Conclusion Suggestion CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION
skills. Students’ proficiency in English is not solely teacher’s responsibility; it also depends on
students’ active role in learning English. Finally, this research can also become a contribution to the research in
education which is intended to find out the effectiveness of certain technique, in this case the Teams Games Tournaments technique. This research may also be a
relevant previous study that can be used by other researchers to conduct a further research relating to the implementation of Teams Games Tournaments technique.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Anderson, Mark and Kathy Anderson. Text Types in English 1. South Yarra: Macmillan, 1997.
-------. Text Types in English 2. South Yarra: Macmillan, 1997. -------. Text Types in English 3. South Yarra: Macmillan, 1998.
Arends, I Richard. Learning to Teach 7
th
Edition. New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2007.
Clouse, Barbara Fine. Patterns for a Purpose a Rhetorical Reader 3
th
Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2003.
Cruickshank, Donald R. et.al., The Act of Teaching. New York: McGraw-Hills, 2006.
Dietsch, Betty Mattix. Reason and Writing Well a Rhetoric Research Guide Reader And Handbook 4
th
Edition. Boston: McGrew-Hill Companies, 2006. Farkhan, M. The Class of Language Testing, 2002
Heaton, J.B. Writing English Language Tests. New York: Longman Inc., 1990. Jolliffe, Wendy. Cooperative Learning in the Classroom. London: Paul Chapman
Publishing. 2007. Kauchak, P Donald and Paul D Eggen. Learning and Teaching: Research-Based
Methods. Boston: A Division of Simon and Schuster Inc, 1993. Kessler, Carolyn. Cooperative Language Lear
ning, A Teachers’ Resource Book. London: Prentice-Hall, 1992.
Killen, Roy. Effective Teaching Strategies 4
th
Edition. South Melbourne: Cengage Learning. 2007.
McMahan, Elizabeth and Susan Day. The Writers’ Rhetoric and Handbook. New
York: McGrew-Hill Book Company, 1984. Orlich, C Donald. Teaching Strategies A Guide to Effective Instruction 9
th
Edition. Boston: Wadsworth Cengage Learning, 2010.
Pharr, Donald and Santi V Buscemi. Writing Today, Contexts and Options for the Real World, New York: McGraw-Hill Companies, 2005.
Prihatin, Erni dkk. Pendalaman Materi Sukses Ujian Nasional Bahasa Inggris. Jakarta: AKASIA, 2012.
Ruetten, Mark K. and Cheryl Pavlik, Developing Composition Skills Academic Writing and Grammar, Boston: Heinle Cengage Learning, 2012.
Saddish, William R. et.al., Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference. New York: Houghton Mifflin Company,
2003. Siahaan, Sanggam and Kisno Shinoda, Generic Text Structure. Yogyakarta; Graha
Ilmu, 2008. Siahaan, Sanggam. The English Paragraph. Yogyakarta; Graha Ilmu, 2008.
Slavin, Robert E. Cooperative Learning, Theory, Research, and Practice Second
Edition. London: Ally and Bacon, 1995. Susetyo, Budi. Statistik Untuk Analisis Data Penelitian. Bandung: PT Refika
Aditama, 2010.
VALIDITY TEST OF MTSN 3 JAKARTA NO
Group Key
Option ID
DP Remark
A B
C D
ID DP
1 UG
C
10 0.75
0.50 ME
E LG
4 5
1 2
UP A
10 0.90
0.20 ME
M LG
8 1
1 3
UP B
1 8
1 0.60
0.40 MeDi
E LG
3 4
1 2
4
UP B
10 0.65
0.70 MeDI
E LG
1 3
3 3
5
UP B
8 2
0.60 0.40
MeDi E
LG 1
4 2
3 6
UP D
1 9
0.65 0.50
MeDi E
LG
4 1
1 4
7
UP C
10 0.70
0.60 ME
E LG
2 2
4 2
8
UP A
8 2
0.55 0.50
MeDi E
LG 3
4 1
2 9
UP B
10 0.75
0.50 ME
E LG
2 5
3 10
UP C
1 2
7 0.50
0.40 ME
E LG
2 2
3 3
11
UP A
9 1
0.65 0.50
MeDi E
LG 4
4 2
12
UP C
10 0.70
0.60 MeDi
E LG
3 3
4 13
UP B
10 0.80
0.40 VE
E LG
6 4
14
UP B
9 1
0.65 0.50
MeDi E
LG 2
4 1
3 15
UP A
10 0.80
0.40 ME
E LG
6 3
1 16
UP B
10 0.80
0.40 ME
E LG
3 6
1 17
UP B
1 9
0.65 0.50
MeDi E
LG 3
4 3
18
UP C
10 0.68
0.45 MeDi
E LG
2 3
5 19
UP B
1 8
1 0.60
0.40 MeDi
E
LG 4
4 2
20
UP C
3 7
0.55 0.30
MeDi G
LG 1
2 4
21
UP D
1 9
0.70 0.40
ME E
LG 5
5 22
UP B
10 0.64
0.55 MeDi
E LG
4 4
2 23
UP C
10 0.75
0.50 ME
E LG
1 1
5 3
24
UP B
10 0.70
0.60 MeDi
E LG
4 4
2 25
UP A
7 1
1 1
0.55 0.30
MeDi G
LG 4
2 4
26
UP B
10 0.68
0.45 MeDi
E LG
2 5
2 1
27
UP B
8 2
0.55 0.36
MeDi G
LG 2
4 4
28
UP D
10 0.85
0.30 VE
G LG
3 7
29
UP A
7 2
1 0.50
0.40 MoDi
E LG
3 4
3 30
UP B
10 0.77
0.27 ME
M LG
1 7
2
LESSON PLANNING Unit Study
: SMP Subject
: English ClassSemester
: VIIIII Material
: Narrative text, in simple fable form Skill
: Reading Time
: 4 x 2 JP A. Goal of Learning
Students have a good competence in explaining and asking the oral and written text of narrative text using the text structure with right language
elements and appropriated with the context, honestly, discipline, confident, responsible, care, cooperate, and piece.