3. 8. Perhitungan Alternatif Terhadap Sub Kriteria Laju Erosi- Sedimentasi Spesifik

91 Alternatif Bobot Lokal Bobot Global a12 Waduk Cimulya 0,060 0,0060 a13 Waduk Cimara 0,117 0,0117 a14 Waduk Cigalagah 0,157 0,0157 a15 Waduk Haur Kuning 0,077 0,0077 Sumber : Analisa, 2011

5. 3. 8. Perhitungan Alternatif Terhadap Sub Kriteria Laju Erosi- Sedimentasi Spesifik

Perhitungan alternatif dilakukan berdasarkan data yang diperoleh dari penelitian sebelumnya. Data yang ada kemudian dibandingkan satu sama lain sebagai mana pada Tabel 5.35 di bawah ini. Tabel 5.35. Perhitungan Perbandingan Berpasangan Alternatif Terhadap Sub Kriteria Laju Erosi-Sedimentasi Spesifik. No Perbandin gan Data Lebih Baik Rasio Perbandingan Hasil Perbandingan A B A B Pilihan Nilai Pairwise Keterangan 1 a1 a2 79,230 35,650 B 2,222 B 3 2 a1 a3 79,230 27,430 B 2,888 B 4 3 a1 a4 79,230 60,330 B 1,313 B 1 4 a1 a5 79,230 49,920 B 1,587 B 2 5 a1 a6 79,230 95,340 A 1,203 A 1 6 a1 a7 79,230 71,020 B 1,116 B 1 7 a1 a8 79,230 74,150 B 1,069 B 1 8 a1 a9 79,230 73,230 B 1,082 B 1 9 a1 a10 79,230 47,340 B 1,674 B 2 10 a1 a11 79,230 60,630 B 1,307 B 1 11 a1 a12 79,230 58,460 B 1,355 B 1 12 a1 a13 79,230 34,980 B 2,265 B 3 13 a1 a14 79,230 177,340 A 2,238 A 3 14 a1 a15 79,230 85,390 A 1,078 A 1 15 a2 a3 35,650 27,430 B 1,300 B 1 16 a2 a4 35,650 60,330 A 1,692 A 2 17 a2 a5 35,650 49,920 A 1,400 A 2 18 a2 a6 35,650 95,340 A 2,674 A 3 19 a2 a7 35,650 71,020 A 1,992 A 2 20 a2 a8 35,650 74,150 A 2,080 A 2 21 a2 a9 35,650 73,230 A 2,054 A 2 22 a2 a10 35,650 47,340 A 1,328 A 1 23 a2 a11 35,650 60,630 A 1,701 A 2 24 a2 a12 35,650 58,460 A 1,640 A 2 25 a2 a13 35,650 34,980 B 1,019 B 1 26 a2 a14 35,650 177,340 A 4,974 A 6 92 No Perbandin gan Data Lebih Baik Rasio Perbandingan Hasil Perbandingan A B A B Pilihan Nilai Pairwise Keterangan 27 a2 a15 35,650 85,390 A 2,395 A 3 28 a3 a4 27,430 60,330 A 2,199 A 3 29 a3 a5 27,430 49,920 A 1,820 A 2 30 a3 a6 27,430 95,340 A 3,476 A 4 31 a3 a7 27,430 71,020 A 2,589 A 3 32 a3 a8 27,430 74,150 A 2,703 A 3 33 a3 a9 27,430 73,230 A 2,670 A 3 34 a3 a10 27,430 47,340 A 1,726 A 2 35 a3 a11 27,430 60,630 A 2,210 A 3 36 a3 a12 27,430 58,460 A 2,131 A 3 37 a3 a13 27,430 34,980 A 1,275 A 1 38 a3 a14 27,430 177,340 A 6,465 A 8 39 a3 a15 27,430 85,390 A 3,113 A 4 40 a4 a5 60,330 49,920 B 1,209 B 1 41 a4 a6 60,330 95,340 A 1,580 A 2 42 a4 a7 60,330 71,020 A 1,177 A 1 43 a4 a8 60,330 74,150 A 1,229 A 1 44 a4 a9 60,330 73,230 A 1,214 A 1 45 a4 a10 60,330 47,340 B 1,274 B 1 46 a4 a11 60,330 60,630 A 1,005 A 1 47 a4 a12 60,330 58,460 B 1,032 B 1 48 a4 a13 60,330 34,980 B 1,725 B 2 49 a4 a14 60,330 177,340 A 2,939 A 4 50 a4 a15 60,330 85,390 