Intertextuality Analysis Lexical cohesion: hyponymy

officials’ statement and appears the French statement again. It shows negative perspective on Iran within the sentence. Table.3.11. The representation analysis of Datum 10 Sentence Representation in clause: Verbal process One of the officials said the deal was designed to delay the point at which Iran could develop a nuclear weapon while providing temporary, reversible sanctions relief. But Fabius told radio station France Inter on Saturday that while Paris wanted a deal, it wouldnt agree to a fools game -- and that the proposal on the table at that time was unsatisfactory. The Sayer Verbal The verbiage One of the officials said the deal was designed to delay the point at which Iran could develop a nuclear weapon while providing temporary, reversible sanctions relief. Fabius told Saturday that while Paris wanted a deal, it wouldnt agree to a fools game -- and that the proposal on the table at that time was unsatisfactory. Representation inter-clause combination Cons with Iran By the table above, there are two main clauses which is shaped in different perspective. In the first clause, “one of the officials” refers to the U.S. administration. The journalist shows the “one of the officials” as the sayer without tells who that one is. The sayer says that “the deal is designed to delay the point at which Iran could develop a nuclear weapon while providing temporary, reversible sanctions relief ”. The clause presents that the journalist shows the U.S. officials is pro with the negotiation. The second clause presents the opposite statement from French Prime Minister, Laurent Fabius. In the clause, the journalist shows Fabius as the Sayers who is the one of the P5+1 power. Fabius as the Minister of Foreign Affairs and International Development in France, criticizes the agreement is like a fools game because it is unsatisfactory deal. The clause is showed by the journalist French that one of P5+1 country protests with the negotiation. By positioning the U.S. officials and French’s argumentation, the journalist shows the contradiction between the U.S. administration officials which support the negotiation and the French Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius. The sentence presents that the one of official of the U.S. administration says the deal is designed to delay the point at which Iran could develop a nuclear weapon while providing temporary, reversible sanctions relief, but for France the deal is not a convenient one, Paris would refuse the deal because there is any certainty that French can conclude of it. However, both of the U.S. officials and French’s statement are in contra with Iran which refuses the deal although the proposal is mostly drafted by U.S. and Iran. It proves that the journalist presents the negative perspective on Iran both of the U.S. officials and French’s arguments.

b. Intertextuality Analysis

The French statement is strengthened by The Guardian app 60 that already has been analyzed in the 15 th sentence. The French complained that the text, which they said was mostly drafted by Iran and the US, had been presented as a fait accompli and they did not want to be stampeded into agreement. Fabius told France Inter radio yesterday morning that Paris would not ac cept a “fool’s 60 http:www.theguardian.comworld2013nov10iran-nuclear-deal-stalls-reactor- plutonium-france , Op Cit.