Theoretical Framework REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE
37 implementation of cue cards was one of teaching techniques which was used to
solve the problem faced by the students in speaking English. Kurt Lewin 1953 as cited in Hopkins 1993 describes classroom action
research as “a spiraling cyclical activities that consisted in analysis, fact finding,
conceptualization, planning execution and more fact-finding or evaluation ” p.
45. In further, Lewin’s idea is developed by Stephen Kemmis 1988, whose are
steps are generally understood as “an action-reflection cycle of planning, acting, observing, and reflecting
” as cited Hopkins, 1993, p.48. The continuation of the cycles shows that there is a change in thinking and a change in action. The
following figure is the summary of Stephen Kemmis’ approach to classroom
action research shown by Hopkins 1993, p. 48.
Figure 3.1 The Stephen Kemmis’s Approach to Classroom Action Research
Hopkins, 1993, p. 48
38 The classroom action research done in SMK Negeri 2 Depok was conducted
based on the framework proposed by Stephen Kemmis. There were three cycles, in which there were four stages in every cycle. In the planning stages, the
researcher analyzed the problems faced by the teacher and students in teaching and learning process. The data were gathered from the observation and interview.
Based on the observation and interview, the students had difficulties to improve their speaking skill. The students were not accustomed to speaking in English.
They were not confident and felt afraid of making mistakes. They had limited vocabulary and did not have enough time to practice speaking. To solve the
problem, the researcher offered a solution by using cue cards as the teaching media. In this step, the researcher designed cue cards based on the topic that
would be learned by the students in X Kimia Industri of SMK Negeri 2 Depok. The researcher also designed the lesson plans as the guidelines to implement cue
cards in the classroom. The second stage in Kemmis’ framework is acting. The acting stage
included the implementation of cue cards as the solutions to the problem faced by the students in X Kimia Industri of SMK Negeri 2 Depok. Cue cards would be
combined with some teaching techniques to attract the students to have meaningful speaking activities. The third stage is observing. The observing stage
cannot be separated from the acting stage. The acting and observing stages in this research were carried out simultaneously. The observing step included the data
gathering. The researcher observed every single event which happened in the class by using observation checklists and field notes. To support data gathered from
39 observation checklist and field notes, the researcher also distributed the
questionnaire and conducted the interview a few hours after finishing the acting stage.
The last stage in this classroom action research was reflecting. The reflection was dealing with the results of the implementation of cue cards in the
class. The results of the reflection in this stage would be the foundation for the researcher to conclude whether the cue cards could really help the students
improve their speaking skill or not. Then, the researcher concluded whether the researcher needed to do the next cycle or ended the cycle. If the researcher needed
to do the next cycle, the result of reflection helped the researcher decide what should be improved in the next cycle.