Planning the Research Research Procedure

55 before they practiced. They did not have enough time to practice speaking. Their time to practice speaking in the class or outside the class was limited so that the students were never accustomed to speaking English. In addition, the results of the speaking test for the first topic in the 2013 Curriculum was not satisfying enough. Table 4.1 presents the results of the students’ speaking scores before the implementation of cue cards. Table 4.1 The Students’ Speaking Scores before the Implementation of Cue Cards Student Task Pronun- ciation Grammar Fluency Polite- ness Final Score Minimum Score 75 1 3 2 2 2 4 52.0 Need improvement 2 3 2 2 1 4 48.0 Need improvement 3 3 2 2 2 4 52.0 Need improvement 4 2 2 2 1 4 44.0 Need improvement 5 2 2 2 2 4 48.0 Need improvement 6 2 2 2 2 4 48.0 Need improvement 7 3 2 2 2 4 52.0 Need improvement 8 2 2 2 2 4 48.0 Need improvement 9 3 2 2 2 4 52.0 Need improvement 10 3 2 2 1 4 48.0 Need improvement 11 3 2 2 2 4 52.0 Need improvement 12 3 3 3 2 4 60.0 Need improvement 13 2 2 2 2 4 48.0 Need improvement 14 2 2 2 2 4 48.0 Need improvement 15 3 2 3 2 4 56.0 Need improvement 16 4 3 3 3 4 68.0 Need improvement 17 3 2 2 1 4 48.0 Need improvement 18 3 2 3 2 4 56.0 Need improvement 19 4 3 3 2 4 64.0 Need improvement 20 4 3 3 3 4 68.0 Need improvement 21 2 2 2 2 4 480 Need improvement 22 4 3 3 2 4 64.0 Need improvement 23 4 3 3 2 4 64.0 Need improvement 24 2 2 2 2 4 48.0 Need improvement 25 4 2 3 3 4 64.0 Need improvement 26 2 2 2 2 4 48.0 Need improvement 27 3 3 2 3 4 60.0 Need improvement 28 3 2 2 2 4 52.0 Need improvement 29 3 2 2 2 4 52.0 Need improvement 30 3 2 2 2 4 52.0 Need improvement 31 4 3 3 3 4 68.0 Need improvement 32 4 2 3 3 4 64.0 Need improvement Average 2.97

2.25 2.34

2.06 4

54.5 56 Based on Table 4.1, it can be seen that students’ speaking skill was very poor. None of the students got score, 75, which was as the minimum score decided by the school policy and the 2013 Curriculum. The average of the final score was only 54. 5. The students’ understanding about the task was 2.9, which meant that the students could finish the task completely but the students needed a confirmation from the teacher. The pronunciation of the students was the lowest aspect. The average of the pronunciation score was 2.25 and it was rounded into 2. From the rubric of the speaking test see Appendix 9, score 2 in the pronunciation section means that the students mispronounced many words. The students tended to produce frequent repetition that was difficult to be understood. The grammar and the fluency of the students were also not good. The average score for the grammar and the fluency was under 3. The students produced constant errors frequently. The students did not master the use of expressions in introducing. The students ’ fluency was the lowest score in the average. The speed was slow and there were frequent pauses. The students could not complete the ideas even for short or routine sentences. To solve the problem that the students faced, the researcher decided to use cue cards in teaching speaking skill. The researcher conceived that cue cards would be an alternative solution to solve the students’ problems. Cue cards contained the texts and pictures which gave the ideas during the speaking. On the other hand, cue cards combined with some teaching techniques required the students be accustomed to speaking in English. Therefore, the students became more confident and were not afraid of making mistakes. The detailed explanation