The The In Introduction
1.18 ANAO
also interviewed officials from the department and discussed the implementation of the programs with the chairs of the Clean Technology Investment Committee CTIC and the Clean Technology Food and Foundries Investment Committee CTFFIC.1.19 The
audit has referenced the grants framework that was in place at the time that the programs operated in particular, the Finance Management and Accountability Act 1997 FMA Act, Financial Management and Accountability Regulations 1997 FMA Regulations and the Commonwealth Grant Guidelines CGGs. The framework changed after the programs had closed, with implementation of the grants‐related elements of the Public Governance, Performance and Accountability Act 2013 PGPA Act taking effect from 1 July 2014. In this respect, unless stated otherwise, similar arrangements exist under the current framework PGPA Act and the Commonwealth Grant Rules and Guidelines CGRGs.1.20 The
audit was conducted in accordance with ANAO auditing standards at a cost to ANAO of 754 000. Report structure1.21 The
structure of the report is outlined in Table 1.2. Table 1.2: Structure of the report Chapter title Chapter overview 2. Program Design Examines the design of the programs, including the key roles and responsibilities for managing the programs as well as the department’s approach to evaluating the outcomes of the projects funded in relation to reduced carbon emissions. 3. Access to Funding Analyses the approach to assessing applications, including the reframing of applications throughout the merit assessment process. 4. Reduction in Emissions In the context of the program objective, examines the assessment of the extent to which applications would reduce carbon emissions intensity. 5. Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions Outlines the advice provided to the decision maker by the department and Innovation Australia, as well as the funding decisions that have been taken.6. Reporting and Funding Distribution
Examines compliance with relevant grant reporting obligations and analyses the distribution of funding.Parts
» The After The Program Design
» The The Program Program Design
» The However, A Program Design
» The situation in relation to the programs was similar to that identified in
» The department accepted the subsequent recommendation made in the earlier
» The program guidelines and IA’s disclosure of interest guidelines set out
» Notwithstanding the requirements of IA disclosure of interest guidelines,
» There Further, Program Design
» The The Performance Program Design
» Effective In In Access to Funding
» Relatively Access to Funding
» Determining Access to Funding
» However, The Access to Funding
» Consistent Access to Funding
» Specifically, In Access to Funding
» In Consistent Access to Funding
» Cabinet In The Access to Funding
» Accordingly, The Reduction in Emissions
» The The Reduction in Emissions
» In This The Reduction in Emissions
» In November 2013, the department noted in a review of the programs that:
» For example, one applicant that received funding under the programs initially
» In The Reduction in Emissions
» Another Reduction in Emissions
» As In In Reduction in Emissions
» However, The Reduction in Emissions
» As The Reduction in Emissions
» The In Reduction in Emissions
» Further, Reduction in Emissions
» There This Reduction in Emissions
» Agreed. Reduction in Emissions
» The In In Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» In Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» Given Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» The The Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» In The Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» Further, following the then Government’s decision to bring forward the introduction
» From the information provided in paragraphs 5.9 and 5.10, it is clear that
» However, this indicator was inconsistently applied in assessing applications,
» A Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» In In In Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» Overall, Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» The Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» Following The Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» The most common reason recorded for not recommending an application
» As Against A Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» Nevertheless, Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» To Part Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» Part Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» The Reporting and Funding Distribution
» Website In Reporting and Funding Distribution
» Reporting In Reporting and Funding Distribution
» Publication The Reporting and Funding Distribution
Show more