Western I ndonesia National Roads I mprovement Project 4 - 5
ANNEX P-2 Executive Summary Report present a more detailed status of the Contract Package. Package No. 3 : Manggopoh
Padang Sawah
Based on the revised work schedule, the current overall work progress of only 85.01
against scheduled progress of
95.17 since the works commenced 22 months ago is of much concern due
to the very limited remaining contract time of only 2 months, As of end of this month, the remaining contract time is only 72 calendar days with still 14.99 of
the works to be completed.
For the Contractor to deliver the completion of the contract package on the target date of completion on January 5, 2016, a per month progress of minimum 7.50 shall be attained until
the end of the contract time.
With the huge projected progress output of 7.5 per month for the three 2 months of the contract time for the project to be handed over on time, it is doubtful the completion date can be
met, unless the Contractor address all the current problems.
A more detailed status of the project progress are shown in ANNEX P-3 Executive Summary Report .
Package No. 4 : Ipuh Bantal
The current status of this contract package still remain in critical situation with respect to completion date on January 9, 2016.
During this period October 2015, only 4.65 progress has been attained and actual overall progress as of month s end is 53.17.
As the contract time of only 2 months with still 46.83 remaining works to be done, it seems the target date of completion on January 9, 2016 cannot be met.
In order for the contractor to complete the project on time at the target date of completion, an average of at least 23.42 progress per month for the last 2 remaining months have to be
attained.
Based on the Contractor s performance during the last 22 months of the current contract, attaining the highest progress archive only 11,21, the possibility of completing the remaining
works is very remote.
Shown in ANNEX P-4 Executive Summary Report showing the details and status of the project. Package No. 5 : Sp. Rampa
Poriaha
To date, since the commencement of works started four 4 and half months ago, the actual physical work progress is 2.72 against scheduled work progress of 15.14. The delayed works
further slid down from -7.20 last month to -12.43 at the end of this month.
The problem that hampered the slow progress of the works is the unexpected ROW problems wherein some improvements such as trees and other obstructions exist along the alignment.
ANNEX P-5 Executive Summary Report shows the Contractor s Progress Schedule. Package No. 6 : Kerkap
Ps. Pedati
Western I ndonesia National Roads I mprovement Project 4 - 6
Actual overall physical work accomplished as of this reporting period is 15.13 out of 25.82 schedule or -10.69 negative slippage. Works during the month were mainly on the Earthworks,
Structures, Granular Pavement and Routine Maintenance Work items.
ANNEX P-6 Executive Summary Report shows the complete details of the contract package. Package No. 11 : Bantal - Mukomuko
The actual overall progress attained by the Contractor up to end of this period is 17.23 against 20.01 schedule.
For more details of the Contract Package, refer to ANNEX P-11 Executive Summary Report . Package No. 13 : Sp. Rukis
Tj. Kemuning
This sub-project is still in the early stage of construction. Actual work progress is only 2.19 and slightly behind schedule by -1.98.
The works done during the month were mobilization, earthwork and granular pavement.
Details of the work progress are shown in ANNEX P-13 Executive Summary Reports. Package No. 17 : Sp. Gunung Kemal
Pg. Tampak
This sub-project is still in the early stage of construction. Actual work progress is only 1.13. Against 0.70 schedule. The works done during the month is mobilization.
Package No. 19 : Lais Bintunan
To date , based on revised schedule and corrections of progress figures in previous months, the cumulative work accomplished is 49.74, out of the 58.19 scheduled at month s end.
Complete details of the contract package are shown in ANNEX P-19 Executive Summary Report
4.5 Quality Assurance
The DSC will be responsible for quality assurance of materials and workmanship, certifying whether or not contractors have achieved the required results, as well as documentation and
reporting based on the financial management plan. They will prepare a Quality Assurance system covering all subprojects, and continuously monitor the effectiveness of their supervision
procedures. Following are current problems which were the same problems during the preceeding month and
issues relative to the execution of the works and quality assurance: Package No.1 : Krui - Biha
a Inadequate cash flow. b Inadequate number of manpower.
c Inadequate number of Contractor s Laboratory personnel to perform daily test
requirements and quality control activities. d Contract Amendment 04 for time extention was approved by DGH on August 27, 2015 and
the construction period changed to 733 calendar day. Package No.2 : Padang Sawah
Sp. Empat a Late start of Air Gadang Bridge.
Western I ndonesia National Roads I mprovement Project 4 - 7
b For Road Construction still need additional land acquisition to lay down one by one Cutting Slope.
Package No.3 : Manggopoh Padang Sawah a Still need additional land acquisition to construct retaining wall on the of embankment.
