Kesimpulan Implikasi Kebijakan Saran Penelitian Lebih Lanjut

serta menurut sektoral di setiap provinsi. Hal ini untuk dapat menganalisa tentang pro poor growth secara lebih detail di tingkat provinsi. 2. Perlu ditambahkan variabel yang mengindikasikan karakteristik setiap provinsi misalnya kepulauan dalam menganalisa faktor-faktor yang berpengaruh terhadap pro poor growth, mengingat derajat pro poor growth yang beragam antar provinsi. Implikasi kebijakan yang diperoleh diharapkan lebih spesifik dapat diterapkan di masing-masing provinsi. 3. Mengingat variabel investasi pemerintah berpengaruh terhadap poverty reduction sedangkan pengeluaran investasi merupakan pengeluaran yang dapat dirasakan manfaatnya dalam jangka panjang, sehingga perlu kiranya ditambahkan periode waktu penelitian untuk dapat melihat pengaruhnya terhadap pengentasan kemiskinan. Halaman ini sengaja dikosongkan DAFTAR PUSTAKA [ADB] Asian Development Bank. 2007-2008. Proyek Perencanaan dan Penganggaran yang Berpihak pada Kaum Miskin. Kertas Kerja ADB TA 4762 INO. Jakarta Baltagi, Badi H. 2005. Econometric Analysis of Panel Data. Third Edition. John Wiley and Sons, Ltd. West Sussex. [BI] Bank Indonesia. 2005-2009. Kajian Ekonomi Regional Kuartalan Tingkat Provinsi. www.bi.go.id Bappenas. 2008. Handbook Pro Poor Planning and Budgeting. Jakarta. Bappenas. 2010.Lampiran Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 5 Tahun 2010 tentang Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Menengah Nasional RPJMN Tahun 2010-2014 . Jakarta Bellinger, W. K. 2007. The Economics Analysis of Public Policy. Routledge. Oxon. Birner, Regina, Resnick, Danielle. 2010. The Political Economy Policies for Smallholder Agriculture. World Development Report;3810:1442-1452. Bourguignon, F. 2004. The Poverty-Growth-Inequality Triangle. World Bank. Washington, DC. [BPS] Badan Pusat Statistik. Website BPS, berbagai publikasi. www.bps.go.id [BPS] Badan Pusat Statistik. 2007-2009. Berita Resmi Statistik. Jakarta. [BPS] Badan Pusat Statistik. 2002-2009. Data dan Informasi Kemiskinan. BPS. Jakarta [BPS] Badan Pusat Statistik. 2008. Analisis dan Penghitungan Tingkat Kemiskinan 2008 . Jakarta [BPS] Badan Pusat Statistik. 2009. Analisis dan Penghitungan Tingkat Kemiskinan 2009 . Jakarta Contreras, Dante. 2001. Economic Growth and Poverty Reduction by Region: Chile 1990-96. Development Policy Review;193:291-302. Oxford. Datt, G. and Ravallion, M. 1992. Growth and Redistribution Components of Changes in Poverty Measures: A Decomposition with Application to Brazil and India in the 1980s. Journal of Development Economics;38: 275- 295. Departemen Sosial RI. 2005. Pokok-pokok Pikiran Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Panjang PJP Tahun 2005-2009 dan Pembangunan Jangka Menengah PJM Tahun 2004-2009 Bidang Kesejahteraan Sosial. Jakarta. Dollar, D. and Kraay, A., 2002, ‘Growth is Good for the Poor’. Journal of Economic Growth ;7:195–225. Dornbusch, Rudiger, Stanley Fischer, Richard Startz. 