26
the program. The data from the comments and suggestions were used to revise and complete the planning to be the final draft.
5.
Writing the Second Draft
After getting some comments and suggestions from the experts, the first draft was revised and completed to be the second draft. Then it was ready to be
implemented in FEC 2015. 6.
Conducting Main Field Testing Implementation
This is the main step of this development in which the final draft was implemented. The implementation was held started from January to April 2015.
It took place in FBS campus UNY. In this step, the primary purpose of the main field test is to determine the success of the product.
7. Evaluating, revising, and writing the final product of the program developed
After the implementation, the developer conducted an evaluation of the program by interviewing some parents who had joined FEC 2015 and the EFC
students. They gave some evaluation and comments about the FEC 2015 and it was used to revise and write the final product of the program developed.
C. Design of Product Testing
1. Testing Design
The design of the testing was developed these ways. First, the program was constructed. It consisted of two main parts: the school management and
the academic activities. To be more specific, the management was divided into two namely the school profile that explained the name of the school, the
tagline, the logo, the schedule, and other school profile; and the management
27
officers explained about the structure of the school the management officers and the duties. In addition, the academic activities explained about the
developed syllabus of FEC 2015. Second, the program was evaluated. The evaluation was done by conducting a FEC workshop attending by the EFC
lecturers as the experts to give comments and suggestions about the program developed. The program was implemented in FEC 2015. In the
implementation, the steps referred to the SOP of FEC 2015.
2. Setting of the Testing
The program was carried out in Faculty of Languages and Arts, Yogyakarta State University UNY. There were both indoor and outdoor
activities during the program. The indoor activities took place in GK I and GK II FBS UNY, while the outdoor activities were around the FBS campus
and Banyu Sumilir playground in Sleman, Yogyakarta.
3. Subjects of the testing
The subjects are the EFC students who were doing the practicum, the EFC lecturers, the students of kindergarten and elementary school from grade
1 up to 6from some schools in Yogyakarta, and their parents.
4. Techniques and Instruments of Data Collection
a. Data Collection Technique
Data collection in educational research and development takes a variety of forms. It depends on the focus of the study. In this development,
the developer collected the information in some ways.
28
1. Needs survey
The aim was to get the information about the target needs. First, it was done by distributing the questionnaires to the prospective parents and the
elementary school and kindergarten teachers. The questionnaires were closed-ended question consisted of some aspects, such as the goals, input,
time length setting, teachers’ role, school fee, skills for learners, activities for learning, learning style, and assessment. Second, it was done by doing
FEC workshop to evaluate the first draft of the program. The workshop was attended by the EFC lecturers as the experts, and the EFC students as
the committee as well as the teachers of FEC 2015. The students explained about the program to the EFC lecturers to get some evaluation
and suggestion before the implementation. 2.
Observation The observation was done during the implementation in which the
developer recorded what happened right there at that time. The data were in the form of field notes and photograph. In observation, the developer
also did the information gathering by analyzing some documents as the source of the data. The documents were the brochures of English learning
program in Yogyakarta and the FEC 2014 book report. The data from the documents were simultaneously analyzed with the data from the
questionnaire to design the first draft of the development.
29
3. Interview
The interview was in the form of in depth interview as an open-ended interview. In depth interview is a qualitative research technique that
involves conducting intensive individual interviews with a small number of respondents to explore their perspectives on a particular idea, program
or situation Boyce, 2006:3. The interview was done after the implementation. The first interview was done with the EFC students as
the management officers and the teachers of FEC to evaluate the management and academic activities of FEC. The second interview was
done with the parents of FEC participants. It was consisted of the comments and feedbacks from some parents after joining the FEC 2015.
4. Expert judgment
The expert judgment was done by conducting workshop in which the first draft is presented to the EFC lecturers. The lecturers then evaluated the
first draft and gave some comments and suggestions. The data from the evaluation were used to write the second draft.
b. Data Collection Instruments
Types of instrument used in this development were in the form questionnaires and interviews guidelines. The instrument is explained below:
1. The organization of the questionnaires
Before making some questions, the developer made the blueprint of the questionnaire as the basic theories of the question. Here is the blueprint:
