The Expert Judgement on the Third Draft of Materials

2 The appropriateness of the language Table 42. The Descriptive Statistic of Expert’s Opinion on the Appropriateness of the Language Used in the Third Draft of Materials No Items Means Description of Agreement 1 The appropriateness to the learners’ language development 4.00 Agree 2 The use of communicative language 4.25 Strongly Agree 3 The accuracy of the language 4.00 Agree 4 The sequencing and the unity of ideas 4.00 Agree Table 42 above shows the opinion of the materials expert about the language which is used in the third draft of materials. The expert generally agreed on the appropriateness of the language used in the third draft of materials. It is shown on Table that the language appropriateness was achieved by the third draft of materials as the mean value is above 4.00. Therefore, the language used in the third draft of materials is categorised as appropriate based on the standards proposed by BNSP. 3 The appropriateness of materials presentation Table 43. The Descriptive Statistic of Expert’s Opinion on the Appropriateness of the Materials Presentation of the Third Draft of Materials No Items Means Description of Agreement 1 The technique of presentation 4.37 Strongly Agree 2 Learning presentation 4.62 Strongly Agree Based on Table above, the expert generally agreed on the appropriateness of materials presentation of the third draft of materials. It is shown on Table that the overall standards about materials presentation appropriateness were accomplished by the third draft of materials as the lowest value of the mean is 4.37. Therefore, the materials presentation of the third draft of materials is categorised as appropriate based on the standard proposed by BNSP . 4 The appropriateness of materials layout Table 44. The Descriptive statistic of expert’s Opinion on the Appropriateness of the Materials Layout of the Third Draft of Materials No Items Means Description of Agreement 1 The layout of the content 4.58 Strongly Agree 2 The illustration of the content 4.58 Strongly Agree 3 The typography of the materials 4.16 Agree Based on Table 44, the means value of the items range from 4.16 to 4.58. It indicates that the expert agreed on the appropriateness of the layout of the third draft of materials based on the standard of appropriate learning materials. The overall standards about the materials layout appropriateness were achieved by the third draft of materials as presented in Table. Therefore, the materials presentation of the third draft of materials is categorised as appropriate based on the standards proposed by BNSP. Finally, the conclusion from the results above is that the third draft of materials has accomplished the standards of appropriateness of learning materials. The conclusion is based on the materials expert’s opinion which indicates the