were five experts who gave comments to the developed materials. They were two experts of materials of English For Children and
three Elementary English teachers. There were three steps conducted to show the reliability of the questionnaire. First, the
questionnaire was administrated to the experts. There are 5 possible points; 5 points for Strongly Agree SA, 4 points for
Agree A, 3 points for Neutral N, 2 points for Disagree DA, and 1 point for Strongly Disagree SA. Second, the questionnaires
were recapitulated after all the questionnaires were given back to the researcher. Third, the Alpha Cronbach formula was used to find
the reliability coefficient of the questionnaire.
3. Third Questionnaire
The third questionnaire was administrated to the students after the implementation of the developed materials. It was aimed at finding
students’ opinions about the developed materials. There were 20 questions in the questionnaire.
a. Validity For the validity measures, the researcher used construct
validity. To obtain the construct validity, the researcher consulted the outline of the questionnaire to the first supervisor
to know whether or not the questionnaire was capable of giving the information about students’ opinions towards the developed
materials. The researcher took some questions related to the
students’ profile, the relation between the goals of the developed materials and students’ needs, the contents of the
developed materials, the varieties of the tasks and activities, the clarity of the instructions, and the general layoutof the
developed materials Nunan, 2004; Harmer, 2001; Brown, 2001. Here below is the organization of the third
questionnaire.
Table 5: The Blueprint of the Third Questionnaire for Implementation
The purpose of the question
The content of the question
Item number
References
To find information about
students’ profile Name
Age Sex
Part A Masuhara via
Tomlinson 1998: 240
To find information to
evaluate the relation between
the developed materials and the
students’ needs The goal of
the materials
Students’
1, 2, 4, 7, 9, 13, 18
Nunan 2004: 175
To find information to
evaluate the quality od the
developed materials and
Content Variety of
tasks and activities
Clarity of the
3, 5, 6, 8, 10, 11,
14 Brown 2001:
142 Nunan 2004:
175 Harmer
1992: 279
activities instructions
To get information about
the students’ opinions related
to the format of the developed
materials Typesetting
Illustrations General
layout 12, 15,
16, 17, 19, 20
Brown 2001: 142
b. Reliability There were three steps conducted to show the reliability of
the questionnaire. First, the questionnaire was administrated to 23 students as the subject of the study. There are 5 possible
points; 5 points for Strongly Agree SA, 4 points for Agree A, 3 points for Neutral N, 2 points for Disagree DA, and 1
point for Strongly Disagree SA. Second, the questionnaires were recapitulated after all the questionnaires were given back
to the researcher. Third, the Alpha Cronbach formula was used to find the reliability coefficient of the questionnaire.
4. Observation Guide
