69 3  The rules of the game were still quite confusing for the students although the
researcher provided the simulation. 4  Some students admitted that the cards were so small. It was difficult to shuffle
the card. Based on this reflection  in  cycle  one, the  researcher decided to  continue  the
second cycle. The second cycle focused more on how the students developed the idea  when  they  were  speaking.  They  needed  to  manage  their  idea  to  reduce
unnecessary  pauses.  In  cycle  two,  the  researcher  would  like  to  add  a  speaking activity by using communication cards.
2. The Use of Cue Cards in Cycle Two
The second cycle was conducted on the 5
th
and 12
th
of September 2014. The focus of the second cycle was on how the students developed the idea when they
were  speaking.  To  conduct  the  second  cycle,  the  researcher  still  followed  the stages of classroom action research proposed by Kemmis and McTaggart 1988.
The detailed explanation of the use of cue cards in cycle two would be presented in the following explanation.
a. Planning
The researcher designed lesson plan as the  guidelines  to  conduct the second cycle. Cycle two was designed to solve the problems found in the first cycle of the
research. From the reflection done in the first cycle, the researcher focused more on how the students  developed the idea when they were speaking. The activities
70 on the lesson plan of cycle two were designed based on the standard competence
in the 2013 Curriculum that should be accomplished by the students. In the planning stage of the second cycle, the researcher also designed the cue
cards, which were the main media applied in this research. The topic for cycle two was  Expressions  of  Giving  and  Responding  to  Compliments.  In  cycle  two,  the
techniques  that  were  used  to  implement  the  cue  cards  were  the  card  game  and communication  card.  Communication  card  contained  the  clues  which  involved
two students to make dialogue spontaneously. The  researcher  also  designed  handouts  to  minimize  the  explanation.  The
handouts  contained  the  examples  of  Expressions  of  Giving  and  Responding  to Compliments  and  the  examples  of  the  use  of  those  expressions  in  dialogues.  By
using the handouts, the students could read the materials by themselves so that the researcher  did  not  need  to  explain  all  materials.  Otherwise,  the  researcher  just
needed to deliver the main points to the students. To  help  the  students  who  still  had  difficulty  in  understanding  the  meaning,
the  researcher  provided  Power  Point  slides.  On  the  slide,  the  researcher  showed the words and asked the students to find the difficult ones. It also gave chances to
the students to ask about the pronunciation of the words. The researcher prepared the assessment sheet and also the rubric to assess the
students’ ability in speaking. The speaking aspects assessed were task completion, pronunciation,  grammar,  and  fluency.  There  was  also  assessment  for  attitude  to
support the assessment in the 2013 Curriculum. The attitude aspects assessed here were politeness and enthusiasm.
71
b. Acting
In cycle two, there were two meetings. Each meeting consisted of 90 minutes. The  first  meeting  would  be  allocated  to  identify  the  pattern  of  Expression  of
Giving  and  Responding  to  Compliments  and  to  practice  using  the  Expression  of Giving  and  Responding  to  Compliments  in  the  form  of  meaningful  drills.
Meanwhile,  the  second  meeting  would  be  used  to  practice  the  Expression  of Giving  and  Responding  to  Compliments  for  daily  conversation.  In  this  meeting,
the students would have speaking test.
1 First Meeting
In  the  beginning  of  the  class,  the  students  did  not  know  the  meaning  of  the word
“compliment”. It was not familiar for them. The researcher needed to give brief  illustration  about  it.  In  the  observing  activity,  the  students  observed  the
Expression of Giving and Responding to Compliments by watching a video. The students watched the video three times. After the second playing, the teacher gave
some  grading  questions  related  to  the  general  idea  of  the  video  to  dig  up  the students’  understanding.  After  the  third  playing,  the  students  were  asked  to
mention the Expressions of Giving and Responding to Compliments. The students successfully mentioned all of the expressions. The same as the previous cycle, the
students  repeated  the  conversation  in  the  video  and  indentified  the  structure  of Expressions  of  Giving  and  Responding  to  Compliments.  Repeating  the
conversation  was  important  in  order  to  know  the  correct  intonation  while identifying  the  structure  of  those  expressions  helped  the  students  produce  the
expression with correct grammar.
72 Due to the second activity of Scientific Approach which was questioning, the
students  were  expected  to  ask  about  the  material.  There  was  one  student  who asked about adverbial of manner. The researcher invited the whole class to discuss
the questions since the understanding of adverbial of manner was quite important. Fortunately,  the  students’  understanding  about  adverbial  of  manner  was  quite
good. Therefore it did not take a long time. The next activity was experimenting. In this activity, the students experienced
to  use  the  expressions.  To  give  the  experience,  the  researcher  provided  the  card game. The nature of the card game in cycle two was almost the same as the game
in  cycle  one.  The  goal  of  the  card  game  in  cycle  two  was  the  students  were accustomed  to  speaking  English  and  able  to  produce  the  Expressions  of  Giving
and  Responding  to  Compliments  in  correct  pronunciation,  intonation  and grammar.  The  technique  used  was  meaningful  drill,  which  was  proposed  by
Paulston 1970. The researcher showed a slide which consisted of the words they were going
to use. This slide helped them to know the meaning and the pronunciation of the words. This activity was important since the students’ vocabulary was still limited
and the students did not know the correct pronunciation. After that, the researcher explained how to play the card game in this cycle. As the pre-work to conduct the
game,  the  researcher  showed  a  slide  which  contained  a  picture  and  two  words. From showing the slide, the researcher asked the students to make an Expression
of  Giving  and  Responding  to  Compliments.  Then,  the  researcher  showed  some other slides and gave the same task.
73 The rules of the game were almost similar to the previous one. The students
sat in a group that consisted of four people. Every group got a set of cards. A set of cards consisted of 25 pairs of cards. The total of the cards in one set of the card
game were 50 cards. After the cards were shuffled, the cards were distributed to each  member  in  the  group.  However,  not  all  cards  were  distributed.  In  the
beginning, each member of the group only got  four or five cards. The remaining cards were put in the center.
The card game required the students to have interaction with their friends. This game involved the students to use the Expressions of Giving and Responding
to  Compliments.  To  play  this  game,  one  of  the  members  gave  a  compliment  to another  member  using  the  clues  provided  in  the  card.  If  the  member  who  was
asked had the same card, the one who produced the compliment gave the cards to the  one  who  was  asked.  The  one  who  got  the  cards  gave  the  response.  If  the
students  asked,  did  not  have  the  same  card,  he  or  she  could  not  get  the  card. Meanwhile  the  one  who  produced  the  compliment  took  a  new  card  from  the
remaining  ones  in  the  center.  The  winner  of  the  games  was  the  one  who  could collect the twin cards the most.
Figure 4.3 A Cue Card for Expressions of Giving and Responding to Compliments
[cool]
car