Publication The Reporting and Funding Distribution
6.16 The
award of funding was undertaken through a public, open call for applications and was wholly consistent with the IA committees’ recommendations as to which application should be approved. In the context that 62 per cent of approved funding related to projects located in electorates held by the governing party, ANAO also examined whether there was any evidence of the electorate status influencing the process by which applications were received, assessed as to their eligibility and merit, and recommended to the program delegate. As no funding decisions were made by the delegate after the 2013 Federal election was announced, the distribution of funding, provided in Table 6.2, was based on the seats held after the 2010 Federal election. 146 146 Decision-making under the programs ceased after 2 August 2013. The Caretaker period for the 2013 Federal election commenced on 5 August 2013 and the 2013 Federal election was held on 7 September 2013. Table 6.2: Distribution of funding by political party based on seats held after the 2010 Federal election 147 Party holding the electorate in which the project was located Electorate distribution Applications received Applications approved by Program Delegate Grant agreements executed Approval rate Number of sites Funding sought Number of sites Value of funding approved Number of sites Value of agreements m m m ALP 68 49.6 623 53.8 389.2 55.7 365 53.2 175.4 59.3 342 53.0 179.8 61.9 58.6 Coalition 64 46.7 505 43.6 294.1 42.1 304 44.3 118.4 40.0 287 44.5 108.6 37.4 60.2 The Greens 1 0.7 4 0.3 1.4 0.2 2 0.3 0.6 0.2 2 0.3 0.6 0.2 50.0 Independents 4 2.9 25 2.2 13.6 1.9 15 2.2 1.6 0.5 14 2.2 1.4 0.5 60.0 Total 137 100 1157 698.2 100 686 296.0 42 645 290.5 100 NA Source: ANAO analysis of departmental records. 147 The 159 applications that had not been processed prior to the closure of the programs were excluded from the analysis.Parts
» The After The Program Design
» The The Program Program Design
» The However, A Program Design
» The situation in relation to the programs was similar to that identified in
» The department accepted the subsequent recommendation made in the earlier
» The program guidelines and IA’s disclosure of interest guidelines set out
» Notwithstanding the requirements of IA disclosure of interest guidelines,
» There Further, Program Design
» The The Performance Program Design
» Effective In In Access to Funding
» Relatively Access to Funding
» Determining Access to Funding
» However, The Access to Funding
» Consistent Access to Funding
» Specifically, In Access to Funding
» In Consistent Access to Funding
» Cabinet In The Access to Funding
» Accordingly, The Reduction in Emissions
» The The Reduction in Emissions
» In This The Reduction in Emissions
» In November 2013, the department noted in a review of the programs that:
» For example, one applicant that received funding under the programs initially
» In The Reduction in Emissions
» Another Reduction in Emissions
» As In In Reduction in Emissions
» However, The Reduction in Emissions
» As The Reduction in Emissions
» The In Reduction in Emissions
» Further, Reduction in Emissions
» There This Reduction in Emissions
» Agreed. Reduction in Emissions
» The In In Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» In Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» Given Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» The The Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» In The Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» Further, following the then Government’s decision to bring forward the introduction
» From the information provided in paragraphs 5.9 and 5.10, it is clear that
» However, this indicator was inconsistently applied in assessing applications,
» A Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» In In In Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» Overall, Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» The Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» Following The Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» The most common reason recorded for not recommending an application
» As Against A Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» Nevertheless, Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» To Part Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» Part Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» The Reporting and Funding Distribution
» Website In Reporting and Funding Distribution
» Reporting In Reporting and Funding Distribution
» Publication The Reporting and Funding Distribution
Show more