2001. Macroeconomics, 8th Edition. McGraw-Hill, New York Drukker, David M. 2003. Testing for Serial Correlation in Linear Panel-Data Models. The Stata Jurnal;32:168-177. Fan, S. 2004. Infrastructure and Pro-poor Growth. OECD DACT POVNET Agriculture and Pro Poor Growth Workshop Paper. 17-18 June. Helsinki. Fan, S. and S. Thorat. 1999. Linkages between Government Spending, Growth, and Poverty in Rural India. International Food Policy Research Institute. Washington, D.C. Foster, James, Greer, Joel and Thorbecke. Erik. 1984. A class of decomposable poverty measures. Econometrica;523:761-766. Geda, Jong, Niek de, Kimenyi, Mwangi S, and Mwabu, Germano. 2005. Determinants of Poverty in Kenya: a Household Level Analysis. Working Paper . University of Connecticut. Connecticut. Gelaw, Fekadu. 2010. The dynamic relationship among poverty, inequality,and growth in rural Ethiopia: A micro evidence. Journal of Development and Agricultural Economics ;25:197-208, ISSN 2006- 9774, http:www.academicjournals.orgJDAE Greene, William H. 2002. Econometric Analysis, Fifth Edition. Prentice Hall, New Jersey. Grimm, Michael, Klasen, Stephan, and Mckay, Andrew. 2007. DETERMINANTS OF PRO POOR GROWTH: Analytical Issues and Findings from Country Cases . Palgrave, Mcmillan. Gujarati, Damodar N. 2004. Basic Econometrics. Fourth Edition. The McGraw- Hill Companies. New York. Hajiji, Ajid. 2010. Analisis Pertumbuhan Ekonomi, Ketimpangan Pendapatan,dan Kemiskinan di Propinsi Riau. [Tesis]. IE-IPB. Bogor. Hardin, James W. 1995. Prais-Winsten Regression. A Publication to Promote Communication among Stata Users. Stata Technical Bulletin. South Salem, New York. Institut Pertanian Bogor dan PT. Pertani. 2010. Dampak Bantuan Langsung Pupuk dan Benih Unggul terhadap Usaha Tani dan Perekonomian Nasional. Final Report. Pusat Studi Pembangunan Pertanian dan Pedesaan. IPB dan PT. Pertani. Bogor Indra. 2008. Analisis Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Kemiskinan di Indonesia. IE- IPB. Bogor. Iradian, Garbis. 2005. Inequality, Poverty, and Growth: Cross-Country Evidence. IMF Working Paper, WP0528. International Monetary Fund, Middle East and Central Asia Department. Kakwani, N. 1993. Poverty and Economic Growth with Application to Cote D’Ivoire. Review of Income and Wealth;39:121-139. Kakwani, N. 2000. On Measuring Growth and Inequality Components of Poverty with application to Thailand. Journal of Quantitative Economics;161:67– 80. Kakwani, N and Pernia, Ernesto M. 2000. What is Pro Poor Growth? Asian Development Review ;181. Kakwani, N. S. Khandker and Son, H.H. 2004. Pro-Poor Growth: Concepts and Measurement with Country Case Studies. United Nations Development Programme International Poverty Centre. Working Paper, Vol 1. Brasilia. Kakwani, N and Son, H.H. 2006. Pro-poor Growth: The Asian Experience. UNU- WIDER. Research Paper, No. 200656. Brasilia. Klasen, Stephan. 