Speaking Test The Research Instruments Used before the Implementation

45 In conducting the interview, the researcher prepared a list of questions as the interview guide. Semi-structured focus group interviews were conducted in the end of every cycle. The participants of the semi-structured interview were chosen randomly. There were two focus group interviews in every cycle in which there were 5-6 students in each group.

e. Speaking Test

Speaking test was conducted to measure the students’ speaking ability after the implementation of cue cards. The speaking test was conducted at the end of every cycle of this research. To conduct the speaking test, the students were given the communication cards. The students performed a conversation using the cues provided on the cue cards. While the students were performing in front of the class, the researcher conducted the assessment. According to Brown 2004, p. 157 three are some aspects that could be assessed in speaking skills. Those aspects were grammar, vocabulary, comprehension, fluency, pronunciation and task. Based on the 2013 Curriculum, there were two aspects which should be measured in the speaking tests. They were cognitive aspect and affective aspect. In this research, the cognitive aspect consisted of the understanding of the task, pronunciation, grammar, and fluency. Meanwhile, the affective aspect consisted of politeness and enthusiasm. To measure those aspects, the researcher used a rubric which had been modified from many sources. There were six aspects measured in speaking activities. The first aspect was students’ understanding on task. It included how far the students understood and 46 completed the task. The second aspect was pronunciation. It included how the students pronounced the English words. The third aspect was grammar. It included how the students produced the expressions in the correct form. The fourth aspect was fluency. It included the students’ speed in delivering the speech. The fifth and sixth aspects were politeness and enthusiasm. Those characteristics included the students’ attitude in having communication with other people. Each aspect was labeled by score one up to five. Each score had own criteria. The criteria of each score could be seen below. Table 3.1 The Rubric for Speaking Tests No Aspect Score Criteria 1 Task 1 Minimal attempt to complete the task andor responses frequently inappropriate. 2 Partial completion of the task yet needs help in handling any complication or difficulties. 3 Partial completion of the task, responses mostly appropriate yet undeveloped. 4 Completion of the task responses appropriately and adequately developed. 5 Completion of the task perfectly, responds with elaboration. 2 Pronun- ciation 1 Frequent errors, little or no communication. 2 Some mispronunciations and a very heavy accent make understanding difficult, require frequent repetition. 3 Mispronunciations do not interfere with understanding, show the “foreign accent” 4 Errors in pronunciation are quite rare. 5 No conspicuous mispronunciations. 3 Grammar 1 Frequent inadequate andor inaccurate use of basic language structure. 2 Producing constant errors frequently shows uncontrolled of using major patterns. 3 Producing constant errors that cause misunderstanding. 4 Producing some errors but it can be understood. 5 Control of grammar is good. Few errors, with no pattern of failure. 4 Fluency 1 Speech is so halting with long pauses andor incomplete thoughts. 2 Speech is very slow andor with frequent pauses, few and no incomplete thoughts for short or routine sentences.