The To Access to Funding
4.4 The
values for these indicators were to be calculated using the Carbon and Energy Savings Calculator the calculator provided on AusIndustry’s website. To generate these values, applicants were required to: identify the activities on a site or multiple sites that related to the manufacturing activities for which funding was sought, as opposed to other activities such as corporate management; select an activity boundary from which emissions were estimated—this could have been the whole or part of a manufacturing site; identify a period of time over which to measure baseline emissions intensity that was typical of the normal production process and did not include one‐off or unusually large periods of activity; estimate future production levels based on realistic sales forecasts and associated energy use; and identify the effective life of the emissions reduction measures.4.5 The
scoring methodology developed by the department then allocated a score against merit criterion one using the two indicators. The score for indicator one was based on the percentage reduction in carbon emissions intensity, while the score for indicator two was based on grant funds per tonne of carbon abated which was the total carbon savings over the life of the conservation measure relative to the amount of grant funds requested. 112 The 111 Greenhouse gases are produced, for example, when burning coal or natural gas to generate the electricity that powers a manufacturing process. The most common greenhouse gas is carbon dioxide. There are five other main types of greenhouse gases: methane, nitrous oxide, hydrofluorocarbons, perfluorocarbons and sulphur hexafluoride. The latter three are synthetic and are either used in industry or created as a by-product of industrial processes. 112 Total carbon savings over the life of the conservation measure was listed in the departmental assessment, but was not a basis for scoring applications.Parts
» The After The Program Design
» The The Program Program Design
» The However, A Program Design
» The situation in relation to the programs was similar to that identified in
» The department accepted the subsequent recommendation made in the earlier
» The program guidelines and IA’s disclosure of interest guidelines set out
» Notwithstanding the requirements of IA disclosure of interest guidelines,
» There Further, Program Design
» The The Performance Program Design
» Effective In In Access to Funding
» Relatively Access to Funding
» Determining Access to Funding
» However, The Access to Funding
» Consistent Access to Funding
» Specifically, In Access to Funding
» In Consistent Access to Funding
» Cabinet In The Access to Funding
» Accordingly, The Reduction in Emissions
» The The Reduction in Emissions
» In This The Reduction in Emissions
» In November 2013, the department noted in a review of the programs that:
» For example, one applicant that received funding under the programs initially
» In The Reduction in Emissions
» Another Reduction in Emissions
» As In In Reduction in Emissions
» However, The Reduction in Emissions
» As The Reduction in Emissions
» The In Reduction in Emissions
» Further, Reduction in Emissions
» There This Reduction in Emissions
» Agreed. Reduction in Emissions
» The In In Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» In Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» Given Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» The The Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» In The Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» Further, following the then Government’s decision to bring forward the introduction
» From the information provided in paragraphs 5.9 and 5.10, it is clear that
» However, this indicator was inconsistently applied in assessing applications,
» A Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» In In In Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» Overall, Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» The Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» Following The Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» The most common reason recorded for not recommending an application
» As Against A Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» Nevertheless, Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» To Part Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» Part Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» The Reporting and Funding Distribution
» Website In Reporting and Funding Distribution
» Reporting In Reporting and Funding Distribution
» Publication The Reporting and Funding Distribution
Show more