The A The WGEA Home
35. The
grants administration framework has a particular focus on the establishment of transparent and accountable grant decision‐making processes. In this context, the program delegate accepted all recommendations that were received in terms of those applications that should be awarded funding, and those that should be rejected. However, there were a number of shortcomings in the advice provided to the delegate to inform funding decisions. Specifically: the records that supported the IA assessment did not demonstrate that each application was assessed against each of the merit criteria; the advice provided to the delegate did not demonstrate that the recommended applications rated highly against each of the merit criteria; and the advice to the delegate did not clearly identify the expected outcomes from funding each recommended project. 36 Reporting and Funding Distribution Chapter 636. The
departmentʹs website reporting of grants made under the programs was largely consistent with the reporting requirements of the CGGs and associated guidance. Further, the application, assessment and decision‐ making processes for the programs guarded against the award of funding being politicised. ANAO analysis of the distribution of funding awarded under the programs did not identify any political bias. Of note in this respect was that, although the total value of grants to electorates held by the then Government was greater, the approval rate for grants to electorates held by then Opposition was slightly higher. Summary of entity response37. The
proposed audit report was provided to the department and extracts were provided to the former chairs of the Clean Technology 35 Of the 1171 applications that were received by the department, 102 applications were withdrawn, 61 applications were found to be ineligible and 159 applications were not assessed due to the closure of the programs. 36 The delegate was provided with expected outcomes for 224 applications 28 per cent of applications considered by the delegate. ANAO Report No.11 2014–15 The Award of Grants under the Clean Technology ProgramParts
» The After The Program Design
» The The Program Program Design
» The However, A Program Design
» The situation in relation to the programs was similar to that identified in
» The department accepted the subsequent recommendation made in the earlier
» The program guidelines and IA’s disclosure of interest guidelines set out
» Notwithstanding the requirements of IA disclosure of interest guidelines,
» There Further, Program Design
» The The Performance Program Design
» Effective In In Access to Funding
» Relatively Access to Funding
» Determining Access to Funding
» However, The Access to Funding
» Consistent Access to Funding
» Specifically, In Access to Funding
» In Consistent Access to Funding
» Cabinet In The Access to Funding
» Accordingly, The Reduction in Emissions
» The The Reduction in Emissions
» In This The Reduction in Emissions
» In November 2013, the department noted in a review of the programs that:
» For example, one applicant that received funding under the programs initially
» In The Reduction in Emissions
» Another Reduction in Emissions
» As In In Reduction in Emissions
» However, The Reduction in Emissions
» As The Reduction in Emissions
» The In Reduction in Emissions
» Further, Reduction in Emissions
» There This Reduction in Emissions
» Agreed. Reduction in Emissions
» The In In Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» In Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» Given Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» The The Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» In The Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» Further, following the then Government’s decision to bring forward the introduction
» From the information provided in paragraphs 5.9 and 5.10, it is clear that
» However, this indicator was inconsistently applied in assessing applications,
» A Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» In In In Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» Overall, Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» The Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» Following The Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» The most common reason recorded for not recommending an application
» As Against A Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» Nevertheless, Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» To Part Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» Part Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» The Reporting and Funding Distribution
» Website In Reporting and Funding Distribution
» Reporting In Reporting and Funding Distribution
» Publication The Reporting and Funding Distribution
Show more