The department accepted the subsequent recommendation made in the earlier
2.64 In
both cases, the committee member that had the conflict was recorded in the minutes as being a spokesperson for the relevant applications. Program performance measurement2.65 The
CGGs stated that grants administration should focus on the delivery of government outcomes. 77 ANAO’s Grants Administration Better Practice Guide also highlights the importance of developing a performanceevaluation framework during the design phase of a program. For the programs, the responsibilities of the program delegate and the grant recipient, in terms of monitoring and evaluation, were identified in the program guidelines, but were not supported by an evaluation strategy. The department advised ANAO in July 2014 that: It was anticipated that the Program would be evaluated in 201516. A formal evaluation strategy has not yet been prepared. However, [the department has] given detailed consideration to the project metrics that would be required to support a program evaluation.2.66 This
advice was updated by the department in October 2014 to reflect that the evaluation is planned for 2016–17 rather than 2015–16 and that this timing has been reflected in the department’s forward evaluation plan. The department further advised ANAO that: A robust measurement and verification regime has been introduced with more than 70 different metrics from completed projects and that due diligence is being undertaken on reported data 78 with a view to preparing a detailed evidence base for the evaluation. As at 16 September 2014, 192 projects have been finished this does not include projects that have been terminated. After measurement and verification it is estimated that these projects will abate over 1,730 kilotonnes of carbon which exceeds and is generally consistent with what was recommended by the Committee and approved by the Program Delegate 1,713 kilotonnes. Program Management undertakes a thorough due diligence process. It also undertakes measurement and verification training with the State Office network. 77 Department of Finance and Deregulation, Commonwealth Grant Guidelines, July 2009, p. 17. 78 Program documentation stated that a post-project report must include: an independent financial audit of the total eligible expenditure; an update of the estimates of financial benefits provided in the application; and measurements and supporting evidence of the verified energy or carbon savings delivery by the project.Parts
» The After The Program Design
» The The Program Program Design
» The However, A Program Design
» The situation in relation to the programs was similar to that identified in
» The department accepted the subsequent recommendation made in the earlier
» The program guidelines and IA’s disclosure of interest guidelines set out
» Notwithstanding the requirements of IA disclosure of interest guidelines,
» There Further, Program Design
» The The Performance Program Design
» Effective In In Access to Funding
» Relatively Access to Funding
» Determining Access to Funding
» However, The Access to Funding
» Consistent Access to Funding
» Specifically, In Access to Funding
» In Consistent Access to Funding
» Cabinet In The Access to Funding
» Accordingly, The Reduction in Emissions
» The The Reduction in Emissions
» In This The Reduction in Emissions
» In November 2013, the department noted in a review of the programs that:
» For example, one applicant that received funding under the programs initially
» In The Reduction in Emissions
» Another Reduction in Emissions
» As In In Reduction in Emissions
» However, The Reduction in Emissions
» As The Reduction in Emissions
» The In Reduction in Emissions
» Further, Reduction in Emissions
» There This Reduction in Emissions
» Agreed. Reduction in Emissions
» The In In Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» In Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» Given Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» The The Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» In The Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» Further, following the then Government’s decision to bring forward the introduction
» From the information provided in paragraphs 5.9 and 5.10, it is clear that
» However, this indicator was inconsistently applied in assessing applications,
» A Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» In In In Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» Overall, Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» The Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» Following The Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» The most common reason recorded for not recommending an application
» As Against A Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» Nevertheless, Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» To Part Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» Part Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» The Reporting and Funding Distribution
» Website In Reporting and Funding Distribution
» Reporting In Reporting and Funding Distribution
» Publication The Reporting and Funding Distribution
Show more