However, The Reduction in Emissions
4.23 The
second version of the rating scale was adopted following a meeting of the IA committee in May 2012 at which the committee members’ discussion was as follows: [Committee member one] was concerned the current indicator 1 scoring is too “tough”. The applicant would only ever achieve the top score if they achieved 80 reduction which may be unrealistic… However, the 6040 split between indicator 1 and 2 seemed fine. [Committee member two] suggested we come up with a new scoring system to reward the really good applicants but not punish the ones that have already done a lot of energy efficiency measures. [Committee member three] suggested a logarithmic scale for the score, and the committee members agreed.4.24 As
the discussion demonstrates, committee members considered that the reduction in carbon emissions intensity that could be achieved by different manufacturers would be driven by the extent to which those manufacturers had already implemented emissions reductions measures. This approach was reflected in the logarithmic scale developed to score the predicted percentage reduction in carbon emissions intensity Figure 4.2. ANAO Report No.11 2014–15 The Award of Grants under the Clean Technology Program 99 Figure 4.2: The logarithmic scale for indicator one Source: ANAO analysis of logarithmic scale used for indicator one that was developed by the Clean Technology Investment Committee and the department.Parts
» The After The Program Design
» The The Program Program Design
» The However, A Program Design
» The situation in relation to the programs was similar to that identified in
» The department accepted the subsequent recommendation made in the earlier
» The program guidelines and IA’s disclosure of interest guidelines set out
» Notwithstanding the requirements of IA disclosure of interest guidelines,
» There Further, Program Design
» The The Performance Program Design
» Effective In In Access to Funding
» Relatively Access to Funding
» Determining Access to Funding
» However, The Access to Funding
» Consistent Access to Funding
» Specifically, In Access to Funding
» In Consistent Access to Funding
» Cabinet In The Access to Funding
» Accordingly, The Reduction in Emissions
» The The Reduction in Emissions
» In This The Reduction in Emissions
» In November 2013, the department noted in a review of the programs that:
» For example, one applicant that received funding under the programs initially
» In The Reduction in Emissions
» Another Reduction in Emissions
» As In In Reduction in Emissions
» However, The Reduction in Emissions
» As The Reduction in Emissions
» The In Reduction in Emissions
» Further, Reduction in Emissions
» There This Reduction in Emissions
» Agreed. Reduction in Emissions
» The In In Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» In Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» Given Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» The The Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» In The Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» Further, following the then Government’s decision to bring forward the introduction
» From the information provided in paragraphs 5.9 and 5.10, it is clear that
» However, this indicator was inconsistently applied in assessing applications,
» A Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» In In In Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» Overall, Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» The Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» Following The Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» The most common reason recorded for not recommending an application
» As Against A Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» Nevertheless, Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» To Part Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» Part Advice to the Program Delegate and Funding Decisions
» The Reporting and Funding Distribution
» Website In Reporting and Funding Distribution
» Reporting In Reporting and Funding Distribution
» Publication The Reporting and Funding Distribution
Show more