Table 50. The Summary of the Homogenity Result of Self-Confidence Data Source
Levene Statistic df1
df2 P-Value
Conclusion Pre-Test
2,936 6
11 0,058
Homogenous Post-Test
2,426 6
11 0,096
Homogenous
Table 51. The Summary of the Homogenity Result of Learning Independence Data Source Levene Statistic
df1 df2
P-Value Conclusion
Pre-Test 2,166
6 11
0,117 Homogenous
Post-Test 1,656
6 11
0,183 Homogenous
The above table showed that the homogenity the result of self- confidence was proven by p-value. P-value for Pre-Test was 0.058 and
for Post-Test was 0.096. It meant that the data of Pre-Test and Post-Test were homogenous. Moreover, for the homogenity result of self-
confidence was also proven by p-value. P-value for Pre-Test was 0.117 and for Post-Test was 0.187. It meant that the data of Pre-Test and Post-
Test were homogenous.
8. Hypotheses Test
Hypothesis was the temporary answer to the formulated problems. The research hypothesis was written to see the differences in
the degree of self-confidence and learning independence after treatment given to the expeerimental class in the form of the Internet-based
learning and without treatment given to the control class. Moreover it was written to see whether there was an improvement or not in the
degree of sef-confidence and learning independence in the class learned by using the Internet.
H1 : there was differences in self-confidence between students
learned by using the Internet as learning source and those learned without using the Internet as learning source.
H2 : there was differences in learning independence between
students learned by using the Internet as learning source and those learned without using the Internet as learning source.
H3 : learning by using the Internet as learning source could improve
students’ self-confidence. H4
: learning without by using the Internet as learning source could improve students’ learning independence.
Hypotheses test was conducted by employing Anova and T-Test to detemine whether there was differences in the mean score between
students learned by using the Internet and those learned without using the Internet. Moreover, whether there was an improvement in self-
confidence and learning independence between students learned by using the Internet.
From two previous tables of analysis requirements, it was foudn that both samples were normally distributed and homogenous, then
analysis calculation could be conducted by using Anova Test and T-Test Separated Variance. The following were the data and the calculation
result by using Anova Test and T-Test Separated Variance. Table 52. Data Analysis of the Result of Anova Test towards H1
Data Source df
F P-value
Conclusion Experimental Class Post-Test
27 9.358 0.001
H1 was accepted Control Class Post-Test
The above table showed that the scores obtained were distributed to the formula and it was obtained P-value 0.001 which was less than
0,05 which meant that there was differences. Based on the above analysis, it could be concluded that H1 argued that there was differences
in self-confidence between students learned by using the Internet and those learned without using the Internet was accepted.
Table 53. Data Analysis of the Result of Anova Test towards H2 Data Source
Df F
P-value Conclusion
Experimental Class Post-Test 26
3.154 0.018
H2 was accepted Contro Class Post-Test
The above table showed that the scored obtained were distributed to the formula and it was obtained P-value 0.018 which was less than
0.05 which meant that there was differences. Based on the above analysis, it could be concluded that H2 argued that there was differences
in learning independence between students learned by using the Internet and those learned without using the Internet was accepted.
Table 54. Data Analysis of the Result of T-Test towards H3 Data Spurce
Mean N
Standard Deviation
Sig. 2- tailed
Conclusion Experimental
Class Pre-Test
78.29 28 7.659
0.007 H3 was
accepted Experimental
Class Post-Test
83.07 28 7.493
Based on the above table, mean score of experimental class when Post-Test was given was 83.07 with standard deviation 7.493 which this
score was higher than mean score when Pre-Test was given which was 78.29 with standard deviation 7.659. It meant that the differences in
mean score 4.78. Besides, the score of test of difference using T-Test in the degree of Sig. 2-tailed was 0.007 less than 0.05 which meant that
there was significant differences in self-confidence between experimental and control class. It could be concluded that H3 argued that
there was an imporvement in self-confidence of student learned by using the Internet was accepted.
Table 55. Data Analysis of the Result of T-Test towards H4 Data Source
Mean N
Standard Deviation
Sig. 2- tailed
Conclusion Experimental Pre-Test
61 28
6.423 0.030
H4 was accepted
Control Post-Test 63.32 28
5.843
Based on the above table, mean score of experimental when Post- Test was given was 61 with standard deviation 6.423 which this score
was higher than mean score when Pre-Test was given which was 63.32 with standard deviation 5.843. It meant that the differences in score mean
was 2.32. Besides, the score of test differences using T-Test in the degree of Sig. 2-tailed was 0.030 less than 0.05 which meant that there was
significant differences in learning independence of experimental class before and after the Internet was implemented. It could be concluded that
H4 argued that there was an improvement in learning independence of students learned by using the Internet was accepted.
B. Discussion
1. There was differences in self-confidence betwen students learned by using the Internet as learning source and those learned without using the Internet
as learning source. Based on the result of the first hypothesis test H1 it was found that
there was differences in self-confidence between students learned by using the Internet as learning source and those learned without using the Internet
as learning source was accepted. It was proven by the result of Anova test which was 0.001 which was less than 0.05 which meant that there was
differences. This result showed that there was differences in self-confidence between class learned by using the Internet as learning source and those
