The Middle-Lower Housing References Kaiser F.G., Wolfing S, Fuhrer U. 1999. Environmental Attitude
and Manifestation, Medan, 13
th
- 14
th
November 2007
352 From the analysis result of average value, so that can be
interpreted that denunciating consumer to developer for The Middle-Lower Housing are listed as follows: indoor installation,
door-window, floor, plafond, roof, wall, finishing and exterior and interior.
c. The Merger of Two Housing
Table 4: Average value of merger housing
Research Variables Average Value
Wall 4.1435
Floor 3.6900
Door-window 4.3760
Roof 3.6815
Plafond 3.7825
Indoor installation 4.1935
Finishing 3.6450
Exterior and interior 3.4355
4,144 3,69
4,376 3,6815
3,7825 4,1935
3,645 3,4355
Wall Floor
Door-window Roof
Plafond Indoor Installation
Finishing Ext-Interior
Figure 3. Average value of merger housing From the analysis result of average value, so that can be
interpreted that denunciating consumer to developer for The Merger of Housing are listed as follows: door-window, indoor
installation, wall, plafond, floor, roof, finishing and exterior and interior.
Conclusions
The analysis result shows that denunciating of consumer to result of developer for The Middle-Upper Housing are listed as
follows: door-windows, wall, indoor installation, floor, roof, plafond, finishing and exterior and interior. For The Middle-Lower
Housing are listed as follows: indoor installation, door-window, floor, plafond, roof, wall, finishing and exterior and interior. And
for The Merger of Housing are listed as follows: door-window,
and Manifestation, Medan, 13
th
- 14
th
November 2007
353 indoor installation, wall, plafond, floor, roof, finishing and exterior
and interior. References
Best R.J. 2000 Market-Based Management. Second Edition.
New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Gaspersz V. 2002 Total Quality Management. Jakarta:
Gramedia Pustaka Utama. Hanna N., Wozniak R. 2001 Consumer Behaviour: An Applied
Approach. New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Landin A., Carl-Henric N. 2001 Do Quality Systems Really Make
A Difference. Journal of Building Research and Information. 291: 12-20
Miles M.E. et.al 2000 Real Estate Development: Principles and Process. Third Edition. Washington DC: Urban Land
Institute. Mowen, J.C. 1993 Consumer Behaviour. Third Edition. New
York: MacMillan Publishing Company. Santoso B. 2000. Realestate: Sebuah Konsep ilmu dan
Problema Pengembang Indonesia. Jakarta: School of Real Estate.
Wurtzebach C.H., Mike, E.M. 1994 Modern Real Estate. Fifth Edition. New York: John Wiley Sons.
and Manifestation, Medan, 13
th
- 14
th
November 2007
354
UNDERSTANDING URBAN KAMPONG IN INDONESIAN URBANITY
Case Study: Kapongs in The City Center of Bandung
Yohanes Basuki Dwisusanto
Department of Architecture, Parahyangan Catholic University, Bandung-Indonesia Corresponding author: jbasehome.unpar.ac.id
Abstract
The kampong as a physical and social reality of Indonesian cities has been officially recognized since the
beginning of the 20th century and yet is still believed to be an important element of urban character. The history of urban
development has proved that kampongs can accommodate the majority of urban dwellers although their existence is recurrently
mistreated. The kampong is an inseparable part and unique character of the city and has contributed to shaping Indonesian
urbanity.
Kampong phenomenon has recently attracted a significant number of studies. Unfortunately, these investigations
are rarely undertaken in the framework of explaining its spatial and architectural aspects. Indeed, there is a need for studies to
elucidate the spatial linkage between kampong and the city as a whole. This study aims to reveal and elucidate the spatial
linkages between the kampong and the periphery of its urban block in order to comprehend the position of the urban kampong
in Indonesian urbanity.
Important findings of this study consist of the following: First, a way of looking at the kampong as a reality. As a reality,
the kampong is an accordance between social and spatial organization. Second, permeability of the kampong’s frame
affects the spatial linkage between the kampong and its urban block.
There are at least three kinds of contribution that can be offered by this study. First, the enrichment of the architectural
vocabulary of theory and methodology to deal with the issues of the kampong in the city. Second, propositions for the
improvement of kampong settlements in the city center. Third, recommendations for policy-makers to develop a sounder and
more equitable urban development policies and strategies. Keywords: kampong, urbanity, spatial linkages, kampong framing.
and Manifestation, Medan, 13
th
- 14
th
November 2007
355