88 The  next  activity,  which  was  communicating,  was  started  by  providing  the
students a dialogue. The students were asked to read the dialogue. Comprehension questions  were  given  to  dig  up
the  students’  understanding  about  the  dialogue. The students also tried to read the dialogue loudly to practice their pronunciation.
This dialogue was an illustration of the dialogue they were going to perform using communication  cards  provided.  The  pictures  in  Figure  4.8  are  the  examples  of
communication cards used to build a conversation.
Figure 4.8 Communication Cards for Expression of Plans and Intentions
The  pictures  in  Figure  4.8  are  the  examples  of  communication  cards  which used in cycle three. On the cards, there were some pictures and clues for holiday
plans.  This  communication  game  involved  two  students  to  have  dialogue  of planning  during  the  holiday.  There  were  eight  sets  of  communications  cards.
There were 16 groups that practiced speaking in front of the class. Thus, one set of communication cards would be performed twice.
89
c. Observing
The  observing  stage  of  cycle  three  was  done  simultaneously  with  the  acting stage. In the observing stage, the researcher observed every single event happened
during  the  teaching  and  learning  activities.  To  observe  in  the  acting  stage,  the researcher  was  helped  by  observation  checklist  and  field  notes  written  by  the
observer. In  the  first  meeting  of  cycle  three,  the  focus  was  helping  the  students  to
understand the structure of future tens e since the students’ understanding of future
tense  was  weak.  This  meeting  was  very  important  for  the  speaking  activities  on the  second  meeting  of  cycle  three.  Future  tense  was  the  foundation  of  using  the
Expression of using the Expression of Plans and Intentions. On the first  meeting, the students  studied deep on how to  produce  Future
Tense  using  “will”  and  “be  going  to.”  They  also  learned  how  to  produce  the negative  sentences,  interrogative  sentences  and  WH  questions.  On  the  first
meeting, there was not any implementation of cue cards. Cue  cards  were  started  to  be  implemented  in  the  second  meeting  of  cycle
three.  The  first  cue  cards  implemented  were  used  for  playing  the  card  game. During  the  card  game,  the  researcher  observed  the  class  and  made  sure  that  the
students  really spoke in  English. The researcher  found that the students  used the variations  of  Expression  of  Plans  and  Intentions.  The  students  had  been
accustomed to speaking English. They were not shy and did not reduce their voice volume when the teacher observed them closely.
90 On  the  second  implementation  of  cue  cards,  the  students  performed  a
dialogue  using  the  communication  cards.  Before  performing,  the  researcher introduced  them  an  example  of  dialogue.  Then,  the  students  were  given  five
minutes to prepare the dialogue. Surprisingly, the students could perform dialogue very  well.  The  students  were  successfully  in  making  questions  using
“be  going to.
”  They could produce long sentences.  Their fluency also had been improved. There  were  fewer  unnecessary  pauses  so  that  the  students  could  speak  more
naturally.
d. Reflection
Reflecting  on  the  findings  in  the  cycle  three,  the  researcher  found  that  the speaking  skills  of  students  in  X  Kimia  Industri  of  SMK  Negeri  2  Depok  was
getting better after they learned speaking by using cue cards. It could be seen from the  results  of  the  speaking  test  in  the  end  of  the  cycle
.  The  students’  speaking scores in the third cycle was better than those in the previous cycles. Cue cards in
the  third  cycle  of  this  research  had  successfully  helped  the  students  to  improve their speaking ability.
Table 4.6  shows the stud ents’ speaking scores in cycle three. In table 4.6, it
could be concluded that students’ speaking ability was increasing. Twenty eight of the  32  students  88  got  scores  more  than  the  minimum  score,  75.  Only  four
students  got  scores  less  than  the  minimum  score  in  the  2013  Curriculum.  The average score of the
students’ understanding of tasks was above 4, which meant that  the  students  could  complete  the  task  appropriately.  Some  of  them  built  a
conversation  with  some  elaboration.  The  use  of  expression  was  getting  better.
91 During  the  speaking  test,  the  students  produced  appropriate  grammar  and  could
reduce  the  mistakes.  Their  fluency  was  also  getting  better.  They  could  produce long sentences without any mistakes. Table 4.6 is the results
of students’ speaking test in cycle three.