A 1,415 A 2 51 a5 a6 49,920 95,340 A 1,910 A 2 52 a5 a7 49,920 71,020 A 1,423 A 2 53 a5 a8 49,920 74,150 A 1,485 A 2 54 a5 a9 49,920 73,230 A 1,467 A 2 55 a5 a10 49,920 47,340 B 1,054 B 1 56 a5 a11 49,920 60,630 A 1,215 A 1 57 a5 a12 49,920 58,460 A 1,171 A 1 58 a5 a13 49,920 34,980 B 1,427 B 2 59 a5 a14 49,920 177,340 A 3,552 A 4 60 a5 a15 49,920 85,390 A 1,711 A 2 61 a6 a7 95,340 71,020 B 1,342 B 1 62 a6 a8 95,340 74,150 B 1,286 B 1 63 a6 a9 95,340 73,230 B 1,302 B 1 64 a6 a10 95,340 47,340 B 2,014 B 2 65 a6 a11 95,340 60,630 B 1,572 B 2 66 a6 a12 95,340 58,460 B 1,631 B 2 67 a6 a13 95,340 34,980 B 2,726 B 3 68 a6 a14 95,340 177,340 A 1,860 A 2 69 a6 a15 95,340 85,390 B 1,117 B 1 70 a7 a8 71,020 74,150 A 1,044 A 1 71 a7 a9 71,020 73,230 A 1,031 A 1 72 a7 a10 71,020 47,340 B 1,500 B 2 73 a7 a11 71,020 60,630 B 1,171 B 1 74 a7 a12 71,020 58,460 B 1,215 B 1 Tabel 5.35. lanjutan 93 No Perbandin gan Data Lebih Baik Rasio Perbandingan Hasil Perbandingan A B A B Pilihan Nilai Pairwise Keterangan 75 a7 a13 71,020 34,980 B 2,030 B 2 76 a7 a14 71,020 177,340 A 2,497 A 3 77 a7 a15 71,020 85,390 A 1,202 A 1 78 a8 a9 74,150 73,230 B 1,013 B 1 79 a8 a10 74,150 47,340 B 1,566 B 2 80 a8 a11 74,150 60,630 B 1,223 B 1 81 a8 a12 74,150 58,460 B 1,268 B 1 82 a8 a13 74,150 34,980 B 2,120 B 2 83 a8 a14 74,150 177,340 A 2,392 A 3 84 a8 a15 74,150 85,390 A 1,152 A 1 85 a9 a10 73,230 47,340 B 1,547 B 2 86 a9 a11 73,230 60,630 B 1,208 B 1 87 a9 a12 73,230 58,460 B 1,253 B 1 88 a9 a13 73,230 34,980 B 2,093 B 2 89 a9 a14 73,230 177,340 A 2,422 A 3 90 a9 a15 73,230 85,390 A 1,166 A 1 91 a10 a11 47,340 60,630 A 1,281 A 1 92 a10 a12 47,340 58,460 A 1,235 A 1 93 a10 a13 47,340 34,980 B 1,353 B 1 94 a10 a14 47,340 177,340 A 3,746 A 5 95 a10 a15 47,340 85,390 A 1,804 A 2 96 a11 a12 60,630 58,460 B 1,037 B 1 97 a11 a13 60,630 34,980 B 1,733 B 2 98 a11 a14 60,630 177,340 A 2,925 A 4 99 a11 a15 60,630 85,390 A 1,408 A 2 100 a12 a13 58,460 34,980 B 1,671 B 2 101 a12 a14 58,460 177,340 A 3,034 A 4 102 a12 a15 58,460 85,390 A 1,461 A 2 103 a13 a14 34,980 177,340 A 5,070 A 6 104 a13 a15 34,980 85,390 A 2,441 A 3 105 a14 a15 177,340 85,390 B 2,077 B 2 Sumber : Analisa, 2011 Dari hasil perhitungan perbandingan berpasangan pada Tabel 5.35 maka dapat disusun matriks perbandingan berpasangan untuk alternatif terhadap sub kriteria debit banjir rencana sebagaimana pada Tabel 5.36. Tabel 5.35. lanjutan 94 Tabel 5.36. Matriks Perbandingan Berpasangan Alternatif Terhadap Sub Kriteria Laju Erosi-Sedimentasi Spesifik a1 a2 a3 a4 a5 a6 a7 a8 a9 a10 a11 a12 a13 a14 a15 a1 1,000 0,333 0,250 1,000 0,500 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 