It A Reduction in Emissions
5. Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
This chapter outlines the advice provided to the decision maker by the department and Innovation Australia, as well as the funding decisions that have been taken. Introduction5.1 The
program delegate was responsible for making all funding decisions under the programs. Consistent with the delegate’s broader responsibilities under the Australian Government’s financial management legislation, the delegate also needed to satisfy the requirements of an ‘approver’ for the purposes of the FMA Regulations. 123 In this context, ANAO examined the final merit assessment, recommendation and decision of the 814 applications that were considered by the delegate. 124 Innovation Australia committee assessment5.2 In
April 2012, the program management area of the department advised IA committee members that: The purpose of the carbon scoring tool is to ensure that AusIndustry Customer Service Managers take a uniform approach to scoring against this criterion. Committee members may wish to score on some other basis. For Merit Criterion 1, Committee Members are asked to give applicants a score out of 70. We are assuming that your score will reflect your level of confidence in the values for the indicators provided in the application and your consideration of the competitiveness of the values of those indicators and their relative importance in overall performance against this criterion.5.3 In
September 2014, the department advised ANAO that the process for the CTIC and CTFFIC’s consideration of applications included: 123 Up until 30 June 2014, this obligation was provided for under FMA Regulation 9. From 1 July 2014, this obligation was provided for under section 15 of the PGPA Act, which requires accountable authorities to govern Commonwealth entities in a way that, amongst other things, promotes the proper use and management of public resources and the financial stability of the entity, and section 23 of the PGPA Act, which provides the power for accountable authorities to enter into arrangements. 124 Of the 849 applications that were assessed against the merit criteria, 35 were not considered by the program delegate due to the closure of the programs. ANAO Report No.11 2014–15 The Award of Grants under the Clean Technology ProgramParts
» The After The Program Design
» The The Program Program Design
» The However, A Program Design
» The situation in relation to the programs was similar to that identified in
» The department accepted the subsequent recommendation made in the earlier
» The program guidelines and IA’s disclosure of interest guidelines set out
» Notwithstanding the requirements of IA disclosure of interest guidelines,
» There Further, Program Design
» The The Performance Program Design
» Effective In In Access to Funding
» Relatively Access to Funding
» Determining Access to Funding
» However, The Access to Funding
» Consistent Access to Funding
» Specifically, In Access to Funding
» In Consistent Access to Funding
» Cabinet In The Access to Funding
» Accordingly, The Reduction in Emissions
» The The Reduction in Emissions
» In This The Reduction in Emissions
» In November 2013, the department noted in a review of the programs that:
» For example, one applicant that received funding under the programs initially
» In The Reduction in Emissions
» Another Reduction in Emissions
» As In In Reduction in Emissions
» However, The Reduction in Emissions
» As The Reduction in Emissions
» The In Reduction in Emissions
» Further, Reduction in Emissions
» There This Reduction in Emissions
» Agreed. Reduction in Emissions
» The In In Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» In Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» Given Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» The The Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» In The Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» Further, following the then Government’s decision to bring forward the introduction
» From the information provided in paragraphs 5.9 and 5.10, it is clear that
» However, this indicator was inconsistently applied in assessing applications,
» A Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» In In In Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» Overall, Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» The Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» Following The Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» The most common reason recorded for not recommending an application
» As Against A Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» Nevertheless, Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» To Part Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» Part Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» The Reporting and Funding Distribution
» Website In Reporting and Funding Distribution
» Reporting In Reporting and Funding Distribution
» Publication The Reporting and Funding Distribution
Show more