Table 4.6 The Students’ Speaking Scores in Cycle Three
Student Task
Pronun -ciation
Grammar Fluency
Polite -ness
Enthu -siasm
Final Score
Minimum score 75
1 4
3 4
3 5
5 80.0
Successful
2 4
3 4
4 5
5 83.3
Successful
3 4
3 4
4 5
4 80.0
Successful
4 3
3 3
4 5
4 73.3
Need improvement
5 4
3 4
3 5
4 76.7
Successful
6 3
3 3
3 5
4 70.0
Need improvement
7 4
3 4
4 5
5 83.3
Successful
8 3
3 3
4 5
4 73.3
Need improvement
9 4
3 5
4 5
5 86.7
Successful
10 4
3 4
4 5
4 80.0
Successful
11 3
3 4
4 5
5 80.0
Successful
12 5
3 5
4 5
4 86.7
Successful
13 4
3 4
4 5
4 80.0
Successful
14 4
3 3
4 5
4 76.7
Successful
15 4
2 4
4 5
4 76.7
Successful
16 5
3 5
4 5
5 90.0
Successful
17 4
3 3
4 5
5 80.0
Successful
18 4
3 4
5 5
5 86.7
Successful
19 4
3 4
5 5
5 86.7
Successful
20 5
4 4
4 5
5 90.0
Successful
21 5
3 3
5 5
5 86.7
Successful
22 5
4 4
5 5
4 90.0
Successful
23 5
3 4
4 5
5 86.7
Successful
24 4
3 4
3 5
4 76.7
Successful
25 5
3 4
4 5
5 86.7
Successful
26 4
3 3
4 5
4 76.7
Successful
27 5
3 4
4 5
5 86.7
Successful
28 4
3 4
3 5
4 76.7
Successful
29 4
3 4
4 5
5 83.3
Successful
30 3
3 3
3 5
4 70.0
Need improvement
31 5
3 4
5 5
5 90.0
Successful
32 5
3 4
4 5
5 86.7
Successful
Average
4,16
3.03 3,84
3,94 5,00
4,53 81.67
The data gathered from questionnaire showed that students’ perception about
the use of cue cards to improve their speaking ability in cycle three was positive.
92 There  were  32  students  who  filled  in  the  questionnaire.  Table  4.7  shows  the
results of questionnaire distributed in cycle three.
Table 4.7 The Results of Questionnaire in Cycle Three
No Statements
Strongly Disagree
Disagree Agree
Strongly Agree
1. Cue cards improve my English
speaking ability.
0.00 1
3.12 20
62.5 10
31.25
2. Cue cards give me the idea of
what I am going to say.
0.00 0.00
20 62.5
12 37.5
3. I can speak more fluently after
learning English using cue cards.
0.00 0.00
19 59.38
13 40.62
4. I can speak more confidently
after learning English using cue cards
0.00 2
6.25 21
65.6 9
28.12
5. I can speak naturally after
learning English using cue cards
0.00 1
3.12 21
65.6 10
31.25
6. I can speak spontaneously after
learning English using cue cards.
0.00 0.00
22 68.75
10 31.25
7. I am happy to study English
speaking using cue cards.
0.00 1
3.12 17
53.13 14
43.75
8. Cue cards in teaching and
learning English is attractive.
0.00 0.00
17 53.13
15 46.87
9. Cue cards motivate me to
participate more actively in the teaching-learning activities.
0.00 0.00
19 59.38
13 3.12
10.  Cue cards in teaching and learning English is very useful.
0.00 0.00
15 46.87
17 53.13
Total X 5
191 125
Total X Point 10
573 500
Total Points 1093
Mean 34.15
In t able 4.7, the researcher could see the students’ perception toward the use
of  cue  cards  to  improve  their  speaking  skill.  As  described  in  Chapter  Three,  the researcher  calculated  its  mean  score  to  conclude  the  data  gathered  from  the
questionnaire. The perception is positive if the mean score is higher than 25. If the mean  score  equals  or  is  less  than  25,  it  means  that  the  students  have  a  negative
93 perception. In table 4.7, the mean score was 32.40. It could be concluded that the
students’ perception about the use of cue cards was positive. The  second  part  of  questionnaire,  which  consisted  of  five  open-ended
questions,  showed  the  st udents’ personal opinions about the use of cue cards in
teaching  and  learning.  According  to  the  students,  cue  cards  were  very  useful  in learning  speaking  skills.  The  cues  on  the  cards  helped  the  students  to  speak
spontaneously.  Moreover,  learning  speaking  using  cue  cards  was  interesting  and did  not  make  them  felt  bored  or  sleepy.  It  was  also  fun  and  did  not  make  them
afraid although the chances of speaking English were a lot. The  interview  was  conducted  after  the  students  filled  in  the  questionnaire
since t he goal of conducting interview was to confirm the students’ answers in the
questionnaire. The students also confirmed that the cue cards were very useful in learning  speaking  skills.  The  students  confirmed  that  cue  cards  helped  them  to
understand the material faster and deeper. The students also admitted that they felt more confident because they had practiced to produce those expressions for many
times. The  same  as  the  previous  cycle,  the  use  of  cue  cards  was  running  in
accordance  with  the  lesson  plan.  The  evidence  was  provided  through  field  notes and  observation  checklist  filled  in  by  the  observer.  Through  the  observation
checklist  and  field  notes,  the  data  presented  that  the  students  showed  positive attitude to the use of cue cards. The students were enthusiastic in playing the card
game and performing the dialogue.