Procedure of the Research

CHAPTER IV RESEARCH FINDINGS

A. Data Description

1. The Data of Experiment Class Based on the statistical calculation, the mean score of pre-test is 53.71 with the maximum score was 76 and minimum score was 36 see appendix 1. It can be classified by using Sturgess formula, the interval class is 6 and the length of interval class is 7. It showed that there are 4 students got score between 71 to 77, 4 students got score between 64 to 70, 7 students got score between 57 to 63, 6 students got score between 50 to 56, 7 students got score between 43 to 49, and 7 students got score between 36 to 42 see appendix 3. Furthermore, the mean score of post-test is 71.89, with the maximum score is 88 and minimum score is 52 see appendix 1. The interval class is 6 and the length of interval class is 6, too. It showed that there are 4 students got score between 85 to 91, 7 students got score between 78 to 84, 8 students got score between 72 to 77, 6 students got score between 65 to 71, 7 students got score between 58 to 64, and 3 students got score between 52 to 57 see appendix 3. Meanwhile, the calculation showed that the mean of gained score of pre- test and post-test in experiment class is 18.34, with the maximum score is 28 and minimum score is 4. 2. The Data of Control Class The result showed that the mean score of pre-test was 55.09 with the maximum score was 76 and minimum score was 20 see appendix 2. The length of interval class of the data is 10. It can be drawn that 4 students got score between 70 to 79, 9 students got score between 60 to 69, 11 students got score 35 between 50 to 59, 8 students got score between 40 to 49, 2 students got score between 30 to 39, and only 1 student got score between 20 to 29 see appendix 3. Otherwise, the mean score of post-test was 69.66 with the maximum score was 84 and minimum score was 44 see appendix 2. The length of interval class is 7. The score can be grouped as 9 students got score between 79 to 85, 8 students got score between 72 to 78, 2 students got score between 65 to 71, 9 students got score between 58 to 64, 5 students got score between 51 to 57, and the last 2 students got score between 44 to 50 see appendix 3. Meanwhile, the mean of gained score of pre-test and post-test from control class is 13.6, with the maximum score is 24 and minimum score is 4.

B. The Analysis of The Data and Hypotheses Testing 1. Item Test Analysis

Before giving pre-test to the sample of research, the writer did the item test validity first. The test divided into two times. First, test validity of instrument I for pre-test items and test validity of instrument II for post-test items. The test validity of instrument I shown that there are 15 items is significant and 15 items is low of significant with the test reliability is 0.77 high. Meanwhile, the test validity of instrument II shown that there are 13 items is significant and 17 items is low of significant with the test reliability is 0.52 medium. Then, the writer modified the quality of distractor of the items that low of significant to be the instrument pre- test and post-test.

2. Analysis of Pre-Test and Post-Test

In calculating the normality and homogeneity of pre-test and post-test, the writer use One-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test and Lillifors test.

a. Normality

Before calculating the t-test value to find out the hypothesis of the research, a test of normality and homogeneity are needed to know whether the data has been normality distributed or not; the data are homogeneous or heterogeneous. The writer used SPSS Statistic 18 to count the normality of each test. The test would be normal distribution if the result of calculation from SPSS Statistic 18, the number showed less than the result in Kolmogorov-Smirnov table with the number of sample n is 35. These tests are valued using SPSS Statistic 18. The normality Using One- Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test results can be seen as bellow: Table 4.1 Normality of Pre-test Using One-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test One-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test KWL Plus Jigsaw N 35 35 Normal Parameters a,b Mean 53.7143 55.0857 Std. Deviation 11.53147 12.12040 Most Extreme Differences Absolute .136 .130 Positive .090 .099 Negative -.136 -.130 Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z .803 .769 Asymp. Sig. 2-tailed .539 .595 a. Test distribution is Normal. b. Calculated from data. The normality calculation above used One-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test. From the table above, it is shown that the absolute difference D of KWL Plus Experiment Class data is 0.136. It is much less that absolute difference in Kolmogorov-Smirnov table with the closest Kolmogorov-Smirnov critical points of 35 = 0.224. It means that the pre-test of experiment class data is normal. Meanwhile, the absolute difference of Jigsaw Controlled Class data is 0.130. I is also much less than D-table with the closest Kolmogorov-Smirnov critical points

Dokumen yang terkait

The Errors Of Unity And Coherence In Writing English Paragraph Made By The Sixth Semester Students Of D-3 English Study Program Of Usu : A Case Study

4 43 68

The Effect of Using KWL (Know-Want to Know- Learned) Strategy on the Eleventh Grade Students' Reading Comprehension Achievement at SMAN 1 Besuki in the 2014/2015 Academic Year”.

0 39 3

The Effectiveness of Computer-Assisted Language Learning in Teaching Past Tense to the Tenth Grade Students of SMAN 5 Tangerang Selatan

4 116 138

THE READABILITY OF READING TEXTS IN ENGLISH TEXTBOOKS FOR THE EIGHTH GRADE STUDENTS IN MEDAN IN THE ACADEMIC YEAR OF 2015/2016.

0 3 23

THE FUNCTION OF FIRST LANGUAGE IN TEACHING ENGLISH TO THE ELEVENTH GRADE OF SOCIAL STUDENTS AT SMAN 1 The Function Of First Language In Teaching English To The Eleventh Grade Of Social Students At Sman 1 Banyudono In 2015/2016 Academic Year.

0 4 12

THE FUNCTION OF FIRST LANGUAGE IN TEACHING ENGLISH The Function Of First Language In Teaching English To The Eleventh Grade Of Social Students At Sman 1 Banyudono In 2015/2016 Academic Year.

0 4 14

INTRODUCTION The Function Of First Language In Teaching English To The Eleventh Grade Of Social Students At Sman 1 Banyudono In 2015/2016 Academic Year.

0 3 5

View of THE EFFECTIVENESS OF KNOW-WHAT-LEARN (KWL) AND JIGSAW TECHNIQUES IN TEACHING READING FOR COMPREHENDING NARRATIVE TEXT

0 0 8

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF USING KWL (KNOW, WANT TO LEARN, LEARNED) TECHNIQUE ON SPOOF TEXT TO INCREASE STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION ( Classroom Action Research of the Tenth Grade Students’ of MAN 1 Kota Magelang in the Academic Year of 2014/2015) - Test Rep

0 0 114

THE USE OF KWL (KNOW-WANT-LEARN) AND METACOGNITIVE STRATEGIES TO IMPROVE THE STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION ( A Classroom Action Research of the Second Grade Students of MTs N Ngablak in the Academic Year of 2017/2018) - Test Repository

0 0 150