Reflection Report of Cycle 1

The bell rang. The researcher asked the students to collect their writing. The researcher closed that day lesson by prayer. As usual they sang a national song before going home.

c. Reflection

After the end of the Cycle 1, the researcher and the collaborator conducted a discussion to make reflection of teaching and learning process of writing with graphic organizers. This discussion also fulfilled the democratic and dialogic validity of this research. In the discussion, they analysed the data from observation of the implemented action. They also analysed the data from the interviewed with students and collaborator regarding the teaching and learning process using graphic organizers. The result of the students’ writing also included in the discussion. Then, they made decision regarding the action of the implementation of graphic organizers in the teaching and learning process. They discussed whether the action was successful or not to improve the students’ writing skills. They then decided what action should be keep and what should be modified to solve the problems in students’ writing the students liked to use graphic organizers in their writing. The students interest toward English were also improve. They enjoyed learning recount text using graphic organizers because it has many colours and pictures. The interviews with the students showed that they were enjoy using graphic organizers. Related to recount text, they students said that the graphic organizers helped them to understand the generic structure of recount text better. The following scripts was the students’ views regarding of graphic organizers. T : Bagaimana kesan kalian dengan pembelajaran menggunakan graphic organizers? How about your impression of the learning process using graphic organizers? S : Menyenangkan Miss. Soalnya graphic organizers membantu kita buat lebih paham tentang recount text. I was happy Miss. Graphic organizers helped me to understand recount text better. T : Lebih paham dengan hal apa ya? In what aspect? S : Tentang generic structure recount text Miss. Soalnya kan di graphic organizers dipisah-pisah gitu point nya jadi bisa lebih paham tentang recount text. The generic structure of recount text Miss. In graphic organizers, the generic structure of recount text was divided into some parts so it made us understand the recount text better. T : Kalau untuk menulis sendiri, apakah graphic organizers membantu kalian dalam menulis? In writing, were graphic organizers help you in writing? S2 : Iya membantu Miss. Karena dalam graphic organizers sudah ada poin-poin nya jadi kita tinggal mikir ngisinya dan menulisnya dengan kalimat-kalimat sendiri. Yes, it was. Because there were some points in graphic organizers, so we just think to fill the points and write it with our own sentences. Interview Transcript 49-4-16 The improvement of students’ writing skills were presented in the table below. Table 5: The Result of the Changes of the Students’ Writing Ability in Pre- Action and Cycle 1 The students’ writing skills Pre-Test Cycle 1 C ontent  The students had difficulty in generating ideas.  They did not know what should they wrote.  They collected their writing unfinished.  The students copied the model texts or their friend’s writing.  The students could generate their own ideas.  They wrote their ideas in the graphic organizers.  The could write the text with the complete generic structure.  The students begin to write their own ideas. Or ga niza ti on  They did not understand the generic structure of recount texts.  They understood the generic structure of recount text and wrote the text according those generic structure. La ngua ge us e  They could not memorize the formula of the grammar.  They used simple present times in a recount text.  They used double verbs in their sentences.  Their sentences were direct translations from Indonesia to English  They understood that they had to use past tense in the recount text.  They started to use past verbs in their sentence  Some of them still forget to use past verbs in their sentences. Voc abular y  They had low vocabulary mastery.  They were lazy to open dictionary to find the new words they did know yet.  They chose the wrong words choice.  Their vocabulary started to increase.  The teacher guide them to always use the dictionary when faced the words they did not know.  Some of them still chose the wrong words choice. Mec ha nics  The students forgot to use the correct punctuation in the sentences.  They had problems in spelling.  They had problems in capital letter.  The students started to put the correct punctuation in the sentences.  They started to pay attention in writing the correct spelling of words.  They started to pay attention to capital letter. Overall, the use of graphic organizers in the teaching and learning process improved the students’ writing skills, especially in content and organization. Moreover, the other aspect of writing such as language use, vocabulary, and mechanics were also improve. The improvements of students’ writing showed in the two tables below Writing Aspect Content Organization Language Use Vocabulary Mechanics Total Total Score 349 304 283 302 75 1313 Mean Score 14.54 12.67 11.79 12.58 3.13 54.7 Table 6 : Students’ writing in Pre-Test Writing Aspect Content Organization Language Use Vocabulary Mechanics Total Total Score 532 405 326 359 102 1724 Mean Score 22.17 16.88 13.58 14.96 4.25 71.83 Table 7 : Students’ writing in Cycle 1 From the two tables abov e, the students’ mean score in Cycle 1 improved from 54.71 to 71.83. The five aspects of writing, namely content, organization, language use, vocabulary, and mechanics were also improve. The mean score of content improved from 14.54 to 22.17. The organization aspect improved from 12.67 to 16.88. The language use improve from 11.79 to 13.58. The vocabulary improved from 12.58 to 14. 96. The mechanics improved from 3.13 to 4.25. The mean score of Cycle 1 was 71.83, yet it was still below the KKM which was 75. Overall, the implementation of the graphic organizers in Cycle 1 was successful enough but it still below the KKM, therefore the researcher, the collaborator, and the English teacher decided to conduct Cycle 2 in order to reach the KKM of the students.

2. Report of Cycle 2