2007. Determinants of Pro Poor Growth. International Food Policy Research Institute . Washington, DC. Kuznets, Simon. 1955. Economic Growth and Income Inequality. The American Economic Review ;451:1-28. Kraay, Aart. 2006. When is growth pro-poor? Evidence from a panel of countries. Journal of Development Economics ;80:198– 227. Mankiw, N. Gregory. 2007. Teori Makro Ekonomi. Edisi Keenam. Penerbit Erlangga. Jakarta. Mukherjee, Sanjukta and Benson, Todd. 2003. The Determinants of Poverty in Malawi,1998. World Development Report;312:339-358. Nafziger, E. Wayne. 2006. Economic Development. Fourth Edition. Cambridge University Press. New York. Nuñez, J and S. Espinosa. 2005. Pro-Poor Growth and Pro-Poor Programs in Colombia. Documento Cede 2005-51. http:www.ideas.repeg.org Nuryartono, Nunung, Zeller, Manfred, and Schwarze, Stefan. 2005. Credit Rationing of Farm Households and Agricultural Production: Empirical Evidence in The Rural Areas of Central Sulawesi Indonesia. Conference on International Agricultural Research for Development. October 11-13, 2005. Stuttgart-Hohenheim. Priyarsono, D.S. H. Reinhart dan Widyastutik. 2008. Ekonomi Publik: 1-9. Universitas Terbuka. Jakarta. Ravallion, M. 2004. Defining pro-poor growth: a response to Kakwani. International Poverty Center. Vol. 4, November 2004. UNDP. Ravallion, M. 2005. A Poverty-Inequality Trade-off? World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, No. 3579. Ravallion, M. and S. Chen. 2001. Measuring Pro-poor Growth. Economic Letters ;781:93-99. Ravallion, M. and Datt, G. 2001. Why has Economic growth been more pro-poor in some states of India than Others. Journals of Development Economic;68 2002:381-400. Royat, Sujana. 2008. Kebijakan Pemerintah dalam Penanggulangan Kemiskinan. Deputi Menko Kesra Bidang Koordinasi Penanggulangan Kemiskinan. Jakarta. Saptana dan Ashari. 2007. Pembangunan Pertanian Berkelanjutan melalui Kemitraan Usaha. Jurnal Litbang Pertanian;264. Sekretariat Negara Republik Indonesia. 2007. UU No. 17 Tahun 2007. Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Panjang Nasional Tahun 2005 – 2025 . Jakarta. Sekretaris Negara Republik Indonesia. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 33 Tahun 2004 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional . Jakarta. Sekretaris Negara Republik Indonesia. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 tentang Perimabangan Keuangan antara Pemerintah Pusat dan Pemerintah Daerah . Jakarta. Sen, Amartya. 1976. Poverty: an Ordinal Approach to Measurement. Econometrica ;442:219-231. Shorrocks, A. F. 1999. Decomposition Procedures for Distributional Analysis: A Unified Framework Based on the Shapley Value. University of Essex. Colchester. Siregar, H dan D. Wahyuniarti. 