70
a. Language Use
S1  made  such  significant  improvement  from  the  first  to  the  second narrative writing task. In the first narrative writing task, he got 12 that were on the
level  of  fair  to  poor  language  use.  Then  in  the  second  narrative  writing  task,  he got 18 that were on the level of good to average language use. While in the third
narrative  writing  task,  the  level  was  still  the  same  with  the  second  narrative
writing task, but the score increased from 18 to 21.
Focusing  on  the  language  use,  the  writer  found  that  there  were  some mistakes  found on the tenses agreement on the first writing  task. S1  did  not  pay
attention to the tenses that should be used in narrative writing. He wrote the story with simple past tense, but some words were still in the simple present tense such
as “chase”, “has” and “doesn’t”. They should be written: “chased”, “had” and “did not”.
On the second narrative writing task, he started to focus on the simple past tense.  There  was  no  simple  present  tense  found  in  the  second  writing  task.
However, the language use mistakes  were found in  the first and third paragraph. S1 turned out using simple present progressive tense. The words “has been” was
found  in  the  first  and  third  paragraph.  He  should  omit  those  words  in  order  to make a good tense agreement of simple past tense. The language use of the third
writing task was better than the second writing task. There was one mistake found in the word “broke” that should be written in the simple present tense. He did not
make  any  mistake  on  the  use  of  pronouns  or  prepositions.  He  learned  to  be
consistent of the use simple past tense in narrative writing.
71
b. Mechanics
S1  had  a  very  poor  mechanics  aspect  on  the  first  narrative  writing  task with  score  2.  He  had  some  improvements  on  the  second  and  third  narrative
writing task. He got 4 that means his mechanical writing was on the level of good
to average.
In the first narrative writing task, in which he did not put capitalize on the whole first letters in the beginning of each sentence. He might not pay attention to
the use of capital letter in the beginning of the sentences. He might think whether he  used  capital  letter  or  not,  it  would  never  affect  to  the  sentence  meaning  or
construction,  whereas  they  were  became  totally  big  mistakes  on  the  mechanical aspect  of  writing.  His  structure  of  sentence  was  not  in  a  good  order  because  he
provided  additional  word  above  the  sentence  in  order  to  revise  into  good sentences. His bad handwriting also became a problem in order to understand the
content of the story. For that reason, he got a really poor score in the first writing
task.
While in the second and third narrative writing task, he started to write in a good handwriting. The reader could easily read the content of the story better than
the first writing task story. He also made improvements in the use of capital letter in  the  beginning  of  the  sentences.  He  applied  what  was  being  instructed  and
explained by the teacher.