0,500 1,000 1,000 0,333 3,000 1,000 a2 3,000 1,000 1,000 2,000 2,000 3,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 1,000 2,000 2,000 1,000 6,000 3,000 a3 4,000 1,000 1,000 3,000 2,000 4,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 2,000 3,000 3,000 1,000 8,000 4,000 a4 1,000 0,500 0,333 1,000 1,000 2,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 0,500 4,000 2,000 a5 2,000 0,500 0,500 1,000 1,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 0,500 4,000 2,000 a6 1,000 0,333 0,250 0,500 0,500 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 0,500 0,500 0,500 0,333 2,000 1,000 a7 1,000 0,500 0,333 1,000 0,500 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 0,500 1,000 1,000 0,500 3,000 1,000 a8 1,000 0,500 0,333 1,000 0,500 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 0,500 1,000 1,000 0,500 3,000 1,000 a9 1,000 0,500 0,333 1,000 0,500 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 0,500 1,000 1,000 0,500 3,000 1,000 a10 2,000 1,000 0,500 1,000 1,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 5,000 2,000 a11 1,000 0,500 0,333 1,000 1,000 2,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 0,500 4,000 2,000 a12 1,000 0,500 0,333 1,000 1,000 2,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 0,500 4,000 2,000 a13 3,000 1,000 1,000 2,000 2,000 3,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 1,000 2,000 2,000 1,000 6,000 3,000 a14 0,333 0,167 0,125 0,250 0,250 0,500 0,333 0,333 0,333 0,200 0,250 0,250 0,167 1,000 0,500 a15 1,000 0,333 0,250 0,500 0,500 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 0,500 0,500 0,500 0,333 2,000 1,000 Sumber : Analisa, 2011 Setelah dilakukan perhitungan eigen vektor, diperoleh bobot lokal untuk kelima belas alternatif, yang kemudian dikalikan dengan bobot sub kriteria Laju Erosi- Sedimentasi Spesifik untuk memperoleh bobot global sebagai mana pada Tabel 5.37. Tabel 5.37. Bobot Alternatif Terhadap Sub Kriteria Laju Erosi-Sedimentasi Spesifik Alternatif Bobot Lokal Bobot Global a1 Waduk Seuseupan 0,045 0,0023 a2 Waduk Cihirup Cipanundan 0,114 0,0057 a3 Waduk Masigit 0,151 0,0076 a4 Waduk Maneungteung 0,060 0,0030 a5 Waduk Gunungkarung 0,074 0,0037 a6 Waduk Cihowe 0,038 0,0019 a7 Waduk Peucang 0,049 0,0024 a8 Waduk Dukuhbadag 0,049 0,0024 a9 Waduk Cileuweung 0,049 0,0024 a10 Waduk Ciwaru 0,082 0,0041 a11 Waduk Ciniru 0,060 0,0030 a12 Waduk Cimulya 0,060 0,0030 95 Alternatif Bobot Lokal Bobot Global a13 Waduk Cimara 0,114 0,0057 a14 Waduk Cigalagah 0,017 0,0008 a15 Waduk Haur Kuning 0,038 0,0019 Sumber : Analisa, 2011

5. 3. 9. Perhitungan Alternatif Terhadap Sub Kriteria Luas Genangan Relatif