Website In Reporting and Funding Distribution
6.8 Reporting
of at least seven per cent of grants was, therefore, inconsistent with the CGGs requirement to report the ‘grant term’ in months and, failing that, Finance’s advice that the total duration must be reflected in the website reporting. AusIndustry reporting6.9 In
addition to publishing information on grants executed under the programs on the department’s website to comply with the CGGs requirements, grants approved under the programs were published on AusIndustry’s website to ‘assist potential customers better understand the type of projects that were supportable’. 1436.10 Publication
of both the executed and approved amounts on two different websites had the potential to confuse stakeholders, as the reporting used inconsistent grant amounts reporting the executed amount inclusive of GST on the department’s website, but the approved amount exclusive of GST on the AusIndustry website. In this respect, the department advised ANAO that the grant recipient details for publication were generated using two different processes. The list of grantees published on the department’s website was generated using its finance payments system, while the list published on the AusIndustry website was based on information in the department’s grants management system, with the project description confirmed with the grant recipient prior to the information being published.6.11 The
department has committed to streamlining its reporting process. In this context, since the closure of the programs, the AusIndustry website has been merged with similar websites to form a single consolidated website for business. 144 143 In line with the department’s advice, the AusIndustry website reporting included additional information that was not required by CGGs reporting, including the industry sector and form of energy efficiency or emissions reduction measures contained in approved projects. 144 See www.business.gov.au . ANAO Report No.11 2014–15 The Award of Grants under the Clean Technology ProgramParts
» The After The Program Design
» The The Program Program Design
» The However, A Program Design
» The situation in relation to the programs was similar to that identified in
» The department accepted the subsequent recommendation made in the earlier
» The program guidelines and IA’s disclosure of interest guidelines set out
» Notwithstanding the requirements of IA disclosure of interest guidelines,
» There Further, Program Design
» The The Performance Program Design
» Effective In In Access to Funding
» Relatively Access to Funding
» Determining Access to Funding
» However, The Access to Funding
» Consistent Access to Funding
» Specifically, In Access to Funding
» In Consistent Access to Funding
» Cabinet In The Access to Funding
» Accordingly, The Reduction in Emissions
» The The Reduction in Emissions
» In This The Reduction in Emissions
» In November 2013, the department noted in a review of the programs that:
» For example, one applicant that received funding under the programs initially
» In The Reduction in Emissions
» Another Reduction in Emissions
» As In In Reduction in Emissions
» However, The Reduction in Emissions
» As The Reduction in Emissions
» The In Reduction in Emissions
» Further, Reduction in Emissions
» There This Reduction in Emissions
» Agreed. Reduction in Emissions
» The In In Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» In Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» Given Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» The The Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» In The Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» Further, following the then Government’s decision to bring forward the introduction
» From the information provided in paragraphs 5.9 and 5.10, it is clear that
» However, this indicator was inconsistently applied in assessing applications,
» A Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» In In In Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» Overall, Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» The Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» Following The Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» The most common reason recorded for not recommending an application
» As Against A Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» Nevertheless, Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» To Part Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» Part Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» The Reporting and Funding Distribution
» Website In Reporting and Funding Distribution
» Reporting In Reporting and Funding Distribution
» Publication The Reporting and Funding Distribution
Show more