2007. Dampak Pertumbuhan Ekonomi terhadap Penurunan Jumlah Penduduk Miskin. MB-IPB. Bogor Son, H. H. 2003. A Note on Pro Poor Growth. Economic Letters;822004:307- 314. Suparno. 2010. Analisis Pertumbuhan Ekonomi dan Pengurangan Kemiskinan: Studi Pro Poor Growth Policy di Indonesia. [Tesis]. IE-IPB. Bogor Suryadarma, D. dan A. Suryahadi. 2007. The Impact of Private Growth Sector on Poverty Reduction: Evidence from Indonesia. SMERU Working Paper. Jakarta. Tambunan, Tulus T. H. 2009. Perekonomian Indonesia. Ghalia Indonesia, Jakarta. Tambunan, Tulus T. H. 2006. Perekonomian Indonesia Sejak Orde Lama Hingga Pasca Krisis . Pustaka Quantum, Jakarta. Timmer, C. Peter. 2004. The road to pro-poor growth: the Indonesian experience in regional perspective. Bulletin of Economic Studies;402:177-207. http:www.informaworld.comsmpptitle~content=t713406865 Todaro, M. P and S. C. Smith. 2006. Pembangunan Ekonomi. Jilid 1. Edisi 9. Alih Bahasa. Penerbit Erlangga. Jakarta. United Nation. 2009. UN Human Development Report 2009. United Nation. United Nation. United Nation Website. United Nation Millenium Declaration. http:www.un.orgmillenniumdeclarationares552e.htm Warr, Peter G. 2000. Is Growth Good for The Poor? Thailand’s Boom and Bust. International Journal of Social Economics ;27:862-877. World Bank. 2005. Era Baru dalam Pengentasan Kemiskinan di Indonesia ikhtisar. The World Bank Office Jakarta. Jakarta. World Bank. 2006. Making The New Indonesia Work for The Poor Working Paper. The World Bank Office Jakarta. Jakarta. White, Howard and Anderson, Edward. 2001. Growth versus Distribution: Does the Pattern of Growth Matter? Development Policy Review;193:267- 289. Oxford. Wicaksana, Sunarwan Arif. 2007. Analisis Kesenjangan Kemiskinan Antar Propinsi di Indonesia Periode Tahun 2000-2004. [Tesis]. Universitas Islam Indonesia. Yogyakarta. LAMPIRAN Lampiran 1. Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Menurut Provinsi di Indonesia Tahun 2005- 2009 persen No Provinsi 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 1 NAD -10.12 1.56 -2.36 -5.27 -5.58 2 Sumut 5.48 6.20 6.90 6.39 5.07 3 Sumbar 5.73 6.14 6.34 6.37 4.16 4 R i a u 5.41 5.15 3.41 5.65 2.90 5 J a m b i 5.57 5.89 6.82 7.16 6.38 6 Sumsel 4.84 5.20 5.84 5.10 4.07 7 Bengkulu 5.82 5.95 6.03 4.93 4.45 8 Lampung 4.02 4.98 5.94 5.26 5.07 9 Babel 3.47 3.98 4.54 4.44 3.58 10 Kepri 6.57 6.78 7.01 6.65 3.51 11 DKI Jakarta 6.01 5.95 6.44 6.18 5.05 12 Jabar 5.60 6.02 6.48 5.83 4.29 13 Jateng 5.35 5.33 5.59 5.46 4.71 14 DIY 4.73 3.70 4.31 5.02 -47.37 15 Jatim 5.87 5.77 6.11 5.90 5.06 16 Banten 5.88 5.57 6.04 5.82 4.65 17 B a l i 5.56 5.28 5.92 5.97 5.33 18 NTB 4.69 5.23 6.02 5.42 8.99 19 NTT 5.90 5.84 6.06 6.16 4.24 20 Kalbar 5.06 4.98 6.01 6.23 4.76 21 Kalteng 3.17 2.85 1.88 4.82 5.48 22 Kalsel 4.90 5.72 6.47 7.56 5.01 23 Kaltim 7.57 7.82 7.99 7.76 2.25 24 Sulut 6.05 6.72 6.34 7.78 7.85 25 Sulteng 7.31 7.68 7.96 7.27 7.65 26 Sulsel 7.19 7.30 7.51 7.76 6.20 27 Sultra 6.78 6.42 7.43 8.54 7.57 28 Gorontalo 1.71 2.77 4.91 2.63 7.54 29 Sulbar 3.46 5.08 5.15 4.81 6.03 30 Maluku 5.07 5.55 5.62 4.23 5.43 31 Malut 5.10 5.48 6.01 5.98 6.02 32 Pabar 6.80 4.55 6.95 7.33 6.26 33 Papua 36.40 -17.14 4.34 -1.49 21.21 Indonesia

