The Designed Materials RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS

to activate students’ prior knowledge of the learning material. The second part is Be Ready to Roll which is the preparatory tasks before going to the main activity. The third part is Walk Ahead, which contains of the main activities to practice the expressions and skills introduced in the earlier part. The last part is Watch My Progress, which provides the reflection area of the whole activities for students. Before presenting the final version, the designed material was evaluated by distributing questionnaire to two English teachers of SMA Santa Maria Yogyakarta and two ELSEP lecturers of Sanata Dharma University. The results of the questionnaire were analyzed using central tendency. The result shown the means ranged between 4-5. It indicated that the designed material were well- designed and acceptable. The outcomes signified that the designed materials were ready to be applied in language major grade XI of SMA Santa Maria Yogyakarta. However, there were some revisions conducted to make the designed materials better. The revisions were done based on the feedback and suggestions from field testing respondents.

B. Suggestions

In this part, the writer would like to give the material users and the future researchers some suggestions related to the study in this field. In order to use the material effectively, the users are suggested to read the teachers’ manual, task instruction and the sample of the lesson plan. In implementing MI theory in the classroom, the teachers should be aware of students’ characters, needs and interests. The teachers are advised to recognize students’ intelligences initially. Also, the teachers should recognize the way the students learn differently. At first, it is difficult to raise students’ motivation but it is teachers’ job to encourage students to learn by providing various activities based on their intelligences to learn English best as it develops students in intelligences as well. At the end of each meeting, the students are given time to reflect their experiences during learning activities. As the feedback, the users are invited to give comment and suggestions optimally to encourage students’ motivation. It is not suggested to give judgments which discourage students. Instead, the teachers are recommended to give a lot of encouragement. Due to the time limitation, the designed materials have not been implemented yet. For the future researchers, studies and the implementation of the designed material to better improvement in quality and effectiveness are welcomed. The material can always be revised and improved to be more applicable and appropriate. 67 REFERENCES Ary, D., L. C. Jacobs, and A. Razavieh. 2002. Introduction to research in education. Belmont: Wadsworth Group. Borg, W. E., and M. E. Gall. 1986. Educational research: An introduction. New York: Longman Inc. Brown, J. D., Rodgers, T. S. 2002. Doing second language research. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Campbell, L., Campbell, B., Dickinson, D. 1996. Teaching Learning Through Multiple Intelligence. Massachusetts: Allyn Bacon. Canfield, J., and Harold, C., W., 1994. 100 Ways to Enhance Self-Concept in the Classroom A Handbook for Teachers, Counselors Group Leaders. Boston: Allyn Bacon. Cohen, L., Marison, L., Morrison, K., 2000. Research Methods in Education. London: Routledge Falmer. Christinson, M. 1998. Applying Multiple Intelligences in the Second and Foreign Language majorroom. Burlingame, CA: Alta Book Center Publishers. Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. 2003. Undang-Undang no. 20 tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. Jakarta. Gardner, H. 1983. Frames of Mind: The theory of multiple intelligence. New York: Basic Book. Gardner, H. 1999. Intelligence Reframed: The Intelligences for 21 st Century. New York: Basic Book. Kemp, J. E. 1977. Instructional Design: A Plan for Unit and Course Development. Belmont: Fearon-Pitman Publishers Inc. Kornhaber, M., Fierros, E., Veenema, S. A., 2004. Multiple Intelligences: Best Ideas From Research Practice. Boston: Pearson Education. Larsen- Freeman, D., 2000. Techniques Principles in Language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Molinsky, J., S. and Bill, B., Side By Side. Englewood Cliffs, N.J. 07632: Prentice Hall Regents. Mulyasa. 2007. Implementasi Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan, Kemandirian Guru dan Kepala Sekolah. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara. 68

Dokumen yang terkait

Designing a set of English speaking instructional materials based on multiple intelligence theory for level 1 of English mastery class of titian foundation.

0 0 190

Designing a set of English instructional writing materials using taks-based language learning for the tenth grade students of SMA Santa Maria Yogyakarta.

0 0 131

A set of instructional speaking materials based on multiple intelligence theory for the fourth grade students of SD Pius Kutoarjo.

0 0 170

A set of integrated instructional materials using stories for SMA Negeri 11 Yogyakarta grade eleven.

0 0 235

English vocabulary instructional materials based on the multiple intelligence theory for the seventh grade students of SMP Kanisius Pakem Sleman.

0 0 211

Speaking materials based on the multiple intelligence theory for the tenth grade students of SMA BOPKRI I Yogyakarta...

0 0 183

Designing a set of supplementary integrated english instructional materials based on multiple intelligences theory for the tenth grade students of SMA Negeri 11 Yogyakarta.

0 0 165

DESIGNING A SET OF SUPPLEMENTARY INTEGRATED ENGLISH INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS BASED ON MULTIPLE INTELLIGENCES THEORY FOR THE TENTH GRADE STUDENTS OF SMA NEGERI 11 YOGYAKARTA

0 1 161

English vocabulary instructional materials based on the multiple intelligence theory for the seventh grade students of SMP Kanisius Pakem Sleman - USD Repository

0 0 209

INTEGRATED ENGLISH INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS BASED ON MULTIPLE INTELLIGENCE THEORY FOR LANGUAGE MAJOR GRADE ELEVEN OF SMA SANTA MARIA YOGYAKARTA A THESIS Presented as Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements to Obtain the Sarjana Pendidikan Degree in English

0 0 251