Accordingly, The Reduction in Emissions
4.6 In
June 2014, the department advised ANAO that the second indicator listed in the customer guidelines was assessed using grant funds per tonne of carbon abated, rather than total carbon savings over the life of the conservation measure, because: The dollars per tonne calculation was simply a tool that allowed us to compare and consistently score total carbon savings over the life of the project. In the absence of this tool it would not be possible to objectively measure performance in terms of total carbon savings. Carbon savings varied enormously across applications depending on the size of the project and the nature of the emission reduction measure, ranging from 1064 kilotonnes to 0.35 kilotonnes.4.7 This
methodology was approved by the manufacturing policy area of the department in November 2011 and was based on advice from the Department of Climate Change and Energy Efficiency DCCEE, the Department of Resources, Energy and Tourism, Low Carbon Australia and IA. The department advised ANAO in November 2014 that the customer guidelines were cleared in February 2012 by the then AusIndustry General Manager responsible for the programs after being reviewed by DCCEE and IA. However, the department was unable to identify to ANAO who made the decision not to include the fiscal cost of abatement in the customer guidelines . Percentage reduction in carbon emissions intensity4.8 The
reduction in carbon emissions intensity is the predicted change in the tonnes of greenhouse gases emitted for each unit of output produced by a manufacturer once the proposed emissions reduction measure has been not ANAO Report No.11 2014–15 The Award of Grants under the Clean Technology ProgramParts
» The After The Program Design
» The The Program Program Design
» The However, A Program Design
» The situation in relation to the programs was similar to that identified in
» The department accepted the subsequent recommendation made in the earlier
» The program guidelines and IA’s disclosure of interest guidelines set out
» Notwithstanding the requirements of IA disclosure of interest guidelines,
» There Further, Program Design
» The The Performance Program Design
» Effective In In Access to Funding
» Relatively Access to Funding
» Determining Access to Funding
» However, The Access to Funding
» Consistent Access to Funding
» Specifically, In Access to Funding
» In Consistent Access to Funding
» Cabinet In The Access to Funding
» Accordingly, The Reduction in Emissions
» The The Reduction in Emissions
» In This The Reduction in Emissions
» In November 2013, the department noted in a review of the programs that:
» For example, one applicant that received funding under the programs initially
» In The Reduction in Emissions
» Another Reduction in Emissions
» As In In Reduction in Emissions
» However, The Reduction in Emissions
» As The Reduction in Emissions
» The In Reduction in Emissions
» Further, Reduction in Emissions
» There This Reduction in Emissions
» Agreed. Reduction in Emissions
» The In In Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» In Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» Given Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» The The Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» In The Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» Further, following the then Government’s decision to bring forward the introduction
» From the information provided in paragraphs 5.9 and 5.10, it is clear that
» However, this indicator was inconsistently applied in assessing applications,
» A Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» In In In Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» Overall, Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» The Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» Following The Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» The most common reason recorded for not recommending an application
» As Against A Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» Nevertheless, Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» To Part Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» Part Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» The Reporting and Funding Distribution
» Website In Reporting and Funding Distribution
» Reporting In Reporting and Funding Distribution
» Publication The Reporting and Funding Distribution
Show more