Package No.4 : Ipuh - Bantal a Insufficient numbers of equipment.
b Mismanagement between the joint operation partners. c Insufficient manpower to execute the works on drainage structures.
d Low output of rock crusher. e Big percentage of works are still to be done with few months left of the contract time.
f
Insufficient number of staff of DSC Supervision Team to supervise the work. Package No.5 : Sp. Rampa - Poriaha
a Field Engineering still to finalized. Package No.6 : Ps. Pedati - Kerkap
b Field Engineering shall be completed as soon as possible. Package No.11 : Bantal - Mukomuko
a Field Engineering has been done and approved by DGH on October 23, 2015. Package No.13 : Sp. Rukis
Tj. Kemuning a Contractor have to submit Work Progress Schedule for review and approval.
Package No.19 : Lais - Bintunan a Field Engineering shall be completed as soon as possible.
4.6 Environmental and Social Considerations
4.6.1 Current Overall Situation
4.6.1 Current Overall Situation
A project category is assigned to each package as either Category A, B or C depending on the likely degree of influence on environmental issues with a brief explanation as follows:
Category A project is one which will have a significant negative impact on the environment and may have an influence on areas outside the actual project area. A project classified as such
requires an AMDAL ANDAL, RKLRPL study.
Category B project is one which affects the people or the environment to some extent but with a smaller impact than a Category A. The required environmental analysis is a UKLUPL study only.
Category C project has minimal effect on the people or environment and an environmental analysis is not required. SPPL are used to handle any minor problem which may arise.
Details of packages that require environmental and social safeguard are given in Appendix E and the following Table 4.3 provides a summary of the work involved in the 21 WINRIP packages.
All the twenty one 21 packages require environmental impact investigations and studies which need the approval by Environmental Agency BLH.
Nine 9 of the twenty one 21 packages are categorized under Category A projects wherein
Western I ndonesia National Roads I mprovement Project 4 - 8
AMDALEIA studies are required and have to be approved by World Bank. The nine 9 packages are covered only by five 5 AMDALEIA studies as some single study covers a combination of two
2 or three 3 sub-projects as indicated in Table 4.3. While 21 social studies SLARAP and LARAP require the approval of the World Bank. Up to the end of September 2015, all the 22
environmental studies for the twenty one 21 sub-projects including a separate study UKLUPL for Air Gadang Bridge on Package No.2 were approved by BLH with 5 of these studies AMDALEIA
were granted No Objection Letter NOL from the World Bank while all the 21 social studies LARAP were already issued No Objection Letter NOL from the World Bank.
Table 4.3
Works Program
No of Packages
No of Investigations Approval by
Remarks BLH
World Bank
AWP-1 4
9 1 - AMDAL
2 - UKLUPL 2 - SPPL
4 - Full LARAP 1 - AMDAL
2 - UKLUPL 2 - SPPL
1 - EIA No Need
No Need 4 - Full LARAP
Coverage of Single AMDALEIA study are
the following Packages : a Packages 1 and 17
b Package 7,12 and 14
c Package 11 and 16 d Package 8
e Package 10 AWP-2
9 18
5 - AMDAL 4 - UKLUPL
1 - Simple LARAP 8 - Full LARAP
5 - AMDAL 4 - UKLUPL
4 - EIA No Need
1 - SLARAP 8 - Full LARAP
AWP-3 8
16 3 - AMDAL
5 - UKLUPL 8 - Full LARAP
3 - AMDAL 5 - UKLUPL
1 - EIA No Need
8 - Full LARAP
Total 21
43 Env=22,Soc=21
22 Env= 5, Soc=21
Note: 1 UKL UPL do not need a NOL from WB, and SPPL not necessary to submit to the WB. 2 Packages 9 and 18 to be deleted.
3 Air Gadang Bridge have separate investigation, hence, total equals 22.
Appendix E shows the Progress of Environmental Safeguard Studies. 4.6.2
Environmental and Social Issues
This section outlines the activities of the Social Impact Specialist and the Environmental Specialist during October 2015.
4.6.2.1 Environmental Issues
The main environmental issues, specifically on the AWP-1 packages are the implementation of mitigating measures on pollution of spilled oil, grease and solid waste in the Contractors Base
Camps. Air and dust pollution along stretches of thickly populated areas are not properly addressed by the Contractors. Water spraying is not continuously implemented. Dump trucks
transporting construction material are not fully covered and traffic management plan is not fully implemented.
Environmental issues on each of the individual sub-projects Packages are shown in Appendix E of
this Report.
Monitoring of Environmental Aspects During Construction
CTC provided revised monitoring forms to DSC and Contractor for use in monitoring of environmental and social impacts. These forms are to be used every month by the DSC
