The Nature of Cue Cards
                                                                                28 communicative drills. In mechanical drills, the students do not need to understand
the meaning of the words or the sentences because there is a pattern to control the responses.  The  purpose  of  mechanical  drills  is  the  students  can  give  responses
completely  in  good  sentence  construction,  proper  pronunciation  and  intonation. An example of a mechanical drill would be presented as follows.
Pattern : I’m holding a book.
Cue : Magazine
Response : I’m holding a magazine.
Cue : Banana
Response : I’m holding a banana. Rivers, 1983, p. 45
In  meaningful  drills,  the  students  must  have  understanding  completely  in
grammar  and  meaning  although  there  is  still  a  pattern  to  control  the  responses. The  students  must  understand  the  meaning  of  the  cue  to  make  a  meaningful
conversation. The following conversation is an example of a meaningful drill: Question
: When did you arrive this morning? Answer
: I arrived at nine o’clock. Question
: When will you leave this evening? Answer
: I’ll leave at six o’clock. Rivers, 1983, p. 45 In communicative drills, the students must have understood completely in
grammar  and  semantic  but  there  is  not  any  pattern  to  control  the  response.  The students  have  free  choices  to  answer.  However,  Paulston  1970  underlines
“..whatever  control  there  is  lies  in  the  stimulus….  It  still  remains  a  drill  rather than free communication because we are still within the realm of the cue-response
pattern ”  as  cited  in  Rivers,  1983,  p.  46.  An  example  of  mechanical  drills  is
presented as follows. Question
: What did you have for breakfast?
29 Answer
: I had toast and coffee for breakfast. OR
Answer :  I  slept  late  night
and skipped breakfast so I wouldn’t miss the bus. Rivers, 1983, p. 46
Furthermore,  Palmer  1970  as  cited  by  Rivers  1983,  p.  46  states communication  practice  drills  are  useful  for  teaching  speaking.  Communication
practice  drills  provide  the  students  find  the  response  not  only  in  linguistically acceptable but also in personally relevant to themselves and other people. Palmer
1970 underlines drills shou ld be done carefully to build the students’ characters.
This is the illustration of Palmer’s communication practice drills.
Pattern : I would tell him to shut the door.
Teacher : Karen, if you and Susan came to class at 8 a.m. and it was
winter and the room was dark at 8 a.m., what would you tell Susan?
Karen : I would tell her to turn on the light.
Teacher : And how about  you, Paul, if you were with Mary and you
wanted to read, what would you do? Paul
: I would tell her to turn on the light. Teacher
: You as a boy would tell a girl to do that for you? Now, if you came alone, and I was in the room, what would
you do? Paul
: I would tell you to turn on the light. Teacher
: Then I would throw you out of the class. Rivers, 1983, p.  46
The i llustration above shows that Paul’s response is mechanically correct
but  unfortunately  he  does  not  know  the  implication  of  his  response  in  a  certain setting. In social interaction, it is impolite if young people ask elder people to do
something.  Teacher’s  teasing  in  this  drill  is  used  to  increase  the  students’  self awareness  on  using  the  language.  Rivers  1983,  p.  47  notes  having  training  in
such drills can help the students to be able to produce more original responses.