needs from the students. Therefore, the writer also did interviews with two English teachers of SMA Negeri 4 Yogyakarta.
2. Data Gathering Technique for the Evaluation Survey
After finishing the designed materials, the writer conducted the evaluation survey on the designed materials. In this survey, the writer asked the two English
teachers of SMA Negeri 4 Yogyakarta and a lecturer of the English Education Study Program of Sanata Dharma University to evaluate the designed materials.
The writer gave the designed materials and the questionnaire to them. After few days, the writer got the designed materials and the questionnaire back to be
analyzed. Then, the results were used to revise and make some improvements to the designed materials.
E. Data Analysis Technique
There were two important points to be discussed in the data analysis techniques. They are data analysis technique of the need survey and data analysis
of the evaluation survey on the designed materials.
1. Data Analysis Technique of the Need Survey
The writer analyzed the data after gathering the data from the questionnaire and interview. The data from the questionnaire were calculated
using percentage method. The formula is as follows. n
The percentage = x 100
N
Note: n = the number of students who chose a certain option
N = the total number of students PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
Furthermore, the writer also gained the data from the interview. All the data functioned as the consideration for the writer to design materials using
Cooperative Integrated Reading and Composition CIRC for the eleventh grade students of SMA Negeri 4 Yogyakarta.
2. Data Analysis Technique of the Evaluation Survey
In the evaluation survey on the designed materials, the writer used the second questionnaire for the two English teachers of SMA Negeri 4 Yogyakarta
and one lecturer of English Language Study Program of Sanata Dharma University. The second questionnaire was divided into Part A and Part B.
In Part A, the respondents were to give their opinions by choosing from the options given. The options were based on the Points of Agreement using
“Likert Scale”, in which the respondents were asked to register their responses on 5 points of agreement. Actually, in this study, the writer didn’t use all the points
of agreement in order to avoid uncertain answers for point three. In line with it, the writer only used four points of agreement.
The points of agreement and the meanings can be seen in Table 3.2
Table 3.2 Points of Agreement of the Respondents’ Opinions
Points of Agreement
Meaning
1
If the respondents strongly disagree with the statement
2
If the respondents disagree with the statement
3
If the respondents agree with the statement
4
If the respondents strongly agree with the statement
Kategori