5.38 5.18

5.67 5.59

4.56 Sumber: BPS Lampiran 2. Selisih Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Menurut Provinsi di Indonesia Tahun 2005-2009 persen No Provinsi 2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 1 NAD 11.68 -3.92 -2.91 -0.31 2 Sumut 0.72 0.70 -0.51 -1.32 3 Sumbar 0.41 0.20 0.02 -2.20 4 R i a u -0.26 -1.74 2.24 -2.75 5 J a m b i 0.32 0.93 0.34 -0.78 6 Sumsel 0.37 0.64 -0.74 -1.02 7 Bengkulu 0.13 0.08 -1.10 -0.47 8 Lampung 0.96 0.96 -0.68 -0.19 9 Babel 0.50 0.56 -0.10 -0.86 10 Kepri 0.21 0.23 -0.36 -3.13 11 DKI Jakarta -0.07 0.49 -0.26 -1.13 12 Jabar 0.42 0.46 -0.65 -1.54 13 Jateng -0.01 0.26 -0.14 -0.75 14 DIY -1.04 0.61 0.71 -52.39 15 Jatim -0.09 0.33 -0.21 -0.84 16 Banten -0.31 0.47 -0.22 -1.17 17 B a l i -0.28 0.64 0.06 -0.64 18 NTB 0.53 0.80 -0.61 3.58 19 NTT -0.06 0.23 0.10 -1.92 20 Kalbar -0.08 1.03 0.22 -1.47 21 Kalteng -0.32 -0.97 2.94 0.67 22 Kalsel 0.82 0.75 1.09 -2.55 23 Kaltim 0.26 0.17 -0.23 -5.51 24 Sulut 0.67 -0.37 1.44 0.06 25 Sulteng 0.37 0.28 -0.69 0.38 26 Sulsel 0.12 0.21 0.25 -1.55 27 Sultra -0.36 1.01 1.11 -0.97 28 Gorontalo 1.05 2.14 -2.27 4.91 29 Sulbar 1.62 0.07 -0.34 1.22 30 Maluku 0.48 0.07 -1.39 1.20 31 Malut 0.38 0.52 -0.02 0.03 32 Pabar -2.25 2.39 0.39 -1.07 33 Papua -53.54 21.48 -5.82 22.70 Indonesia -0.19

0.48 -0.07

-1.03 Lampiran 3. Nilai Indeks Gini Menurut Provinsi di Indonesia Tahun 2005-2009 No Provinsi 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 1 NAD 0.30 0.00 0.27 0.27 0.29 2 Sumut 0.33 0.30 0.31 0.31 0.32 3 Sumbar 0.30 0.33 0.31 0.29 0.30 4 R i a u 0.28 0.31 0.32 0.31 0.33 5 J a m b i 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.28 0.27 6 Sumsel 0.31 0.28 0.32 0.30 0.31 7 Bengkulu 0.35 0.29 0.34 0.33 0.30 8 Lampung 0.38 0.31 0.39 0.35 0.35 9 Babel 0.28 0.25 0.26 0.26 0.29 10 Kepri 0.27 0.33 0.30 0.30 0.29 11 DKI Jakarta 0.27 0.31 0.34 0.33 0.36 12 Jabar 0.34 0.35 0.34 0.35 0.36 13 Jateng 0.31 0.31 0.33 0.31 0.32 14 DIY 0.42 0.39 0.37 0.36 0.38 15 Jatim 0.36 0.30 0.34 0.33 0.33 16 Banten 0.36 0.33 0.37 0.34 0.37 17 B a l i 0.33 0.35 0.33 0.30 0.31 18 NTB 0.32 0.37 0.33 0.33 0.35 19 NTT 0.35 0.37 0.35 0.34 0.36 20 Kalbar 0.31 0.27 0.31 0.31 0.32 21 Kalteng 0.28 0.21 0.30 0.29 0.29 22 Kalsel 0.28 0.33 0.34 0.33 0.35 23 Kaltim 0.32 0.30 0.33 0.34 0.38 24 Sulut 0.32 0.36 0.32 0.28 0.31 25 Sulteng 0.30 0.37 0.32 0.33 0.34 26 Sulsel 0.35 0.36 0.37 0.36 0.39 27 Sultra 0.36 0.26 0.35 0.33 0.36 28 Gorontalo 0.36 0.38 0.39 0.34 0.35 29 Sulbar 0.00 0.00 0.31 0.31 0.30 30 Maluku 0.26 0.34 0.33 0.31 0.31 31 Malut 0.26 0.38 0.33 0.33 0.33 32 Pabar 0.00 0.00 0.30 0.40 0.38 33 Papua 0.39 0.33 0.41 0.31 0.35 Indonesia 0.36 0.33 0.36 0.35 0.37 Sumber: BPS