39 2. Questionnaire
The data from questionnaires was presented in percentage. The formula of the students’ answers is as follows:
Notes: : percentage of students’ answers.
: the number of students who answer. : the total number of students who finish the questionnaire.
After the percentage of students’ answers was known, the formula was
used to find out the average of each student ’s answers were as follows:
̅ Notes:
̅: average of each student’s answer. : total percentage of students’ answers.
: the number of questions. PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
40
CHAPTER IV RESEARCH RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The outline of this chapter is divided into two parts that provide research results and discussion in each part of research question. The first part is research
results and discussion of students’ narrative writing skill improvement through the
use of digital storytelling. The second part is research result and discussion of students’ perceptions on the use of digital storytelling in learning activities in
class.
A. Research Results and Discussion of Students’ Narrative Writing Skill
Improvement through the Use of Digital Storytelling
In this part, the first question of research questions was answered regarding to whether or not the use of digital storytelling helped 8
th
grade students to improve their narrative writing skill. CAR was applied in order to analyze the
students’ narrative writing skill improvements. The improvements of the students’ narrative writing skill were limited in terms of four aspects of writing.
The 8A class of SMP Negeri 1 Yogyakarta consisted of 35 students with the different kind of narrative writing abilities. They had given three times of
narrative writing tasks. The detailed of students’ narrative writing skill results are
described in Table 4.1 on the next page. PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
41
Table 4.1. The Results of Students’ Narrative Writing Skill
SN NARRATIVE
WRITING TASK 1 NARRATIVE
WRITING TASK 2 NARRATIVE
WRITING TASK 3 C
O L
M S
C O
L M
S C
O L
M S
1 22 13 12
2 61.25 24 15 18
4 76.25 24 17 21
4 82.55
2 24 17 21
5 83.75 26 18 20
5 86.25 26 19 21
5 88.75
3 22 17 22
4 81.25 24 15 23
4 82.5
22 16 18 4
75
4 17 10 18
4 61.25
- -
- -
22 13 19 3
71.25
5 24 13 18
5 75
25 15 17 5
77.5 27 18 22
5 90
6 17 10 11
3 51.25
- -
- -
17 10 7
3 46.25
7 24 17 23
5 86.25 26 18 21
5 87.5
29 20 24 5
97.5
8 24 18 18
3 78.75 27 18 21
5 88.75
- -
- -
9 17 10 11
3 51.25
- -
- -
17 10 7
3 46.25
10 23 17 18
4 77.5
25 15 21 5
82.5 27 18 25
5 93.75
11 24 17 22
4
83,75 26 18 22
5
88.75 27 19 21
5
90
12 22 16 21
5 80
25 19 22 3
86.25 -
- -
- 13
22 14 21 5
77.5
27 18 24 5
92.5
28 19 23 5
93.75
14 21 14 17
3 68.75 22 13 15
3 66.25
- -
- -
15 22 14 18
4
72.5
22 17 17 3
73.75 25 18 21
2
82.5
16 22 15 22
4 78.75 22 14 21
4 76.25 26 18 21
4 86.25
17 26 17 19
5
83.75
- -
- -
26 16 21 4
83.75
18 23 15 20
4 77.5
25 18 17 4
80 27 19 21
3 87.5
19 21 13 17
4
68.75 17 10 12
2
51.25
- -
- -
20 19 12 22
5 72.5
24 17 22 5
85 27 19 22
5 91.25
Notes: SN
: Student Number C
: Content O
: Organization L
: Language Use M
: Mechanics S
: Scores Table 4.1 shows the results of whole narrative writing tasks that were done
by 20 students. There were 8 students who did not complete the writing tasks. Meanwhile, the rest of the students are described in the next page.
42
Table 4.1. The Results of Students’ Narrative Writing Skill continued
SN NARRATIVE
WRITING TASK 1 NARRATIVE
WRITING TASK 2 NARRATIVE
WRITING TASK 3 C
O L
M S
C O
L M
S C
O L
M S
21 21 14 19 5
73.75 -
- -
- 17
11 13
4 56.25
22 21 12 15 3
63.75 -
- -
- 19
10 11
4 55
23 22 13 19 4
72.5 24 17 18
4 78.75
- -
- -
24 22 15 17 3
71.25 27 18 19 3
83.75 29 19
22 3
92.5
25 25 18 22 3
85 24 19 18
4 81.25 27
19 23
5 92.5
26 26 18 23 5
90 21 14 24
5 80
28 19
24 5
95
27 24 15 19 5
78.75 22 13 21 5
76.25 28 18
24 5
93.75
28 14 9
10 2
43.75 13 7
8 2
37.5 -
- -
- 29 24 17 23
3 83.75
- -
- -
22 15
18 3
72.5
30 13 7
10 4
42.5 -
- -
- 22
10 18
3 66.25
31 25 17 17 3
77.5
26 18 19 3
82.5
24 16
21 4
81.25
32 22 15 20 4
76.25 23 16 20 4
78.75 25 17 19 3 80
33 25 16 18 2
76.25 25 17 18
2
77.5
22 15
20 2
73.75
34 16 8
10 2
45 -
- -
- 16
8 12
2 47.5
35 17 10 18 5
62.5
23 14 19 4
75
19 13
21 5
72.5
Notes:
SN : Student Number
C : Content
O : Organization
L : Language Use
M : Mechanics
S : Scores
Table 4.1 shows the whole three meetings of students’ narrative writing tasks in one cycle. From 35 students, there were 20 students who followed the
whole three meetings and finished the narrative writing tasks completely. 15 students did not complete the whole tasks. In this case, this research focused on
those 20 students see Table 4.2 on the next page as participants of this research since they completed the whole tasks.