Monthly Progress Report November 2013
Western I ndonesia National Roads I mprovement Project 14
DGH and the World Bank prior to the CTC establishment. The Bank approved the AERs with issuance letter Ref. No. WINRIP122 dated May 1
st
, 2013. Notification of Pre-Qualification Results had been announced to all PQ participants on
Mei 17, 2013 and then invitation to bid was sent to to pre-qualified Bidder and issued of the bidding document on May 27, 2013. Pokja had conducted the Pre-Bid Meeting and
Site Visit on June 2013. The last date for submission the bids and the bids opening was on July 18, 2013.
The Bank had received as well as reviewed all the proposed BER. Approval for BER issued by the Bank on September 18, 2013. Next step, the proposed of the winner must
be approved by the Ministry of Public Work because the value of contract more than IDR 100 billion based on Perpres 70, th. 2013,
Finally at the end of this month all four AWP-1 packages had been approved by Ministry, the last on November 25, 2013 for approval of contract award for Package 02 and
Package 03. Contract for Package 04: Ipuh – Bantal, Province Bengkulu was signed on November 14, 2013. Package 01: Krui – Biha, Lampung Province, the contract was
signed on November 25, 2013. The meantime, the World Bank had agreed to start PQ process for Package 17: Sp. Gunung Kemala -
Pg. Tampak, Lampung Province. Invitation to Pre-Qualification had been published in UNDB Online and Ministry of Public
Works website since November 11, 2013 and the last date to submitted the PQ Application is December 30, 2013.
DGH has also completed the draft of consolidated multiple contract ICB Standard Bidding Document for four 4 packages under AWP-1. The draft had been submitted to
the Bank on 8 March 2012. The Bank’s comments had been issued on 12 March 2012. The draft of consolidated SBD was revised by DGH accommodating the Bank’s
comments and submitted to the Banks on 27 June 2012. Second revision of the draft consolidated SBD, as requested by the Bank regarding synchronization between
drawings and Bill of Quantities by letter dated 1 August 2012, was then concurred by the Bank on 31 October 2012.
CTC had also involved in Selection of DSC WINRIP since March 2013, started by attend the opening of Financial Proposal on March 5, 2013. Procurement committee for
Selection of DSC had sent Technical Evaluation Report TER to the Bank on December 20, 2013 and had received the approval from the Bank on February 21, 2013. The Final
Evaluation Report including Technical and Financial Evaluation and completed with Notice of Negotiation and Draft Contract then was sent to Bank by the committee on April
3
rd
, 2013. NOL from the Bank was received on April 19, 2013 to Renardet, SA Switzerland cs as the first rank of technical and financial evaluation result. Finally the
contract for this assignment was sign on June 11, 2013.
The WINRIP Procurement Plan is shown in Appendix E.
Monthly Progress Report November 2013
Western I ndonesia National Roads I mprovement Project 15
4.3 Civil Works Implementation
Until the end of November 2013, there was no subproject contracted.
4.4 Civil Works Progress
No civil works progress can be reported since there was no subproject contracted until the end of November 2013.
4.5 Quality Assurance
The DSC will be responsible for quality assurance of materials and workmanship, certifying whether or not contractors have achieved the required results, as well as
documentation and reporting based on the financial management plan. They will prepare a Quality Assurance system covering all subprojects, and continuously monitor the
effectiveness of their supervision procedures.
On July 01, 2013 Quality Assurance Engineer of the CTC already in mobilization. And on the 18
th
to 20
th
November 2013, he had gone to the site visit package Sp. Rampa-Poriaha, North Sumatera Province.
The purpose of the site visit was to introduce the CTC Quality Assurance Engineer to Ka. Satker and PPK package Sp. Rampa-Poriaha and discuss quality assurance aspect in
relation to upcoming construction of package no. 5 Sp. Rampa-Poriaha the QA site visit is not inspect to site, discussion with Ka. Satker only
There are some conclusion of the discussions held during the site visit, as: o
CTC explain about Quality Assurance Report to be prepared by Contractor, checked by Consultant and approved by PPK PPK staff
o The most important Quality Assurance Report must be comply with Standard
Operation Procedure SOP both for administration and technical works. o
CTC submitted to PPK Staff PPK, letter from Director General of Highways regarding the Technical Settings Hot Asphalt Mixture Production Units Using Coal
Fuel for Heating Aggregate.
4.6 Environmental and Social Considerations 4.6.1 Current Overall Situation
A project category is assigned to each package as either Category A, B or C depending on the likely degree of influence on environmental issues with a
brief explanation as follows Appendix E.
Category A project is one which will have a significant negative impact on the environment and may have an influence on areas outside the actual project area. A
project classified as such requires an AMDAL ANDAL, RKLRPL study.
Category B project is one which affects the people or the environment to some extent but with a smaller impact than a Category A. The required environmental analysis is a
UKLUPL study only.
Category C project has minimal effect on the people or environment and an
Monthly Progress Report November 2013
Western I ndonesia National Roads I mprovement Project 16
environmental analysis is not required. Standard operational procedures SOP or SKPPL are used to handle any minor problem which may arise.
Details of packages that require environmental and social safeguard are given in Appendix No. 8 and the following table provides a summary of the work involved in the
21 WINRIP packages.
Works Program
No of Packages
No of Investigations Approval by
Remarks BLH
World Bank
AWP-1 4
8 SPPL x 4
Full LARAP x 4 4
SPPL 4
Full LARAP Approved – NOL
issued by WB, except for SPPL
AWP-2 8
17 Simple LARAP x 1
Full LARAP x 8 AMDAL Study x 4
UKLUPL x 4 4
UKLUPL 3
AMDAL 1
SLARAP 1 one Study AMDAL
for threes packages, are Packages No.7, 12
and 14 packages on AWP2 AWP3.
1 one Study AMDAL for two packages, are
Packages No.11 16. packages on AWP2
AWP3.
AWP-3 9
14 Full LARAP x 8
AMDAL Study x 1 UKLUPL x 5
5 UKLUPL
2 Full LARAP
Approved – NOL issued by WB, except
for AMDAL and UKLUPL
Total 21
39 Env=18, Soc=21
16 7
Note: UKL UPL do not need a NOL from WB, and SPPL not necessary to submit to the WB.
Out of 21 packages, have required environmental impact investigation. All 39 studies 18 environmental studies need approval of the Environmental Agency BLH, and 21
social studies SLARAP and LARAP requiring approval of the World Bank. Up to the end of November 2013, 16 packages 88 has received BLH approval then the
current have 7 of 21 social studies or 33 has received approval from the World Bank.
Those packages that require action at present with respect to environmental or social considerations are:
• Environmental studies for packages No.1,2 and 3 was issued approval by BLH on
2010, packages No.4,5,6,9,13,15,18,19.20 and 21 was approved on 2011 and BLH approved on 2012 for package No.17 then BLH approved for packages No.8
10 on 2013.
• Social studies LARAP and SLARAP was issued NOL WB for packages No.5:
Sp.Rampa-Poriaha SLARAP and package No.17: Sp.Gunung Kemala-Pugung Tampak LARAP on 16 September 2013 and package No.Sibolga-Bts Tapsel 0n
22 Oct 2013 those sub projects can started for bidding process.
4.6.2 Environmental and Social Issues
