Pendapatan dan Pekerjaan Frequency Table

Lanjutan lampiran 2. Crosstabs Case Processing Summary Cases Valid Missing Total N Percent N Percent N Percent pekerjaan pendapatan 100 100.0 .0 100 100.0 pekerjaan pendapatan Crosstabulation Count pendapatan Total 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 pekerjaan 1.00 25 5 30 2.00 15 15 3.00 10 10 20 4.00 10 10 5.00 10 10 6.00 5 5 5 15 Total 40 35 15 10 100 Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. 2-sided Pearson Chi-Square 154.266 a 15 .000 Likelihood Ratio 162.038 15 .001 Linear-by-Linear Association 2.810 1 .000 N of Valid Cases 100 a 16 cells 66.7 have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.00.. Lanjutan Lampiran 2 c. Tingkat Keseringan dan Nilai Belanja Frequency Table Tingkat keseringan Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1.00 43 43.0 43.0 43.0 2.00 57 57.0 57.0 100.0 Total 100 100.0 100.0 Nilai belanja Frequenc y Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 1.00 25 25.0 25 25 2.00 45 45.0 45.5 69.7 3.00 10 10.0 10.1 79.8 4.00 20 20.0 20.2 100.0 Total 100 100.0 100.0 Missing System 1 1.0 Total 100 100.0 Crosstabs Case Processing Summary Cases Valid Missing Total N Percent N Percent N Percent Tingkat keseringan Nilai belanja 100 100.0 .0 100 100.0 Tingkat keseringan Nilai belanja Crosstabulation Count Nilai belanja Total 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 Tingkat keseringan 1.00 25 18 43 2.00 27 10 20 57 Total 25 45 10 20 100 Lanjutan Lampiran 2. Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. 2-sided Pearson Chi-Square 55.936 a 3 .000 Likelihood Ratio 162.038 3 .000 Linear-by-Linear Association 2.810 1 .000 N of Valid Cases 100 a 1 cells 12.5 have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 4.30. Lampiran 3. a. Hasil Uji Validitas Tingkat Kepentingan No Atribut Koefisien r Kesimpulan 1 A1 0,397062 VALID 2 A2 0,693437 VALID 3 A3 0,711343 VALID 4 A4 0,715883 VALID 5 A5 0,891035 VALID 6 A6 0,631873 VALID 7 A7 0,777303 VALID 8 A8 0,74829 VALID 9 A9 0,709827 VALID 10 A10 0,613563 VALID b. Hasil Uji Validitas Tingkat Pelaksanaan No Atribut Koefisien r Kesimpulan 1 A1 0,661236 VALID 2 A2 0,616206 VALID 3 A3 0,67035 VALID 4 A4 0,65806 VALID 5 A5 0,665261 VALID 6 A6 0,665261 VALID 7 A7 0,665261 VALID 8 A8 0,629651 VALID 9 A9 0,662344 VALID 10 A10 0,722754 VALID Lampiran 4. a. Reliabilitas Tingkat Kepentingan Method 1 space saver will be used for this analysis R E L I A B I L I T Y A N A L Y S I S - S C A L E A L P H A Reliability Coefficients N of Cases = 30,0 N of Items = 3 Alpha = ,9212

b. Reliabilitas Tingkat PelaksanaanKinerja

Method 1 space saver will be used for this analysis R E L I A B I L I T Y A N A L Y S I S - S C A L E A L P H A Reliability Coefficients N of Cases = 30,0 N of Items = 3 Alpha = ,9046 Lampiran 5. Tanggapan responden berdasarkan tingkat kepentingan atribut produk Tas Tajur Bogor. Tanggapan Responden Atribut Produk Tidak Penting 1 Kurang Penting 2 Cukup Penting 3 Penting 4 Sangat Penting 5 Skor Skor Rataan 1 0 0 13 42 45 432 4,32 2 0 0 25 57 18 390 3,90 3 1 0 23 48 28 401 4,01 4 0 4 15 43 38 415 4,15 5 0 4 19 35 46 427 4,27 6 0 0 30 45 21 383 3,83 7 0 4 25 49 26 401 4,01 8 0 0 24 38 34 402 4,02 9 0 0 25 49 26 401 4,01 10 5 12 27 39 17 351 3,51