The Expert Judgement on the First Draft of Materials

The appropriateness of the contents of the materials can be achieved if it shows the mean value of 4.00. Table 25 above is the summary from the expert judgement questionnaire which covers three general items of the contents appropriateness in term of the contents. The appropriateness had not been approved by the materials expert as shown in Table 25 above. Therefore, the content of the first draft of materials is categorized as inappropriate based on the standards proposed by BNSP. 2 The appropriateness of the language Table 26. The Descriptive Statistic of Expert’s Opinion on the Appropriateness of the Language used in the First Draft of Materials No Items Means Description of Agreement 1 The appropriateness to the learners’ language development 3.50 Agree 2 The use of communicative language 4.00 Agree 3 The accuracy of the language 3.50 Agree 4 The sequencing and the unity of ideas 3.50 Agree Table 26 above shows the opinion of the materials expert about the language which is used in the first draft of materials. The expert generally agrees on the appropriateness of the language used in the first draft of materials. It is shown on Table that the language appropriateness was not achieved by the first draft of materials as the mean value is below 4.00. Therefore, the language used in the first draft of materials is categorised as appropriate based on the standards proposed by BNSP. 3 The appropriateness of materials presentation Table 27. The Descriptive Statistic of Expert’s Opinion on the Appropriateness of the Materials Presentation of the First Draft of Materials No Items Means Description of Agreement 1 The technique of presentation 4.25 Strongly Agree 2 Learning presentation 3.87 Agree Based on the table above, the expert generally agreed on the appropriateness of materials presentation of the first draft of materials. It is shown on the table that the overall standards about materials presentation appropriateness were accomplished by the first draft of materials as the mean value is 4.06. Therefore, the materials presentation of the first draft of materials is categorised as appropriate based on the standard proposed by BNSP. 4 The appropriateness of materials layout Table 28. The Descriptive Statistic of Expert’s Opinions on the Appropriateness of the Materials Layout of the First Draft of Materials No Items Means Description of Agreement 1 The layout of the content 4.16 Agree 2 The illustration of the content 4.00 Agree 3 The typography of the materials 4.00 Agree Based on Table 28, the means value of the items range from 4.00 to 4.16. It indicates that the expert agreed on the appropriateness of the layout of the first draft of materials based on the standard of appropriate learning materials. The