Effective In In Access to Funding
3.8 These
errors occurred despite the department developing a procedure that each eligibility checklist be reviewed by a more senior official from AusIndustry’s State Office Network.3.9 Following
the eligibility assessment process, the department’s procedures required that applicants be provided with written advice that their application was either: ineligible; incomplete; or eligible. Given the potential for applicants to revise andor resubmit applications at any time, it was important for accurate feedback to be provided in correspondence for ineligible and incomplete applications. In this respect, the applicant for each of the 61 applications assessed as ineligible received a letter advising them of the reasons why their application was ineligible. Approach taken to incomplete applications3.10 Determining
whether additional information will be sought or accepted from applicants to assist in the assessment process should be based upon appropriate consideration that weighs any risks to maintaining equity and probity against the need to ensure funding decisions are appropriately informed. 87 While the department adopted an application process that allowed applicants to submit applications at any time, the customer guidelines for the programs identified that incomplete applications would not be assessed, noting: Your application is the sole source of information available to AusIndustry for the assessment of the eligibility and merit of your application. No further written or oral explanation, or further documentation, should be required. Before you submit an application, check to ensure all information is complete and accurate. An application that is incomplete will not be assessed. 87 ANAO Better Practice Guide, Implementing Better Practice Grants Administration, June 2010, p. 47. ANAO Report No.11 2014–15 The Award of Grants under the Clean Technology ProgramParts
» The After The Program Design
» The The Program Program Design
» The However, A Program Design
» The situation in relation to the programs was similar to that identified in
» The department accepted the subsequent recommendation made in the earlier
» The program guidelines and IA’s disclosure of interest guidelines set out
» Notwithstanding the requirements of IA disclosure of interest guidelines,
» There Further, Program Design
» The The Performance Program Design
» Effective In In Access to Funding
» Relatively Access to Funding
» Determining Access to Funding
» However, The Access to Funding
» Consistent Access to Funding
» Specifically, In Access to Funding
» In Consistent Access to Funding
» Cabinet In The Access to Funding
» Accordingly, The Reduction in Emissions
» The The Reduction in Emissions
» In This The Reduction in Emissions
» In November 2013, the department noted in a review of the programs that:
» For example, one applicant that received funding under the programs initially
» In The Reduction in Emissions
» Another Reduction in Emissions
» As In In Reduction in Emissions
» However, The Reduction in Emissions
» As The Reduction in Emissions
» The In Reduction in Emissions
» Further, Reduction in Emissions
» There This Reduction in Emissions
» Agreed. Reduction in Emissions
» The In In Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» In Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» Given Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» The The Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» In The Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» Further, following the then Government’s decision to bring forward the introduction
» From the information provided in paragraphs 5.9 and 5.10, it is clear that
» However, this indicator was inconsistently applied in assessing applications,
» A Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» In In In Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» Overall, Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» The Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» Following The Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» The most common reason recorded for not recommending an application
» As Against A Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» Nevertheless, Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» To Part Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» Part Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» The Reporting and Funding Distribution
» Website In Reporting and Funding Distribution
» Reporting In Reporting and Funding Distribution
» Publication The Reporting and Funding Distribution
Show more