoples
