1. Home
  2. Lainnya

Tabel Hasil Uji Validitas dan Reliabilitas

12. Rekapitulasi Frekuensi Jawaban Variabel Penggunaan e-Filing No Varibel Penggunaan e-Filing Frekuensi Jawaban Total 5 4 3 2 1 1 Penggunaan e-Filing setiap kali melaporkan pajak 2 48 7 57 2 Kehendak menggunakan e-Filing di masa depan 16 28 9 1 3 57 3 Menggunakan e-Filing karena memiliki fitur yang membantu pekerjaan 4 35 3 12 3 57 Jumlah 22 111 12 20 6 171

C. Tabel Hasil Uji Validitas dan Reliabilitas

1. Hasil Uji Validitas Variabel Persepsi Kebermanfaatan X1 Correlations X11 X12 X13 Total X11 Pearson Correlation 1 .617 .313 .786 Sig. 2-tailed .000 .018 .000 N 57 57 57 57 X12 Pearson Correlation .617 1 .540 .861 Sig. 2-tailed .000 .000 .000 N 57 57 57 57 X13 Pearson Correlation .313 .540 1 .787 Sig. 2-tailed .018 .000 .000 N 57 57 57 57 Total Pearson Correlation .786 .861 .787 1 Sig. 2-tailed .000 .000 .000 N 57 57 57 57 . Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level 2-tailed. . Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level 2-tailed. 2. Hasil Uji Validitas Variabel Persepsi Kemudahan X2 Correlations X21 X22 X23 X24 X25 Total X21 Pearson Correlation 1 .798 .719 .434 .148 .739 Sig. 2-tailed .000 .000 .001 .271 .000 N 57 57 57 57 57 57 X22 Pearson Correlation .798 1 .788 .731 .509 .914 Sig. 2-tailed .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 N 57 57 57 57 57 57 X23 Pearson Correlation .719 .788 1 .762 .471 .895 Sig. 2-tailed .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 N 57 57 57 57 57 57 X24 Pearson Correlation .434 .731 .762 1 .814 .901 Sig. 2-tailed .001 .000 .000 .000 .000 N 57 57 57 57 57 57 X25 Pearson Correlation .148 .509 .471 .814 1 .716 Sig. 2-tailed .271 .000 .000 .000 .000 N 57 57 57 57 57 57 Total Pearson Correlation .739 .914 .895 .901 .716 1 Sig. 2-tailed .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 N 57 57 57 57 57 57 . Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level 2-tailed. 3. Hasil Uji Validitas Variabel Kepuasan X3 Correlations X31 X32 X33 X34 Total X31 Pearson Correlation 1 .480 .429 .317 .696 Sig. 2-tailed .000 .001 .016 .000 N 57 57 57 57 57 X32 Pearson Correlation .480 1 .786 .555 .843 Sig. 2-tailed .000 .000 .000 .000 N 57 57 57 57 57 X33 Pearson Correlation .429 .786 1 .781 .907 Sig. 2-tailed .001 .000 .000 .000 N 57 57 57 57 57 X34 Pearson Correlation .317 .555 .781 1 .822 Sig. 2-tailed .016 .000 .000 .000 N 57 57 57 57 57 Total Pearson Correlation .696 .843 .907 .822 1 Sig. 2-tailed .000 .000 .000 .000 N 57 57 57 57 57 . Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level 2-tailed. . Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level 2-tailed. 4. Hasil Uji Validitas Variabel Persepsi Kerumitan X4 Correlations X41 X42 Total X41 Pearson Correlation 1 .696 .899 Sig. 2-tailed .000 .000 N 57 57 57 X42 Pearson Correlation .696 1 .940 Sig. 2-tailed .000 .000 N 57 57 57 Total Pearson Correlation .899 .940 1 Sig. 2-tailed .000 .000 N 57 57 57 . Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level 2-tailed. 5. Hasil Uji Validitas Variabel Persepsi Resiko X5 Correlations X51 X52 X53 Total X51 Pearson Correlation 1 .672 .633 .871 Sig. 2-tailed .000 .000 .000 N 57 57 57 57 X52 Pearson Correlation .672 1 .714 .898 Sig. 2-tailed .000 .000 .000 N 57 57 57 57 X53 Pearson Correlation .633 .714 1 .882 Sig. 2-tailed .000 .000 .000 N 57 57 57 57 Total Pearson Correlation .871 .898 .882 1 Sig. 2-tailed .000 .000 .000 N 57 57 57 57 . Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level 2-tailed. 6. Hasil Uji Validitas Variabel Penggunaan e-Filing Correlations Y1 Y2 Y3 Total Y1 Pearson Correlation 1 .541 .507 .749 Sig. 2-tailed .000 .000 .000 N 57 57 57 57 Y2 Pearson Correlation .541 1 .666 .888 Sig. 2-tailed .000 .000 .000 N 57 57 57 57 Y3 Pearson Correlation .507 .666 1 .884 Sig. 2-tailed .000 .000 .000 N 57 57 57 57 Total Pearson Correlation .749 .888 .884 1 Sig. 2-tailed .000 .000 .000 N 57 57 57 57 . Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level 2-tailed. 7. Hasil Uji Reliabilitas Variabel Persepsi Kebermanfaatan Case Processing Summary N Cases Valid 57 100.0 Excluded a .0 Total 57 100.0 a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure. 8. Hasil Uji Reliabilitas Variabel Persepsi Kemudahan Case Processing Summary N Cases Valid 57 100.0 Excluded a .0 Total 57 100.0 a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure. Reliability Statistics Cronbachs Alpha N of Items .721 3 Item Statistics Mean Std. Deviation N X11 4.00 .824 57 X12 4.02 .668 57 X13 3.79 .901 57 Reliability Statistics Cronbachs Alpha N of Items .884 5 Item Statistics Mean Std. Deviation N X21 3.00 1.323 57 X22 3.12 1.151 57 X23 3.28 1.221 57 X24 3.19 1.246 57 X25 3.32 1.365 57 9. Hasil Uji Reliabilitas Variabel Persepsi Kepuasan Case Processing Summary N Cases Valid 57 100.0 Excluded a .0 Total 57 100.0 a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure. 10. Hasil Uji Reliabilitas Variabel Persepsi Kerumitan Case Processing Summary N Cases Valid 57 100.0 Excluded a .0 Total 57 100.0 a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure. Reliability Statistics Cronbachs Alpha N of Items .821 4 Item Statistics Mean Std. Deviation N X31 3.40 1.116 57 X32 3.72 .881 57 X33 3.60 .942 57 X34 3.40 1.147 57 Reliability Statistics Cronbachs Alpha N of Items .806 2 Item Statistics Mean Std. Deviation N X41 2.82 1.037 57 X42 2.67 1.327 57 11. Hasil Uji Reliabilitas Variabel Persepsi Risiko Case Processing Summary N Cases Valid 57 100.0 Excluded a .0 Total 57 100.0 a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure. 12. Hasil Uji Reliabilitas Variabel Penggunaan e-Filing Case Processing Summary N Cases Valid 57 100.0 Excluded a .0 Total 57 100.0 a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure. Reliability Statistics Cronbachs Alpha N of Items .860 3 Item Statistics Mean Std. Deviation N X51 2.54 1.240 57 X52 2.28 1.206 57 X53 2.40 1.193 57 Reliability Statistics Cronbachs Alpha N of Items .791 3 Item Statistics Mean Std. Deviation N Y1 3.79 .700 57 Y2 3.93 .997 57 Y3 3.44 1.069 57

D. Hasil Perhitungan Koefisien Korelasi Spearman

Dokumen yang terkait

Hubungan persepsi pelayanan, persepsi konsultasi, dan persepsi pengawasan Account Representative (AR) dengan persepsi kepatuhan wajib pajak orang pribadi (studi kasus di Kantor Pelayanan Pajak (KPP) Pratama Temanggung).

10 41 135

Hubungan persepsi Self Assessment System, persepsi sosialisasi perpajakan, persepsi tingkat pendidikan dengan persepsi kepatuhan wajib pajak orang pribadi (studi kasus di Kantor Pelayanan Pajak Pratama Surakarta).

0 0 133

Analisis hubungan persepsi pengetahuan pajak, persepsi kualitas pelayanan, persepsi konsultasi Account Representative (AR) dengan persepsi kepatuhan wajib pajak orang pribadi : studi kasus di Kantor Pelayanan Pajak Pratama Sleman, Yogyakarta.

10 69 135

Hubungan persepsi pengetahuan wajib pajak, persepsi kemudahan pengisian SPT, persepsi kesadaran wajib pajak, persepsi kegunaan e-filing dengan persepsi kepatuhan penyampaian SPT tahunan wajib pajak orang pribadi : studi kasus di Kantor Pelayanan Pajak Pra

0 5 168

Analisis hubungan persepsi pengetahuan tax amnesty, persepsi kualitas pelayanan account representative, persepsi kesadaran wajib pajak dengan persepsi kepatuhan wajib pajak orang pribadi

0 9 145

Hubungan persepsi kebermanfaatan, persepsi kemudahan, dan persepsi kepuasan penerapan E Filing dengan persepsi kepatuhan wajib pajak orang pribadi (studi kasus pada Kepolisian Resor Klaten)

3 41 180

Analisis persepsi kebermanfaatan, persepsi kemudahan, persepsi kepuasan wajib pajak orang pribadi dengan penggunaan e billing sebagai sarana pembayaran pajak secara elektronik

13 48 139

PENGARUH PERSEPSI KEBERMANFAATAN, PERSEPSI KEMUDAHAN,PERSEPSI KERUMITAN, DAN PERSEPSI KEPUASAN WAJIB PAJAKTERHADAP PENGGUNAAN E-FILLING BAGI WAJIB PAJAK ORANG PRIBADI DI KOTA KUDUS

0 0 16

PENGARUH PERSEPSI KEMANFAATAN, PERSEPSI KEMUDAHAN, KEAMANAN DAN KERAHASIAAN, SERTA KEPUASAN WAJIB PAJAK ORANG PRIBADI TERHADAP PERILAKU PENGGUNAAN E-FILING

0 3 16

PENGARUH PERSEPSI KEBERMANFAATAN, PERSEPSI KERUMITAN, DAN PERSEPSI KEPUASAN WAJIB PAJAK TERHADAP PENGGUNAAN E-FILING BAGI WAJIB PAJAK ORANG PRIBADI DI KOTA KUDUS - Eprints UPN "Veteran" Yogyakarta

0 1 14