Observing The Use of Cue Cards in Cycle Two
                                                                                81 the  students  who  were  present  in  the  class.  There  were  31  students  who  were
present in  the second meeting of cycle two.  The following  table  is  the results of questionnaire in cycle two.
Table 4.5 The Result of the Questionnaire in Cycle Two
No Statements
Strongly Disagree
Disagree Agree
Strongly Agree
1 Cue cards improve my English
speaking ability.
0.00 1
3.26 22
70.97 8
25.80
2 Cue cards give me the idea of
what I am going to say.
0.00 0.00
19 61.30
12 38.71
3 I can speak more fluently after
learning English using cue cards.
0.00 1
3.26 18
58.06 12
38.71
4 I can speak more confidently
after learning English using cue cards
0.00 0.00
20 64.52
11 35.49
5 I can speak spontaneously after
learning English using cue cards.
0.00 2
6.45 20
64.52 9
29.03
6 I can speak naturally after
learning English using cue cards
0.00 0.00
24 77.42
7 22.58
7 I am happy to study English
speaking using cue cards.
0.00 0.00
15 48.39
16 51.61
8 Cue cards in teaching and
learning English is attractive.
0.00 0.00
17 54.80
14 45.16
9 Cue cards motivate me to
participate more actively in the teaching-learning activities.
0.00 0.00
21 67.74
10 32.26
10 Cue cards in teaching and
learning English is very useful.
0.00 0.00
16 51.62
15 48.38
Total X
15 202
94
Total X Point
30 606
376
Total Points
1012
Mean
32.65
In Table 4.5 , the researcher could see the students’ perception about the use
of  cue  cards  to  improve  their  speaking  skill.  As  described  in  Chapter  Three,  the researcher  calculated  its  mean  score  to  conclude  the  data  gathered  from  the
questionnaire. The perception is positive if the mean score is higher than 25. If the
82 mean  score  equals  or  is  less  than  25,  it  means  that  the  students  have  a  negative
perception. In Table 4.5, the mean score was 35.16. It could be concluded that the students’ perception about the use of cue cards was positive.
The  same  as  the  previous  cycle,  the  use  of  cue  cards  was  running  in accordance  with  the  lesson  plan.  The  evidence  was  provided  through  field  notes
and  observation  checklist  filled  in  by  the  observer.  Through  the  observation checklist  and  field  notes,  the  data  presented  that  the  students  showed  positive
attitude to the implementation of cue cards. They were enthusiastic in playing the card game and performing the dialogue. They also could cooperate well with the
other students. Although the results of the speaking performance were getting better and the
students ’ perception about the use of cue cards was positive, the researcher needed
to conduct the third cycle. The third cycle was still needed since only 54  of the students  in  X  Kimia  Industri  of  SMK  Negeri  2  Depok  got  scores  more  than  the
minimum score, 75. On the other hand, there were two problems still found in the second cycle. The first problem was the time allocation to play the card game and
perform  the  dialogue  was  too  short.  The  second  problem  was the  students’
pronunciation was still weak. In the next cycle, the researcher would use another techn
ique  in  using  cue  cards  to  confirm  that  the  students’  speaking  skill  had improved.