The The The Introduction
2. Program Design
This chapter examines the design of the programs, including the key roles and responsibilities for managing the programs as well as the department’s approach to evaluating the outcomes of the projects funded in relation to reduced carbon emissions. Introduction2.1 From
the time that the programs were announced in July 2011, the department was responsible for the design and implementation of the programs. Accordingly, ANAO examined the extent to which the department designed an appropriate framework for administering the programs through the: program guidelines and other documentation; objective of the programs; program governance arrangements; and key program documentation. Program guidelines2.2 A
key obligation under the CGGs was for all grant programs to have program guidelines in place. Program guidelines play a central role in the conduct of effective, efficient and accountable grants administration, by articulating the policy intent of a program and the supporting administrative arrangements for making funding decisions. 47 Reflecting their importance, the program guidelines represent one of the policy requirements that proposed grants must be consistent with in order to be approved for funding. 482.3 The
CGGs indicated that, where appropriate, consulting stakeholders on grant arrangements could help achieve more efficient and effective grants administration. In this context, the department facilitated an extensive 47 A range of ANAO’s audits of grants administration over a number of years have identified the importance of grant programs being implemented in a manner that accords with published program guidelines. 48 Up until 30 June 2014, this obligation was provided for under FMA Regulation 9. From 1 July 2014, this obligation was provided for under section 21 of the PGPA Act, which requires accountable authorities to govern in a way that is not inconsistent with the policies of the Australian Government. ANAO Report No.11 2014–15 The Award of Grants under the Clean Technology ProgramParts
» The After The Program Design
» The The Program Program Design
» The However, A Program Design
» The situation in relation to the programs was similar to that identified in
» The department accepted the subsequent recommendation made in the earlier
» The program guidelines and IA’s disclosure of interest guidelines set out
» Notwithstanding the requirements of IA disclosure of interest guidelines,
» There Further, Program Design
» The The Performance Program Design
» Effective In In Access to Funding
» Relatively Access to Funding
» Determining Access to Funding
» However, The Access to Funding
» Consistent Access to Funding
» Specifically, In Access to Funding
» In Consistent Access to Funding
» Cabinet In The Access to Funding
» Accordingly, The Reduction in Emissions
» The The Reduction in Emissions
» In This The Reduction in Emissions
» In November 2013, the department noted in a review of the programs that:
» For example, one applicant that received funding under the programs initially
» In The Reduction in Emissions
» Another Reduction in Emissions
» As In In Reduction in Emissions
» However, The Reduction in Emissions
» As The Reduction in Emissions
» The In Reduction in Emissions
» Further, Reduction in Emissions
» There This Reduction in Emissions
» Agreed. Reduction in Emissions
» The In In Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» In Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» Given Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» The The Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» In The Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» Further, following the then Government’s decision to bring forward the introduction
» From the information provided in paragraphs 5.9 and 5.10, it is clear that
» However, this indicator was inconsistently applied in assessing applications,
» A Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» In In In Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» Overall, Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» The Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» Following The Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» The most common reason recorded for not recommending an application
» As Against A Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» Nevertheless, Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» To Part Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» Part Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» The Reporting and Funding Distribution
» Website In Reporting and Funding Distribution
» Reporting In Reporting and Funding Distribution
» Publication The Reporting and Funding Distribution
Show more